This is why I didn't say "a drone that can do high G evasives".
We still need the human in there to make decisions that we, for now, trust humans to make. Sure humans make mistakes, but a pilot going blue on blue versus a drone going SKYNET, getting "hacked", or just fucking up because a few ones and zeroes got crossed when it saw two donkeys fucking... Pick your evil I guess. This isn't a question of the morality/ethics of drones versus humans right now.
Regardless of the answer to the actual "drones versus humans" thing, currently, we can't have a drone flying about in a multi-role 30+G evasives "fuck stealth lol" craft, we have to get the person in there. We keep the guy alive by putting him in a sealed cocoon (coffin shaped, but more form-fitted to reduce the mass of his whole thing) of fluid that's as close to his body's general density as possible. The system has a piston to induce pressure differentials in the fluid (raising or lowering the amount of fluid in the sealed coffin) to let the guy breathe and to further reduce pressure differentials during high-G maneuvers.
NASA had a guy do a 5 second sustained 32G in their tank (45 second test, he held his breath), he reported no problems. Their centrifuge couldn't go any higher.
Even with a half-tank (bathtub) and fluid up to the armpits, the test subject still holds sustained G load record without GLOC. Something like 16 or 19Gs for minutes.
With a bit of tinkering, 30+Gs should be easy-peasy. We already know computers can do flight maneuvers better than humans.
The point is that you have the computer doing all the flying, the guy inside is ONLY for route planning, target discrimination, abort call, and so on.
Message too long. Click here
to view the full text.