7 shot Raging Judge .410 Speed Loader is made from solid billet aluminum looks quite nice.
https://www.5starfirearms.com/7RJ-410-Speed-Loader-p/tf41007000.htm

6 shot Raging Judge .454 Speed Loader
http://www.5starfirearms.com/6RJ-454-Speed-Loader-p/tf45406000.htm

>>103710

I've seen those, but a double rifle that has usage for big and small game would just be handy. Pedersolli (I think that's how you spell it) has a new production double barrel 45 long colt with chambers long enough for .410, all in a pistol format. A stock with 454 and longer barrel could really suit my needs (wants).

>>103709
And here's one by Pedersoli.
https://www.davide-pedersoli.com/tipologia-prodotti.asp/l_en/idt_61/rifles-kodiak-mark-iv.html

told.

  >>103685
The moment I saw KDG's Kinect system, I knew M-LOK was the winner.

how long have you had this thing? The ejector looks suspiciously beat, like shit has chipped off on the corner. I don't know if it is enough to effect the function but even on my relatively high round count AK's, it doesn't look like that. It is smooth with a shiny spot where the case has been hitting.

That aside, if you have another working AK handy. You should try and compare the position of the ejector's front face to that one. I had a very VERY troublesome AKS74 that always had ejection issues (stovepipes mostly). The ejector was sitting way back compared to the ejector on my other AK. I had to grind off the spot welds and re-weld on a new ejector rail further up (didn't know how to weld/have a welder at the time, other than a spot welder). It works great now.

>>103626
Owned it nearly two years now.less than 700rounds through it by me.I suspect the damage is from the bolt hitting it and just being a cheaper or bad heat treated rail.

>>103635
>I suspect the damage is from the bolt hitting it

I think you'd feel it in the bolt if that were the case.

>or bad heat treated rail.

That appears to be the most likely suspect in my opinion.
I guess you also mostly shot steel cased? Not that there's anything wrong with that, but that might have sped up the wear.

>>103644
Its definitely the bolt. Can see light wear marks on the bolt from where it makes contact.

careful welding the extractor, I did and had to file it just right, otherwise my ak wouldnt eject at all.

From the shaped hull, it seems to be primarily designed to increase survivability of the crew in case a mine goes off. When a mine goes off, your primary gas tank might be gone, but it might have a secundary internally to at least limp home.

Either way, a hugely retarded choices for LE. They should have other priorities.

>>103643
>They should have other priorities.

But but ISIS and homegrown right wing turrurrists and and and and...

Gets harder to distinguish between the police and the military every year. Unfortunately, that seems to be the point.

>>103643
Who cares about mine protection when it's free from the DOD and offers the same ballistic protection as a Bearcat?

>>103654
free except you have to pay for the maintence. Oh and the DOD can recall it back if they need it.

>>103655
>free except you have to pay for the maintence

A relatively minor cost, and there are DHS grants for stuff like that.

>the DOD can recall it back if they need it.

Which has only affected tracked vehicles (M113s) and the agencies returning them get priority for a armored HMMWV or MRAP to replace it.

holi Shit, its like lookin a six way mirror

Captain Sweden strikes again!

Deagle Mk I WWI prototype

is that ball ammo or API Anus Piercing Immunodeficiency?

>>103650
Could be APIT Anus Piercing Internal Trauma.

>>103007
>Have you tried the Smith & Wesson Model 640 Pro? A 5-shot .357 Magnum with a 2.13-inch barrel.

I have not. I did last year try a the Ruger LCR in .357 Magnum, a less pretty but lightweight polymer framed snubby.

I have to say that fifty rounds of American Eagle 158gr softnoses were just about as much fun as I really wanted to have. And I don't consider myself especially recoil-sensitive, at least with handguns. Smith 29s and 629s with full-power .44 Mag ammo are, for me, fun (within the limits of my DA shooting), not punishing. But that LCR in .357 was a bit much.

  >>103035
That's the one.

>>103034
>I want to be more skilled at using all types of firearms

I'm with you here. I understand people who train on one type and that's it. But I like guns too much to do that. I'm decent with damn near anything and good with any proper firearm. With revolvers, just go with a decent quality Smith or Ruger with a 4" or 6" barrel, and actually enjoy shooting it.

> but short-barreled .38 Special revolvers strike me as being 1898's answer to questions about concealable handguns for self-defense. The 20th Century had better answers to those questions, and the 21st Century has better answers still.

Yes. I crack up at stories of people still carrying 38 revolvers in Vietnam.

> using the stance and grip from this old training film

No, just no.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>103034
>I can get faster hits and hold the X-ring using the sights. For me, at least, point shooting doesn't seem to work very well.

An interesting test to do, is to put a humansized target at 10 yards, place your feet in the correct shooting position and have the gun at low ready. Now close your eyes and bring the gun up to your natural point of aim and slowly fire off a round or 3 with your eyes still closed.

While not perfectly grouped, they'll be in about the same area and will show you if it's actually your stance that's throwing you off. Or well, you could just be pulling every shot, but that is something that someone watching you should be able to tell you. If there's no obvious reason why you're fucking up the shots, it's likely because you're fighting your natural stance.

>>103044
I did this at the range today, though I was trying something I'd just purchased which was a bit muzzle heavy--a Ruger Mk III "Hunter" with the 6 7/8" fluted target barrel.

Got 7 of 10 on paper, all low, in a pattern only slightly less wide than the entire paper target, which was another B27.

I will need to do this again with other firearms to see whether it's the long heavy barrel that makes me shoot low or something else, I think.

>>103638

If the Hunter is atypical (in length, front weight and very importantly, the grip angle) it might be normal at first that you're not tracking as you should. That said, I've have expected them all to be on paper. Seems rather inconsistent if you're all over the place.

>>103617
Holds in the detent spring for the fire select.
In the standard AR grip the spring just goes in a hole in the grip.

but VE MAKE IT BETTER, JA?

>>103618
Correct, normally AR pistol grip install up into the receiver but CQR has to come in from the back because of the buffer tube so the spring has to be installed afterward

A bunch people on /k/inder is saying mine is a bootleg/knockoff and theirs doesn't look like mine and better. But no one has offered actual photo of their taken apart stock.

Also please stand by for range report, I haven't have time to take pictures but both Frankengun and Stoplossed doesn't like the stock. It functions but they feel meh about it.

>>103620
One of the thing I didn't like about the stock is the cheek weld area feels odd. Look at the Magpul MOE/CTR it's slightly larger compare to the CQR which made the CQR a little bit less comfortable to rest my face on it.

Handled the Cali-compliant HERA stock today. You're right Mammit, those mold lines are rather noticeable.

this is reddit tier faggotry, especially for a fake product.

Yeah, man. I want my alien shoulder thing that goes up. It's pretty highly reviewed.

http://www.exilemachine.net/shop/reviews/alien-shoulder-thing-that-goes-up-21111/customers-review-53.html
>Best laser blaster I ever used. Total disintegration. Just awkward ducking through heavy cover.

>>103592
Based Exile Machine.

Reminds me of reading about people making space gun props for movies and placing a blank-firing revolver or starter pistol inside it.

>>103603
>Reminds me of reading about people making space gun props for movies and placing a blank-firing revolver or starter pistol inside it.

But you just posted 2 real guns in one (only 1 left functional though). :)

Charter Arms 44Spl Police Bulldog + Steyr Mannlicher 222 Model SL

I'm going to hijack this. Not muzzle loading, but I shot my Pietta 1860 yesterday for the first time yesterday. I'm a total n00b when it comes to black powder.

1) I cleaned up using a mix of vinegar and water (shooting Pyrodex) using an old toothbrush, cleaning rod, and a copper wire (for the nipple holes). Is there some better solution for cleaning up Pyrodex? Also, how urgent is it to neutralize the salts? I cleaned it same day but I didn't wash it at the range immediately after shooting.

2) I topped each cylinder with bore butter because I had read you need to "season" new barrels. Long-term, how much lubricant should you be shooting?

3) Hard to say, but how many shots/fowling accumulate before it begins to affect accuracy? Trying to decide if it's worth bringing a whole cleaning kit to the range.

>>103368
>>103404
I heard a neat trick to dial in your powder is to get a tarp and just shoot over it. Any presence of unburnt powder should indicate that you should use less and adjust from there.

I've also been using FFF powder as primer in my flintlock with less than moderate success. Would recommend FFFF to prime the pan

What is meant by a "muzzle-loading bolt action?"

  >>103574
They are also called "in-line muzzle-loaders" where the bolt's firing pin strikes the percussion cap you place over the nipple when you open the bolt.
How To Load & Fire a Bolt Action Muzzleloader Rifle - Muzzle-Loaders.com https://youtu.be/gKlyvTnhgGk

>>103578
>>103574
yo DAWG I herd you like bein a Fudd while you Fudd.

FARC-EP is Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia—People's Army.
And they seem to favor Kalashnikovs and Galils.

Being such fans of drug smuggling, you would think they'd also be fans of Stoner's rifles.

I spoke too soon.

>>103525
My source: http://weaponsman.com/?p=6709

> Two of the most interesting articles cover guns that never caught on, the FN CAL, and the even more exotic, FARC-3.

> FARC-3 1986The FARC-3 was the “assault rifle of tomorrow” in 1986, and we guess it still is. The resemblance to the AR-18 and Stoner 63 is come by honestly enough, for the FARC was also a Gene Stoner design. Funded by DARPA and built by the Ohio company ARES, the FARC acronym stood for Future Assault Rifle Concept, and the gun used an AK-ish operating system, with striker rather than hammer fire, and then-novel plastic magazines. The article predicted that the idea of plastic magazines, at least, was here to stay.

>>103530
>My source

Yeah, reverse image search got me that much. But other than that? Very little.
Which is odd. It looks like an interesting rifle that's a significant departure from the AR15, AR18 or Stoner 63.