>>
|
No. 17493
ID: 9ea451
File
146713971081.jpg
- (117.62KB
, 1120x630
, drink_gallery5_546e2142f4c6.jpg
)
>>17492
I know someone who uses that Soylent stuff. It tastes like liquid oatmeal. It's a meal replacement program for weight loss.
The Problem With Soylent 2.0 Goes Far Beyond Its Terrible Taste
Could you go on a full-Soylent existence?
For people who work so much that they can’t be bothered to eat (let alone make a grocery list, buy the items and cook anything), Soylent “food product” 2.0 is here to save you. Or so you may think.
First sold as a mix, but now packaged in a trendy pearlescent bottle (hence the “2.0”), Soylent was envisioned by its Silicon Valley creators as a “disruption” to the way we eat food. (The creators are, after all, start-up entrepreneurs too busy to cook nutritious food.)
When Soylent debuted last year, the New York Times’ tech columnist Farhad Manjoo described it as “the most joyless new technology to hit the world since we first laid eyes on MS-DOS.”
But techies, ever the trend mongers, adopted it with abandon, whether they drank Soylent or other similar versions of the product: Schmoylent, Schmilk or People Chow.
A mixture of protein, fats, fiber, carbohydrates, and other daily necessities, Soylent 2.0, which will begin shipping this month, is precisely 400 calories per bottle — a “nutritionally complete staple food designed to provide maximum nutrition with minimal effort. It’s the easiest, affordable way to squeeze in a healthy meal on-the-go without even trying,” according to the pitch sent with samples from their publicist.
Soylent 2.0 tastes like a chalkboard-eraser-Elmer’s-glue smoothie, but it really is convenient and, if not tasty, palatable. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/soylent-2-0-review_us_561d6324e4b050c6c4a32aa3
|