Well from Oakley's website, there's no real difference except the color of the lens and how much light it lets through.

>TR22 eliminates 78% of ambient light and blocks 100% of UVA, UVB, and UVC light.
>TR45 eliminates 55% of ambient light and blocks 100% of UVA, UVB, and UVC light.

I recently got a spare frame for my Radarlocks, so I could have a set with the dark tint and a set with the clear lenses. I would rather have M Frames but they don't make prescriptions for them so went for the next best thing, so far I haven't been disappointed in any way.

Interdasting. I am excited to wear these to the range, I guess the TR22 would be appropriate for outdoors and the TR45s for inside shootan.

I've really enjoyed mine. The lenses were developed with sport shooters in mind, so they've done quite well for me shooting trap.

fuck I broke the nosepiece thing

>>18106
Two months, almost to the day.

The mind boggles.

https://www.amazon.com/Edge-Eyewear-DB116-Banraj-Glasses/dp/B0001YXRIC

My new favorite sunglasses. Pretty much just like older M-Frames, but they're $8 and MIL_PRF 31013 3.5.1.1 compliant.

Bretty fuggin gud.

I just got a pair of Smith Optics Chamber glasses. I say glasses and not sunglasses because I got clear frames. They're supposedly wider-framed than their Director model I had my eye on. Need that for my oversized noggin.

Affordable at only $80 and I believe Smith scored well in a Lucky Gunner test of eye protection years back.