lmao the supreme court just upheld trumps bumpstock ban and now this, its like whiplash or some shit, can i sue?

>>108370
Do you understand the difference between bump stocks and magazines?
A firearm does not require a bump stock

But some firearms require a magazine
And cartridges
And if the government arbitrarily decide 30 rounds is too many
Then they can decide 10 rounds are too many
Or
Since the average number of rounds fired is 2.2 rounds,
Then the government might decide 3 round magazines are sufficient.

>>108373
> Do you understand the difference between bump stocks and magazines?

I think the operator was joking.

> Since the average number of rounds fired is 2.2 rounds,
> Then the government might decide 3 round magazines are sufficient.

Oh! I was just reading about a shoot out where the officer was into his third magazine before the fight ended, with only 4 rounds to spare. Carried 37 rounds. Fired 33. Hit 17. (Assuming +1)

Story: https://www.policemag.com/340699/shots-fired-skokie-illinois-08-25-2008
Images: https://www.policemag.com/366839/shots-fired-skokie-ill-crime-scene

> Bank robber
> Car chase
> Robber stops car, hops out, shoots at cop
> Cop shoots back
> Robber hit 17 times with 45 AARP before going down

> "There were 17 total hits on his body including three fatal shots to his head, a couple to his torso, and one to his abdomen," [Cop] says. "Which means that even though [Robber] was mortally wounded before the head shots, he was still able to engage me.

"People don't die the way we think they do," [Cop] says. "I had 17 rounds in the guy. That will teach you how critical shot placement is."

I think this one skews the 2.2 average a little bit.

>>108373
>bump stock ban is OK
CUCK'D HARD
LMAO WHATTA PUSSY
>And if the government arbitrarily decide 30 rounds is too many Then they can decide 10 rounds are too many
and if they can arbitrarily decide how many trigger pulls per second you're allowed then they can decided that once per century is too many.

>>108369
California: Federal Court Stays “Large-Capacity” Magazine Ruling Effective Friday @ 5:00PM

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20190404/california-federal-court-stays-large-capacity-magazine-ruling-effective-friday-500pm

https://www.guns.com/news/2019/04/01/california-magazine-ban-gets-toasted-in-court

>>108416
Unfortunately, the ninth circus was going to issue a much worse stay, so Benitez had to stay his own ruling pending appeal to the ninth circus. However, only the part about obtaining more magazines after Friday's cutoff is back in effect, and people can keep the new magazines they got. Seeing as the ninth may choose not to hear this and jeopardize magazine capacity restrictions in more states, Commiefornia Penis code 32310 will probably be completely dead in a matter of weeks.

All gun laws are unconstitutional.
Those proposing infringing on same, need to spend their last moments contemplating the rock face of a nearby quarry before they are fitted with a 230 grain .45 ACP slug to the brainpan, at high velocity.

>>108444
Not all of them unfortunately, the supremacy clause in the constitution is a massive loophole which allows the government total leeway on all domestic laws including the constitution. Treaties with foreign nations can be used to "legally" take your guns and restrict your rights. There will probably be a big international "hate speech on the internet treaty" soon which will allow our government to start behaving like terminally petulant imagebaord mods censoring the whole internet. The second the senate ratifies the treaty you will be legally committing a federal felony by posting nigger, kike, fag, slav or bitch

>stationed at Fort Drum, NY aka California gun laws 2: Electric boogaloo
>Can't get my lancer AWM's from back home
>"here we'll issue these 6 GI mags but they're technically illegal here and it's kind of a grey area, so they can technically charge you if they find them"
>mfw

I hate this state so god damn much. I have to put on a brave face every day for waifu. If you want to feel the true burning rage for a liberal "utopia", just live in one.

>>108444
Truth

>>108461
>If you want to feel the true burning rage for a liberal "utopia", just live in one.
Preaching to the choir on that one. However, there are exemptions in NY for LE and MIL. I'd recommend looking into those.

There really needs to be a thorough rehash of "directives" as to how DA's can handle " the fucker broke in and I ganked him" cases.

Really if the SOB and his buddies are trying to force entry, how you repel said fuckwits is the last fucking thing the DA should worry about.
Really, do I expect to have to defend myself against" "excessive defense via flamethrower".

DA's who pull this kind of shit need to have a coarse rope around their neck.

>>108446

I doubt these politicians comprehend how much .455" I own. Let alone .303".
As far as 7,62NATO or 5.56NATO, it's best measured in "pallets".

I will share it freely, simply to confound their efforts.

>>108688
>I doubt these politicians comprehend how much .455" I own.
Lucky!
I know people who collected British firearms and they were stymied by the difficulty in obtaining ammo for them. Not only the rarities like .476 Enfield, .455 Webly Auto, .577 Snyder, and so on, but plain-Jane .455 Webley.

For UK .577 Boxer, people use rare 24 gauge brass cut down and sized to a .62 case. Some home-loaders also cut down 24 gauge brass to 2" for homemade .577 Snyder, an interesting cartridge conversion of the Enfield muzzle-loading .577 rifled musket.

And good luck to those looking for Mars ammo.
Here's a display of British fodder for you:
http://www.operatorchan.org/k/res/107749.html#107754

  Some people really get into their gun and kit collecting...
The Mk III Snider-Enfield: Introduction https://youtu.be/DJ-f11hM4Sk

>>108369