-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

Subject   (new thread)
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 300x300 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 1141 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2017-02-04 Show/Hide Show All

Patches and Stickers for sale here

File 153627568120.jpg - (37.52KB , 808x587 , avra valley shoot.jpg )
107734 No. 107734 ID: 649f2c hide watch quickreply [Reply]
Best guns for posers, narcissists and other shameless self promoters to use for social media selfies? The old tiger striped gold deagle isn't quite "official military gear" lookin enough to suit the contemporary crowd of wannabes.
>> No. 107735 ID: e35b40
whatever you choose you can certainly do better than diamondback. how about a nice masterpiece arms carbine?
>> No. 107737 ID: 5631ab
There is a retarded amount of easy money to be had from posting gun pics to IG. They don't all have to be selfies, you can take picture of the guns if you want.
>> No. 107738 ID: dfc83d
File 15366093631.jpg - (79.85KB , 2048x1536 , 8325071.jpg )
I think my favorite is ridiculous magnum revolver cartridges being fired from absurdly short barrels. Bonus points if the owner actually got a custom carry rig for the fucking thing. Pic is S&W 460ES.
>> No. 107739 ID: 9dcda2
He's probably better of not practicing, otherwise he'll develop the flinch from hell.

File 153539553686.jpg - (12.52KB , 311x207 , G5R4SIRT7UYZDATSZ272H2UMGU_JPG.jpg )
107715 No. 107715 ID: 9568c0 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Less than two months after the end of net neutrality and the kid gloves are off. Americans who are exercising their second amendment rights are no longer protected by the first amendment because won't somebody please think of the children and our NRA backed president doesn't seem to care at all. Our last line of defense turned out out to be as worthwhile as The Maginot Line.
Federal judge blocks publication of 3-D printed gun blueprints

A federal judge on Monday blocked a Texas-based company from making digital blueprints for 3-D printed firearms publicly available online.

The decision effectively criminalizes publication of the 3-D designs for guns, banning Defense Distributed founder Cody Wilson from posting the digital files on the Internet. The legal controversy has sparked a national conversation about the implications of untraceable plastic guns and constitutional rights.

The decision, in favor of attorneys general from 19 states and the District of Columbia, stems from a lawsuit filed July 30 against the State Department, which had agreed to allow Defense Distributed to publish an arsenal of firearms blueprints online in a planned settlement.

The states argued that the release of 3-D printable designs threatened national security and abridged states’ ability to pass and police gun laws. On July 31, Judge Robert S. Lasnik of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, citing risks to public safety, granted the attorneys general’s request.

The legal battle over weapon-design files dates back to 2013, when Wilson manufactured the first printed handgun. Days after Wilson made the blueprints available online, the federal government demanded that he remove the files. Wilson did, then sued the State Department. In June, the federal government reversed course and entered into an agreement permitting Wilson to publish his firearm blueprints online. He intended to do so Aug. 1.

Hours before he planned to publish, Lasnik stopped him.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
2 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 107723 ID: b430d1
thanks for getting opchan shut down, faggot
>> No. 107724 ID: 11855e
How come 7zip refuses to open this?
>> No. 107725 ID: 562cd0
I'd guess that the original was a PNG (lossless compression) and that there is a jpeg (lossy as fuck)
>> No. 107727 ID: 09c7e0
File 153592715644.jpg - (41.64KB , 604x453 , eb6.jpg )
as much as i like jpegs and their trippy artifacts, whoever decided to resave that pic as one is retarded and whoever reposted the image without realizing that it was fucked is is clearly not involved in 3d printing and saved the image for some other use.
>> No. 107733 ID: 8fab8a

So that means I can call it The Coon?

File 15355223703.jpg - (15.47KB , 600x281 , no4_mk1_3_9.jpg )
107717 No. 107717 ID: 959b9b hide watch quickreply [Reply]
There was a website I used to shop run by a guy with a cheesy mustache. He sells one-offs of old stuff like 1903's and military surplus like Mausers and K31s and such. He has a separate section for C&R and even Antiques.

If you buy from him, he wants you to email your credit card info and he gives you the option to email bits of it from one address and bits from another address... Because SECURITY!

I can't for the life of me remember the site, and I'd really like to.
>> No. 107719 ID: baad85
File 153553998427.jpg - (33.60KB , 131x200 , 4BE87EBB-7004-4126-9D41-23D39DD089CC.jpg )
>> No. 107720 ID: 118f4e
Never bought from him. I see the website is still Web 1.0 and looks like a 80yo granny designed it. I am surprised there are no random lens flares.

He does have some cool stock though...might just send him my C&R copy...
>> No. 107722 ID: 9dcda2
Oh this fucking guy.

> How to safely e-mail us your credit card info

> We came up with a SECURE method for those who are worried about sending sensitive information such as credit-card numbers through e-mail to do it safely. It's really quite easy and obvious...

> E-mail us your order and include your name, address, and the first half of your card number to Email1

> PLEASE DOUBLE-CHECK that the numbers are correct.

> Send another e-mail to me personally at Email2 with the order information, but include only the last half of the card numbers as well as the expiration date and your phone number. This second email address goes directly to an encrypted computer in a room that only I have access to (no one else is allowed in that room at all).
>> No. 107726 ID: d28ead
I met and spoke with him a couple months ago at his home office to make a sale to him. He is incredibly friendly and an excellent person to do business with. Very interesting man. I've ordered two rifles from him and have had them the very next day.

File 153342195624.png - (11.66KB , 229x187 , Executive_Outcomes_logo.png )
107584 No. 107584 ID: 33302c hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Finally looking into buying an AR. Been fine with a cc pistol and a shotgun in the house. Money is no object. Everyone IRL says just buy the DD AR. The jew in me says there's a better option, no?
14 posts and 9 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 107603 ID: 9dcda2
>> No. 107605 ID: 33302c

Gonna go look at the FN tomorrow, may also look at their SCAR 16.

Another fren was sucking X-95 dick. So not an AR but very interesting in theory. Might like, IDK.
>> No. 107606 ID: 9dcda2
File 15337773119.jpg - (497.46KB , 1356x1600 , arscarhcar.jpg )
I'm a big fan of the SCAR 16. It's a great shooter and the only problems I've ever had with the gun were short stroking when I put the gas regulator on suppressed, and when I managed to jam a round in the chamber backwards while trying to admin unload the gun. (Rolled snake eyes, critical miss.)

A Gesissele Super SCAR trigger is a must and I recommend some kind of rail extension. (PWS or KDG)

But, in reality, I hardly shoot mine anymore after building an AR for competition with an adjustable gas block and lightweight recoiling parts. The SCAR is heavier and has a huge amount of reciprocating mass. It's like the gun just pushes you around. A muzzle brake doesn't help much, since the brake works immediately as you fire, then some milliseconds later the bolt hits the back of the receiver and you get a thump.

Another note about the SCAR, gen 2 pmags do not drop free and need to be modified just slightly to prevent the bolt stop from riding up. Gen 3 pmags work great.

However, if I needed a straight up combat gun to fight space aliens, the SCAR would be my go-to. But if the threat consists of robots, dinosaurs, or robot dinosaurs, I grab the HCAR.
>> No. 107608 ID: 815268
Didn't Tromix do that like over a decade ago?
>> No. 107615 ID: 33302c
The FN was nice.

Whereas, I like the SCAR, I'm more familiar with the AR/M4 platform.

And the X95 felt oddly natural, and nice and short.

No. 107611 ID: 3e7755 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
OK 0p3r4t0r2zz, here's the thing.

Can anyone point me with a finger location of a fucking deactivated OR quality replica of either South African R1 rifle or Belgian FN FAL (or eventually other manufacture). I need to have it in "Rhodesian" scheme or be able to convert it into "Rhodesian" rifle for the display next year and so far I'll have better luck to fucking die than I do of a finding such rifle. Jeebus!

Gimme the fucking sauce b0ss.
>> No. 107614 ID: 3e7755
File 153420389093.jpg - (19.51KB , 480x320 , 37188673_2073401299586745_6574071359247220736_n.jpg )
Ah yeah, sorry about that gentlemen. Forgot it's SFW board.

No. 107609 ID: 9dcda2 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
  C&Rsenal - Anvil 038: What's up with my Chauchat?

And this is why TV is dead. C&Rsenal and Forgotten Weapons do a great job of cutting through the regurgitated gun rag bullshit and finding out what the real story is with these guns.
>> No. 107610 ID: 9dcda2
The episode on the Pedersen device is the definitive work on the piece.

For anyone that's new to C&Rsenal, check out the Pedersen device, the BAR, the Lewis gun episodes. They're fantastic.

File 152263585962.jpg - (2.34MB , 3500x1946 , congress006-1.jpg )
107158 No. 107158 ID: f41284 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Don't say this shit can't happen. This Bill has 174 cosponsors.

9 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 107269 ID: 89948a
File 152452527727.jpg - (1.00MB , 1209x3307 , 1403645512105.jpg )
>getting bulldozed into a mass grave by the national guard to own the libs
>> No. 107407 ID: 3eed6b
holy fuck keep gore images out, dang it.
>> No. 107566 ID: 8603a5
File 153284826599.jpg - (41.15KB , 347x638 , william_pierce_rope.jpg )

Unlikely, and besides; death is preferable to living under another AWB.

If the AWB returns, we really have nothing else to lose at that point.

Anyways, why are we letting anti-gun shills and lefties shit all over the board?
>> No. 107599 ID: e488a3
You sure showed him!
>> No. 107604 ID: 907967
>weak stomach
>on /k/
lmao someone show this noob the avra valley shoot video

No. 107511 ID: bcc5a6 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
  I'm done with .22lr all together.

I originally was looking into air guns as a replacement plinker because of .22 prices being forever inflated when I discovered big bore air rifles and learned I can shoot them cheaper than .22.

I'm now more interested in these than I am with guns considering there's not a lot to get excited about in the firearm world. While airguns are experiencing leaps and bounds in tech and they're only getting better.
37 posts and 13 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 107575 ID: e47582
Yeah, I'm sensing some rose tinted glasses. Even if it were that cheap at that time, the dollar doesn't go as far for anything as it did back then. 5 cents per round is absolutely a reasonable price right now.

Meanwhile, where are you getting 50 caliber pellets for less than 22lr prices? Best I'm seeing on them is like 20 cents per.
>> No. 107576 ID: 274941

In 2006 I grabbed a bulk deal that was less than 1 cpr. Hardly the norm, though.

For air slugs being less than .22, he has to be talking about casting, which doesn’t take into account time gathering range scrap, smelting cost, tools, and electricity/propane cost. Hardly less than 6 cpr.
>> No. 107577 ID: e35b40
In 2008, I typically paid $20 for a 525 round box of Remington Golden Bullets. .22lr is easy to find again in stores in my area, but the price has stayed up at the 8 to 11 cpr range.
>> No. 107578 ID: 81886a
Well, it's been a long time, I think it was actually the 1000rd bricks. Still cheap as fuck.

I am talking about casting. I've spent plenty of time casting boolits for muzzleloaders, I don't see my time spent on it as a monetary expense if it's simply supporting my hobby. And tools are one time expenses.

Definitely cheaper than a powder burner.
>> No. 107583 ID: 3b76e9
File 153337544919.jpg - (16.54KB , 560x199 , 08-24-15-02-Giffard-pistol.jpg )
The original CO2 guns looked good.

File 153184263794.jpg - (459.49KB , 3000x2000 , pistol French Mle_ 1935A SACM (Societe Alsacienne .jpg )
107529 No. 107529 ID: 5a1e0c hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Here we present a S.A.C.M. (Societe Alsacienne de Constructions Mecaniques) Model 1935A Pistol, made circa the 1940s. This is a semi-automatic pistol chambered for the 7.65M Longue (.32 Long) cartridge. It was developed by the Swiss Charles Petter and used by the French Army (not to mention the Nazi Germans during their occupation of France) in several wars and was the official sidearm of the French military until 1950. This single action semi-automatic pistol design was purchased by Sig, which would eventually use the patents to produce the legendary P210 pistol. The SACM, however, would go onto see combat in the First Indochina War (Vietnam 1946-54) and the Algerian War (1954-62).

The left side of this specimen reads “Mle 1935A” and “S.A.C.M.” It comes in a very nice corduroy lined brown leather holster originally made for a Tokarev.
11 posts and 11 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 107568 ID: 9bce22
>"Sunngård's concept was that in a gunfight, someone with his pistol could goad their opponent into firing 7 or 8 rounds (the typical capacity of an automatic pistol at the time), and they exploit an advantage when the opponent had to reload. Presumably, one would make sure not to get hit by any of those first 7 or 8 rounds…"

So the idea behind this was literally "shoot me and see what happens asshole."
>> No. 107569 ID: de533c
File 153290874790.jpg - (3.09MB , 5472x2582 , pistol German Borchardt C-93 (Construktion 93) Max.jpg )
Exactly. Such was the selling point of higher capacity pistols in the 1890s that touted having a few more shots than a standard revolver and in a detachable magazine that could be reloaded faster. All true, but most gunfights typically were over after only a few shots were fired.

Such as with the Borchardt C-93 (Construktion 93) semi-automatic pistol that was designed by Hugo Borchardt and Georg Luger in 1893 based upon the Maxim toggle-bolt design. Borchardt also developed the high-velocity bottlenecked 7.65×25mm Borchardt cartridge for the C-93. With about 1,100 manufactured by Loewe and nearly 2,000 more produced by Deutsche Waffen und Munitionsfabriken, the Borchardt C-93 was the first mass-produced semi-automatic pistol. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borchardt_C-93

The 7.65×25mm Borchardt had an 8-round detachable box magazine, but that wasn't much more firepower than a standard six-shooter. Pistols like the Borchardt and the 10-shot Mauser C96 were technology demonstrators that ushered in the time of the automatics.
>> No. 107570 ID: de533c
  Early Automatic Pistols https://youtu.be/t51TgOlnSSc
Forgotten Weapons - Published on Jul 21, 2011
A general look at a couple of early automatic pistol designs, and what they have in common. We have a Bergmann-Bayard M1910/21, a C96 "Broomhandle" Mauser, and an Astra M900.
>> No. 107571 ID: de533c
  Development of the Luger Automatic Pistol https://youtu.be/rIX1EL1hTmE
Lugers! there are approximately a gazillion different recognized varieties, because the pistol became so popular and iconic. And yet...they all kinda look the same, don't they? (If you are a Luger collector, don't answer that!) A great many ( I daresay the significant majority) of the Luger variations are minor changes in production details. So, what was involved in the mechanical evolution of the Luger?

Not much, really - which is a testament to the talents of Georg Luger. He got the gun almost totally right on his first try. There are, however, two major variants of the Luger mechanically - the 1900 model and the 1906 model. In this video I will walk through the differences between these two, as well as the initial Borchardt pistol that Luger used as his starting point and a couple other relevant milestones (a Swiss trials gun and a transitional French trials gun). And since they are the most common of the military models, we will also take a quick look at the German Army, Navy, and Artillery models.
>> No. 107579 ID: 9dcda2
Timely! Ian discusses the Sunngård Automatic Pistol.

File 153222524311.jpg - (88.22KB , 760x759 , regstd-may30-target2.jpg )
107547 No. 107547 ID: 5f7a01 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
This is a long shot but does anyone know of any good lectures on current european military strength? All I am finding is propaganda films with troop and equipment numbers over them. None of them go into how much of the equipment is modernized, how much is well maintained. None of them detail how many of their troops, ncos, and officers are actually combat veterans. None of them detail arms supplies and logistical capabilities.
There is always speculation but I am wondering if anyone has gone through and compiled all of this information in an easy to consume lecture or report. More specifically if they have done it since 2016.
Pic unrelated

This is a repost
>> No. 107548 ID: 577256
>I am wondering if anyone has gone through and compiled all of this information in an easy to consume lecture or report

I'm sure someone has (for their full time job).
Do you also want to know IADS postures, capabilities, and activity levels? Do you also want to know operational plans? Readiness reports?

All I'm saying is that it's a lot of important stuff and people who go to the effort of analzying it are unlikely to make it publically available.
>> No. 107558 ID: f0fb5d
What you're asking for is military geostrategic analysis. People with PhDs do that and command consultancy fees for it or write books. By the time it gets to people like you and me, it's old and watered down or generalized into stuff you can read on Wikipedia or the CIA World Factbook.

I think your best bet might be to follow the works and musings of geopolitical strategists like Thomas P. M. Barnett, formerly of Wikistrat, or George Friedman, formerly of Stratfor. Actually, subscribing to consultancies like Wikistrat or Stratfor or their ilk would probably be your best-best bet but that's probably dumb expensive to the point where only institutional entities can afford it.
>> No. 107559 ID: f0fb5d
There are also blogs and minor publications like Blogs of War and Small Wars Journal. Moreover there are policy research organizations like the Institute for the Study of War and the Center for a New American Security and others. But again, everything you're getting is always someone's opinion on quantitative, qualitative and uncertain knowledge and unverifiable facts. And nobody's focus, as far as I know, is to specifically keep track of and publicly post and objective report on the military strength of any given country or group of countries.

That's full time jobs for many highly qualified people, trying to expose things that are secretive, embarrassing, illegal or otherwise hard to pin down.

Delete post []
Report post
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]