-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Subject   (reply to 33399)
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, MP3, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 15360 KB.
  • Images greater than 300x300 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 513 unique user posts.

  • Blotter updated: 2017-02-04 Show/Hide Show All

Patches and Stickers for sale here

No. 33399 ID: 667a5a
  When did this happen?
Expand all images
>> No. 33400 ID: 667a5a
  Air defense
>> No. 33401 ID: 667a5a
>> No. 33409 ID: df12a0
>When did this happen?

Bat Guano never rests.
>> No. 33410 ID: 963c4b
  Innovation Day: New Russian drones, robots, nano-armor put on display https://youtu.be/QsRKI8InDsU
Robo-tanks and RC AFVs to guard mobile nuclear ballistic missiles.
>> No. 33411 ID: 79b400
  As long as Russia has had an army.
>> No. 33416 ID: babed3
Since always.

The Russian's had unmanned, wireless tanks, ships, and planes in WW2.
>> No. 33417 ID: cfe73e
File 144768592980.jpg - (3.10MB , 2816x2112 , Russian WW2 OT-130 TU-26 teletank control vehicle .jpg )
Teletanks were a series of wireless remotely controlled unmanned tanks produced in the Soviet Union in the 1930s and early 1940s. They saw their first combat use in the Winter War, at the start of World War II. A teletank is controlled by radio from a control tank at a distance of 500–1,500 metres, the two constituting a telemechanical group. Teletanks were used by the Soviet Red Army in the Winter War, fielding at least two teletank battalions at the beginning of the World War II on Eastern Front.

Teletanks were equipped with DT machine guns, flamethrowers, smoke canisters, and sometimes a special 200–700 kg time bomb in an armoured box, dropped by the tank near the enemy's fortifications and used to destroy bunkers up to four levels below ground. Teletanks were also designed to be capable of using chemical weapons, although they were not used in combat. Each teletank, depending on its model, was able to recognize sixteen to twenty-four different commands sent via radio on two possible frequencies to avoid interference and jamming. Teletanks were built based on T-18, T-26, T-38, BT-5 and BT-7 tanks.

Standard tactics were for the control tank (with radio transmitter and operator) to stay back as far as practicable while the teletank (TT) approached the enemy. The control tank would provide fire support as well as protection for the radio control operator. If the enemy was successful at seizing the teletank, the control tank crew was instructed to destroy it with its main gun. When not in combat the teletank was driven manually.

In addition to teletanks, there were also remotely controlled telecutters and teleplanes in the Red Army. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teletank

- KhT-130 (OT-130) flame-throwing tank displayed in Russian Kubinka Tank Museum. Actually this is a TU-26 teletank control vehicle with a dummy flame-thrower. http://www.wikiwand.com/en/T-26_variants
>> No. 33418 ID: cfe73e
File 144768646963.jpg - (200.16KB , 800x600 , soe-societe-occitane-oc-003-tele-tank04.jpg )
SOE Société Occitane Adaptateur Pour Jeu TV PSU
>> No. 33420 ID: cfe73e
File 144768653610.jpg - (422.38KB , 943x772 , galaxica-occitel-003-soe.jpg )
>> No. 33421 ID: cfe73e
File 144768684915.jpg - (173.17KB , 2000x1383 , Russian WW2 T-26 teletank radio-controled flame-th.jpg )
Seventy-four years ago, Russia accomplished what no country had before, or has since—it sent armed ground robots into battle. These remote-controlled Teletanks took the field during one of WWII’s earliest and most obscure clashes, as Soviet forces pushed into Eastern Finland for roughly three and a half months, from 1939 to 1940. The Finns, by all accounts, were vastly outnumbered and outgunned, with exponentially fewer aircraft and tanks. But the Winter War, as it was later called (it began in late November, and ended in mid-March), wasn’t a swift, one-sided victory. As the more experienced Finnish troops dug in their heels, Russian advancement was proving slow and costly. So the Red Army sent in the robots.
Specifically, the Soviets deployed two battalions of Teletanks, most of them existing T-26 light tanks stuffed with hydraulics and wired for radio control. Operators could pilot the unmanned vehicle from more than a kilometer away, punching at rows of dedicated buttons (no thumbsticks or D-pads to be found) to steer the tank or fire on targets with a machine gun or flame thrower. And the Teletank had the barest minimum of autonomous functionality: if it wandered out of radio range, the tank would come to a stop after a half-minute, and sit, engine idling, until contact was reestablished.
Notably missing, though, was any sort of remote sensing capability—the Teletank couldn’t relay sound or audio back to its human driver, most often located in a fully-crewed T-26 trailing behind the mechanized one. This was robotic teleoperation at its most crude, and made for halting, imprecise maneuvering across uneven terrain.
What good was the Teletank, then? Though records are sparse, the unmanned tanks appear to have been used in combat, including during the Battle of Summa, an extended, two-part engagement that eventually forced a Finnish retreat. The Teletank’s primary role was to throw fire without fear, offsetting its lack of accuracy with gouts of flame.
On March 13, 1940, Finland and the USSR signed a treaty in Moscow, ending the Winter War. It was the end of the Teletank, as well—in the wider, even more brutal conflict to come, the T-26 was obsolete in practically every way, lacking the armor and armament to stand up to German tanks, or even to antitank weapons fielded by the Finnish. With no additional units built after 1940, the T-26 was a dead design rolling, and the remote-controlled version was just as doomed.
For a few months, nearly three quarters of a century ago, Russia led the world in military robotics. It’s a position the country would never hold again, as both Soviet and post-breakup forces have all but abandoned the development of armed ground and aerial bots. Even as recently as 2008, during its conflict with Georgia—triggered, in part, by the downing of Georgian reconnaissance drones—Russian drones were all but absent, and its air strikes were entirely manned. While Russia hasn’t shied away from open warfare, it hasn’t made robots a battlefield priority.
Until recently, that is. A number of Russian-based aircraft makers have won contracts in the past few years to build combat drones, including a 5-ton model originally slated for testing this year, and a 20-ton model planned for 2018. Military officials now hope to have strike drone capability by 2020.
And while there’s no evidence that it will ever be deployed, Russia is, in fact, home to a gun-wielding ground drone. The MRK-27 BT, built by the Moscow Bauman Technical University and first unveiled in 2009, is a tracked weapon platform, armed with a machine gun and paired grenade launchers and flame throwers. Most likely, it will go the way of MAARS, SWORDS, MULE, and other imposing ground combat bots—which is to say, nowhere. So far, the Teletank is an anomaly among robotic weapons, a precursor with no real descendants. Or none, luckily, with any confirmed kills. http://www.popsci.com/blog-network/zero-moment/tale-teletank-brief-rise-and-long-fall-russia%E2%80%99s-military-robots
>> No. 33422 ID: cfe73e
  Prototype Quadrotor with Machine Gun! https://youtu.be/SNPJMk2fgJU
Can't really vouch for the veracity of what is being displayed here.
>> No. 33423 ID: cfe73e
  Drone vs Phone: Samsung Galaxy S IV - Drone Strike https://youtu.be/jxThXvuP4Vo
In 2013, a company that makes smartphone screen protectors filmed a drone firing a handgun. Bad decisions involving armed robots are only going to get worse. http://www.popsci.com/ban-autonomous-killer-robots-inevitable
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]

Delete post []
Report post