-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 114178)
Message
Captcha
File
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 300x300 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 543 unique user posts.

  • Blotter updated: 2017-02-04 Show/Hide Show All

File 147868224888.jpg - (22.41KB , 320x213 , holy_god_emperor_trump__350505.jpg )
114178 No. 114178 ID: 22c903
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/97336168

The constitution is safe. Our country will have a border wall to keep the filthy drug mules and their shitty welfare sucking criminal anchor offspring out. We will defund bullshit special interests. Purge the Marxism from the colleges, break up the (possibly pedophilic) democrat mafia squatting in DC, restore journalistic ethics to our press and become a non-service based economy again. Small businesses and innovation will boom in the next four years. The truth will ring long, sharp and free.

A golden age is before us folks.

NEVER COME DOWN
Expand all images
>> No. 114180 ID: 3e0c42
I don't mind all that but why, WHY, the retarded position on abortion?
>> No. 114181 ID: 22504e
Man. Did not see that coming. Thought Clinton had it for sure.




Now I have a bunch of AR mags for no reason. Lol.
>> No. 114182 ID: feb036
File 14787007678.jpg - (213.11KB , 1647x912 , journalism.jpg )
114182
>>114178
>restore journalistic ethics

You think that's actually possible?
>> No. 114183 ID: feb036
File 147870108062.png - (133.74KB , 595x530 , current year man.png )
114183
>>114182
Trudeau is gonna be eating shit even more than usual...
>> No. 114184 ID: feb036
File 14787011774.jpg - (60.95KB , 491x429 , chris shitbag evans virtue signaling hard.jpg )
114184
>>114183
...aaaand the usual pandering for cents by those dependent on handouts for whoring themslves out on the big screen.
>> No. 114185 ID: feb036
File grand_tymes_ahead_mates.webm - (1.99MB , grand tymes ahead mates.webm )
114185
and just for kicks...
>> No. 114187 ID: feb036
File 147870222261.png - (50.62KB , 500x217 , 1478701273003.png )
114187
>#I'm oppressed and disadvantaged because I'm a wombman!
>men have it easy!
>wtf is intraspecific competition?
>> No. 114188 ID: feb036
File 147870513182.jpg - (166.92KB , 658x803 , 1478699546001.jpg )
114188
>left
>equality
>we
>> No. 114189 ID: cce514
>>114182
>>114183
>>114184
>>114185
>>114187
>>114188
ah go figure our resident turkroach is happy.
>> No. 114190 ID: feb036
File 147870660249.jpg - (38.37KB , 508x370 , 1478514403191.jpg )
114190
>>114189

Fuck off. go cry and engage in mindless, impotent violence like these fucks:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=Kj8cqKBz7WY
because "democrazy" didn't go your way this time.
>> No. 114191 ID: cce514
>>114190
>burning flag
>"violence"

nice try Erdogan.
>> No. 114192 ID: 9dc901
>>114189

Your tears are delicious.
>> No. 114197 ID: 9723b1
>>114189
MMMMM MORE GIVE ME MORE TEARSSSSSS MMMM RUB IT ALL OVER MY NIPPLES OOOOH YEEEEAAAAH
>> No. 114199 ID: feb036
File 147872116357.jpg - (201.29KB , 2007x1170 , house of shit.jpg )
114199
I still can't believe regressives were on that "prince's" side only because he was calling Trump out for saying an, allegedly, awful thing about Muslims. Didn't they realize the man behind that tweet is part of a regime that executes gays and oppresses women on a level unimaginable? God, I hate the West.
>> No. 114202 ID: b86cd3
File 147872629720.jpg - (56.94KB , 640x480 , 5Z7IAZJ.jpg )
114202
>almighty god, bless our arms when the time comes
>be just as thou hast always been
>judge for thyself, whether we have merited our freedom
>lord, bless our fight
>> No. 114204 ID: 82a3e8
>>114184
He isnt wrong you know.

Also dont you speak ill of my man crush. Ill end you.

>>114199
Oh fuck me the burn is real.
>> No. 114205 ID: feb036
>>114204
>Ill end you.

Sorry, I don't take it up the ass so you can keep your AIDS all to yourself.
>> No. 114206 ID: 82a3e8
>>114205
Come on sweetie, just the tip.

Tell ya what ill even kiss your neck and MAAAYBE if you let me get more than the tip in, ill give you a reach around.
>> No. 114207 ID: 20fb9b
File 147875632764.jpg - (45.65KB , 840x439 , prmyy84ngowx.jpg )
114207
Let's talk post-game salt. I think Trump was hitting the close states that we were talking about in the /dmz/, among others, right up to Election Day. How much was Clinton rallying by contrast? She had a lot of people including Obama and Obama's wife, Biden, other politicians, and even celebrities rallying on her behalf, but I'm under the impression that was without her actually showing up to said rallies.

Currently there's a lot of bullshit being spread about the markets crashing when there was the historic opposite on the Dow. That still doesn't mean anything, though. We've never come out of the circa '08 recession and the Reserve is likely going to raise its interest rates again now that the election is over.
>> No. 114208 ID: 20fb9b
File 147875654074.jpg - (30.21KB , 591x337 , CSj03xc.jpg )
114208
.
>> No. 114209 ID: 20fb9b
File 147875704753.png - (246.52KB , 400x400 , KellyanneConway.png )
114209
She is the first woman in US history to command a presidential campaign, and win.
-----------------------------------------------
Can Kellyanne Conway Save Trump From Himself?
August 22, 2016, 6:00 AM EDT
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/can-kellyanne-conway-save-trump-from-himself

In January 2013, dismayed and defeated after Barack Obama had won his second term and Democrats had maintained the Senate, House Republicans–intact, but fraying–gathered at the Kingsmill Resort near historic Williamsburg. A GOP pollster familiar to many of them rose and addressed her mostly male audience. Stop, she urged them, talking about rape.

It’s a “four-letter word,” pollster Kellyanne Conway said, according to reports from the time.

It wasn’t that Conway wanted the party to change its position on abortion. But as an adviser to Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO) in his Senate race she had seen first-hand how he had derailed the entire party with his "legitimate rape" comments, and Conway was determined to get Republican men to think about the way they talked.

Now she may be doing it again as the female political pro closest to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, a candidate who has built a reputation as being almost impossible to get through to.
>> No. 114212 ID: d0041a
>>114178
The democrats fucked up really really badly.
Every branch of government is now in republican hands.
First time since 1928.
National Reciprocity, Hearing Protection act (silencers off NFA), SBR's off NFA, banning state AWB's everything is in our grasp now.

We can literally turn back the clock 90 years on gun control.
This is our time. On the offensive.

This is what happens when you leap to the far left and alienate whole swathes of voters, ffs she even lost the college educated white vote and the union vote
>> No. 114213 ID: d0041a
>>114207
Trump was a force of nature, for every 1 Hillary rally Trump averaged 3 or 4 during peak season. There were entire periods of time Hillary was on hiatus and Trump was out there knocking out 3+ rallies a day.

It's a problem when you have a bought and paid for biased media. Hillary got complacent, thought it was in the bag, the polling was skewed, sure but she rested on her laurels and failed to see the threat. The 3rd debate and his performance in the primary should have been an indicator
>> No. 114217 ID: feb036
File niggers.webm - (3.00MB )
114217
https://twitter.com/regated/status/796579254775463936

Will the SPLC denounce this as a hate crime, racially and politically (as if that were not the same thing...) motivated?
>> No. 114225 ID: d094dd
>NO H8! Everyone deserves equal rights!
>except people animals who disagree with us on anything
https://www.facebook.com/marissa.jenae.johnson/posts/10211107862155745
>> No. 114226 ID: b79dcf
>>114184
>last night i watched hillary clinton display everything i expect of a potus
wow that's some industrial grade horseshit.

trumps victory speech said he would be a president to ALL americans, including dems.
hillary and obamas speeches were all about how they only serve the half of the country that's liberal.

trump spent half the speech praising obama and hillary for their campaign and their past work in public service.
hillary and obama spent half of their speeches being divisive and shitting on trump.

do americans not find it fucking weird that their president, a guy being paid by 100% of the populations tax money, spent time on-duty as president campaigning for hillary clinton, a person supported by 40% of the country???!?!
>> No. 114230 ID: feb036
File 147882683276.jpg - (163.92KB , 995x597 , BLM negresses.jpg )
114230
>>114225
>> No. 114231 ID: b430d1
>triggered by social media trollshit

if you're going to spend your life being outraged by every attention whoring friendless loser on the internet, just please keep it on fæcesbook with the rest of the pro meemers and other newfags. OPchan doesn't need any more of the evangelical postings from nogunz immigrants from /pol/.

has anyone on the mod team ever though about requiring people to post at least something on /k/ before allowing them access to the rest of the site?
>> No. 114232 ID: fb3bdd
>>114226
>do americans not find it fucking weird that their president, a guy being paid by 100% of the populations tax money, spent time on-duty as president campaigning for hillary clinton, a person supported by 40% of the country???!?!
Doesn't that happen like, every election?
>> No. 114233 ID: a569d7
>>114232
Sort of. Gore actually asked Clinton NOT to campaign for him, which is the only reason it didn't happen (bad move by Gore, obviously). Other presidents were less blatant about it, by which I mean they were all "hey I just HAPPEN to be in BATTLEGROUND STATE, talking about KEY CAMPAIGN ISSUE OF MY PREFERRED CANDIDATE, but I didn't mention him by name so it doesn't count."

Anyway I don't see how the Constitution is safe in the hands of a pres who shows absolutely no understanding of it and a VP who wants to amend it to rid certain people of rights but at this point I'm pretty convinced the Constitution itself is basically just a meme for /pol/ people, it's whatever they want it to be.
>> No. 114234 ID: a569d7
>>114233
Like seriously, single party rule is bad. I don't care which party it is, it's bad. Checks and balances go out the window when there are no actual checks in Congress and are planning to pick a rubber stamp ninth judge.
>> No. 114235 ID: f2172d
Can't we all just be happy that Janet Reno is dead?
>> No. 114236 ID: d0041a
>>114226
>do americans not find it fucking weird that their president, a guy being paid by 100% of the populations tax money...

It was never technically our tax money

Him not paying taxes? It's called a call-back loss, it's good for something like 10+ years (only up to the total tax deducted) and it exists because if a company rapidly devalues they can "call" in their overpaid taxes.

Accounting 101 - literally

When your businesses lose 1 billion dollars in a particularly bad year the government is now holding tax money for capitol that isn't there. Why is it allowed? Because businesses like this have been paying millions to the government for years.

>but money always goes somewhere! Someone profited off of Trumps loss!
And they got fucking taxed for their gains. Without Callback loss you are talking about money being taxed twice - when you earn it and when you lose it

TLDR Trump called back his losses and stretched that shit as far as he could, filling in the gap with tax writeoffs including charitable donations.

This kind of blatant ignorance is indicative of the new left, and is a problem with the US as a whole, most of this fucking country including the news media is literally too fucking stupid to understand Accounting basics

I'm not even defending the guy in this case other than it's smart as fuck. I would game the system as far as I could and so would you.

>>114234
It'll be 10x worse for you if Trump is excellent and we take supermajority in the house and senate. Constitutional Amendment tier, goodbye womens suffrage.
The democratic party fucked up leaping to the far left, it has to change back to center left fast and start dumping unwinnable issues like gun control because it's a very real possibility Trump is going to do alot of what he promises and be considered the new populist reagan within 2 years. Meaning after 2 terms we follow up with another 2 term republican. A black conservative woman - because white girls are absolutely fucking worthless.
>> No. 114237 ID: d0041a
>>114236
to expand further a callback loss can refer to all of these writeoffs

Net Operating Loss Deduction - particularly of benefit to proprietorships and LLC's
http://www.bizfilings.com/toolkit/sbg/tax-info/fed-taxes/business-losses-can-generate-loss-deductions.aspx

>If the business loss exceeds your total income for the year, any unused portion of the loss can be used to offset income and reduce taxes in another year(s).


It applies to capitol gains so even you can use it - a capitol loss deduction
http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/capital-losses-can-help-cut-your-tax-bill.aspx
>> No. 114238 ID: a5507d
>>114236
>is going to do alot of what he promises
I really only trust him on 2nd amendment because his sons are pretty /based/ in that regard. For everything else? Who knows? Maybe we'll get two walls?
>> No. 114239 ID: b430d1
>>114235
i won't feel safe until bill and hillary are in prison and obama is deported back to kenya
>> No. 114240 ID: 70e1d7
just thinking about the night of the election and it was kind of off how unprepared to celebrate they were, like they were prepared to lose. trump owned atalantic city and part of las vegas, that should have been the biggest party in the universe, but they didn't even have confetti. i think trump was the most surprised person in the room, he didn't have any kind of prepared remarks (not unusual for him), but i bet he knew what he was going to to say when he lost.
and it kind of leads me to believe what i've always thought about trump, that he is an agent of the left sent to disrupt and embarrass republicans.
>> No. 114243 ID: a569d7
>>114236
>The democratic party fucked up leaping to the far left

Really? Because it actually looks like the DNC fucked up going for the center and trying to get Republican votes in what turned out to be a change election. I'm not saying Bernie could have won but Clinton's far from far left, if she was she might have kept the new Bernie voters and done better in a couple of states.

I think that's your problem. You think anything that isn't a far right republican is far left. Words mean things. You don't have to pretend someone is far left to disagree with them.

>A black conservative woman - because white girls are absolutely fucking worthless.

You realize a bit over half of white women voted for Trump, right?
>> No. 114244 ID: a569d7
>>114238
The walls aren't going to happen. I mean besides the fact that it's totally farcical to try to get Mexico to pay for the thing, even pro-tighter border experts know a literal wall isn't the best solution for most of the border. They want drones and more patrols.
>> No. 114245 ID: a569d7
>>114243
Actually... it would be great if you ran a black woman--or any woman of color, really. Unfortunately the Republicans chase away a lot of people who'd otherwise be comfortable in the party. There are a lot of economic conservatives who agree with you on that stuff, but they watch shit like what happened to Tammy Duckworth and... yeah.

It's foolish. The old Democrat racists have mostly died or retired/are retiring but the GOP ones are going to still be around for awhile. Younger Republicans seem better on this but they won't be in control for a few more years.
>> No. 114246 ID: feb036
>>114231
>if you're going to spend your life being outraged by every attention whoring friendless loser on the internet


http://www.friatider.se/svensk-s-minister-beklagar-att-m-n-fick-r-sta-i-usa

A minister of social security of Sweden, Swedish woman named Annika Strandhäll is deeply disappointed in the voting rights of American men after the Trump vote.

Annika Strandhäll says that this kind of voting results makes it very questionable that men in USA should even have rights to vote.

Maybe it is time to reconsider letting the men in USA to vote, she written on twitter.

However her comments invoked a response:
“This is a Swedish minister saying these things. But think if some white man would say this kind of thing about womens rights to vote or minorities rights to vote. It would cause enrage.”, was written by Twitter user, a black man who is no doubt very intelligent and perceptive.



>OPchan doesn't need any more of the evangelical postings from nogunz immigrants from /pol/.

/pol/ offers a better education than the institution that educated you.

>has anyone on the mod team ever though about requiring people to post at least something on /k/ before allowing them access to the rest of the site?

>call for institutionalized force to kill your enemy

I wonder...
>> No. 114248 ID: 649f2c
>>114246
>trolled by a eurofag girl from sweden the faggiest of eurofag countries

thats pretty fukken weak dude
trump didn't make the internet into your official safe space, not yet anyway
>> No. 114249 ID: feb036
File 147888841581.png - (111.25KB , 741x677 , the enemy of your enemy is still your enemy and yo.png )
114249
>>114248
>trolled by a eurofag girl from sweden the faggiest of eurofag countries
>sweden is destroyed, people are paying with their lives, souls and bodies
>"trolled"
>your daughter gets raped
>you were "trolled"
>your son gets stabbed dead
>you were "trolled"

Sure thing.

>trump didn't make the internet into your official safe space, not yet anyway

That's what your ilk has been doing for the last year or so, hunting down and prosecuting "hatespeech" on social media. Sorry, that's not me. I'm just documenting what's happening.
>> No. 114250 ID: 14e818
Five will get you ten that Anthony Wiener dies in a car accident within a year.
>> No. 114254 ID: 779032
>>114243
>>114244
>>114245

Trumps election , Brexit, the rise of nationalism, the feverish anti-islamic sentiment spreading in response to actual islamism

Globalist Multiculturalism and the multicultural state as an idea and an implementation is in decline and will come to an end. In many places it will be a violent end.

People like you and me will decide the future that it's replaced by. We can either have monocultural multi-ethnic societies that are equitable, or we can throw it all up in the air and end up with monoethnic societies, or worse - an apartheid state.
But I can tell you one thing - those that riot and burn their own cities and communities in opposition will not only be forgotten by history, they won't be around to see it
>> No. 114255 ID: feb036
>>114254
>monoethnic societies, or worse
>or worse

So what's bad about monoethnic societies again?
>> No. 114256 ID: d094dd
>>114255
Inbreeding depression for a start.
>> No. 114257 ID: 791f24
File 147899685499.png - (285.88KB , 536x400 , epic lulz.png )
114257
>In upcoming 60 minutes interview Donald Trump vows to preserve Obamacare, considers both Clintons for key positions in administration

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/12/donald-trump-on-60-minutes-hillary-clinton-couldnt-have-been-nicer/

I guess hes a uniter, not a divider.

and a ripoff artist
and a still liberal like he was in the 1990s
>> No. 114258 ID: d4c8ee
File 147900710574.jpg - (2.00MB , 4500x3199 , obamatrump2.jpg )
114258
>>114257
>now obama is my friend
>> No. 114261 ID: d0041a
>>114257
It's the 26 year old cutoff provision and the cannot deny for pre-existing condition clause, calm down

>>114255
Nothing. But the US is a little beyond that.
The best path and the path of least resistance for the US is a mono-cultural multi-ethnic equitable society.
Note I make the distinction between equality and equity. Total cultural assimilation, strict standards on who we let in, parasitic idealogies not to be tolerated.
Europe however will need to return to mono ethnic states, and there will likely be extreme levels of violence. You cannot flood a society with immigrants with an incendiary cultic idealogy that seeks destruction of other cultures, you cannot open the flood gates, make them instant wards of the state and expect them to integrate and assimilate. On the contrary they will take advantage and subvert.
They will come to the point that there will be no option but to remove them or die. In this you can expect several nations to do just that, such as Sweden.

You cannot bring an ethnic group in at replacement numbers, regardless of race or similarity to your culture. You certainly cannot bring one in that seeks the destruction of your culture de facto and expect to keep them docile with transfer payments, and bread and circuses.

Your identity isn't just your race or heritage, it's your culture and the civilization formed around that culture. It's in the achievements and the works and physical, idealogical and philosophical manifestations; it's the past and the hope for the future

The multiculti fucks, the progressives, the cultural marxists, the indroctinators, the charlatans and the degenerates: They dont give a fuck about your skin color, they'll either seek to exploit it or use it for divisiveness. They dont give a shit if you are white.
Their only goal is to destroy your culture, our culture and our civilization and replace it with party authoritarianism or worse.
The only reason why they hate you? Because you are standing in the way.
>> No. 114262 ID: feb036
>>114256
Inbreeding depression for a start.

Not sure if you are serious or just shitposting for fun but considering how often this was brought up as an "argment" by the pathologically uneducated and intellectually dishonest, you might actually believe it. The short answer is is no, inbreeding depression doesn't naturally occur sanse some catstrophic bottlenecking effect. But feel free to go ahead and explain to us how and why you believe inbreeding depression happens.
>> No. 114263 ID: ba3dd1
If anything, this election was the perfect illustration of the impotence of 3rd party candidates in the US.

They had the 2 most inept and deeply unpopular candidates in modern US electoral history, scandals were coming in left and right for both - and neither Johnson or Stein could even manage Perot levels of success. If there ever was a sign for the Libertarians and the Greens to give up, this is it.
>> No. 114264 ID: 9dc901
>>114254

>Trumps election , Brexit, the rise of nationalism, the feverish anti-islamic sentiment spreading in response to actual islamism

And of course the people pushing for multi culti diversity, tolerance and similar bullshit won't see that they bring to power clowns or racist nazis themselves.

>We can either have monocultural multi-ethnic societies that are equitable,

If you want the United States, go to the United States.

>or we can throw it all up in the air and end up with monoethnic societies, or worse - an apartheid state.

Apartheid? From who? If it's a monoethnic society where's the apartheid going to come from?

>>114256

What small island do you live on?
>> No. 114265 ID: d0041a
>>114264
The US is not mono cultural

>If it's a monoethnic society where's the apartheid going to come from?
It's not - it wouldn't be mono-ethnic. I'm implying that societies have a range of choices at the crossroads at the end of multiculturalism and one of them is a segregationist/
apartheid state

>>114264
The libertarian party, outside of Cato, is a fucking joke. Their primary process should have been a clear indicator. The greens are no better

Not only did they pick a dumbass, they failed to get 5% of the vote when it was ripe for the taking. They should have just nominated Ross Perot or the anti-virus guy.

Then again Ross Perot could end up in Trump's administration, Donald Trump was after all in (his) Reform party
>> No. 114266 ID: 9dc901
>>114265

>The US is not mono cultural

The greatest illusion of our time. Yay diversity, yay multiculturalism, while in the end it's not really. It's all the same consumerist entertainment instant pleasure society.

>It's not - it wouldn't be mono-ethnic. I'm implying that societies have a range of choices at the crossroads at the end of multiculturalism and one of them is a segregationist/apartheid state

If you're the one that I was replying to;

>We can either have monocultural multi-ethnic societies that are equitable, or we can throw it all up in the air and end up with monoethnic societies, or worse - an apartheid state.

Here supposedly the proggression of severity goes from monoethnic to apartheid. An apartheid state requires specific circumstances, which probably can't really happen in a monoethnic society. In this case the only way it could proggress, is from the so vaunted multicultural one.
What is presented as the only real option is a moncultural multiethnic society, OK why? Why not monocultural monoethnic?
>> No. 114267 ID: d094dd
File 147909836230.jpg - (19.03KB , 400x281 , 16098_010.jpg )
114267
>>114262
>Not sure if you are serious or just shitposting for fun
Latter. Half my family is from the south tho. Dad left because he almost accidentally a second cousin. Yeehaw.
>>114264
>What small island do you live on?
One of the Hawaiian islands, actually. Even still, no founder effect here.
>> No. 114268 ID: 3fa4bb
>>114266
>>114266
Specifically speaking towards the USA, if we wanted a monocultural monoethnic
society, we would have to displace or remove 30% of the population - over 50 million people
>> No. 114269 ID: b86cd3
>>114268
Gonna have to get rid of all the regional white cultures, eg, southerners, Texans, etc.
>> No. 114273 ID: a569d7
>>114268
The United States has never been monocultural or monoethnic. That's true even if you ignore Native Americans. We had whole towns speaking Spanish in the parts of the US that used to be Mexico for years and years before we up and decided that was a problem. We used to have entire communities speaking Dutch, German, Swedish, Norwegian... We'd still have the German around if it weren't for hate crimes and fear during WWI. And on top of all that you've got Catholic communities, Mormon communities, Protestant communities who hate each other...
>> No. 114274 ID: a569d7
>>114273
And THEN you have regional African cultures, like the Gullah in Georgia and South Carolina.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gullah

A lot of these things have gone away, of course. But it's a huge country. TV and internet only do so much. I mean fuck, this election sure proved a rural/urban divide at the very least.
>> No. 114277 ID: 9723b1
>Specifically speaking towards the USA, if we wanted a monocultural monoethnic society, we would have to displace or remove 30% of the population - over 50 million people
Trying to wrap my mind around this statement....

What the fuck are you talking about?

Why would we have to remove 30% of the population?
>> No. 114282 ID: 721241
>>114268
>if we wanted a monocultural monoethnic
society
>monocultural
I'D FUCKING KILL YOU ALL.

Those free stater assholes already make my blood boil. If somebody actually competent tries to fuck my state up i'm taking my rifles for a ride.
>> No. 114283 ID: feb036
File 147937021542.jpg - (56.58KB , 298x475 , Guns_of_the_south.jpg )
114283
>>114282
>Those free stater assholes already make my blood boil. If somebody actually competent tries to fuck my state up i'm taking my rifles for a ride.

If you folks keep pushing at this rate, you'll get your ride soon enough.
>> No. 114284 ID: b86cd3
Monocultural societies? North Korea, pacific islanders, Australian Aborigines, Sub-Saharan Africa.

Multicultural societies? Europe west of the Vistula, the Americas, the Mediterranean Basin, China.

Now remind us again, racialists, which of these societies have been the driving forces behind the majority of world history?
>> No. 114286 ID: feb036
>>114284

>Monocultural societies? North Korea, pacific islanders, Australian Aborigines, Sub-Saharan Africa.

>Multicultural societies? Europe west of the Vistula, the Americas, the Mediterranean Basin, China.

>Now remind us again, racialists, which of these societies have been the driving forces behind the majority of world history?

Had to save this post for posterity.

>Sub-Saharan Africa
>monocultural

AHAHHAHHA.
>> No. 114288 ID: f9fb30
>>114284
I dare you to go to a Samoa v New Zealand rugby match and tell people pacific islanders are monocultural.

Subsaharan Africa? Half a continent? Monocultural?
>> No. 114289 ID: f9fb30
>>114284
I get what you're saying--racists are wrong about pretty much everything--but you're betraying some pretty big misunderstandings in your reasoning here.

I mean besides the whole "take that, racists! You're wrong because [racist misunderstanding of anyone not Western or Chinese]"
>> No. 114296 ID: 9723b1
>>114284
>Europe west of the Vistula,
Was the pinnacle of development until it started the multiculti project.
In 1970s-80s, local hippies took the anti-colonialism attitudes of post WWII, an decided Europe "owed" shitskins housing and welfare despite elevating their dirt grubbing societies during colonial days. And when USSR collapsed, suddenly the politicians needed a new fake-noble thing to talk about, which was multiculturalism.
1990s is around the time Europe started collapsing as a society.
So... great example.

>the Americas,
America didn't allow non-European immigrants in any numbers until Obama. Mexican illegal immigrants or black and chinese slaves don't count as immigrants.

>the Mediterranean Basin,
I DON'T THINK BEING INVADED BY ARABS AND TURKS COUNTS AS "MULTICULTURAL".

>China.
Fucking what? Han are 99%.
>> No. 114297 ID: cdc490
>>114296
>America didn't allow non-European immigrants in any numbers until Obama.
What in the fuck are you smoking? Even arbitrarily discounting blacks and Chinese, that still leaves us large numbers of Filipinos, Arabs, Vietnamese, Indians, and the massive amount of Mexicans that have legally naturalized pre-Obama. America has never been monocultural. Never. Never ever ever ever ever. The German speaking settlers didn't feel like they were the same as the Irishmen and Italians when they first got here. Our culture has always been in flux, has always been made of the pieces of different cultures, it's never been harmonious, and each wave of immigrants starts feeling like "us" just in time to sneer at the new "them."

>I DON'T THINK BEING INVADED BY ARABS AND TURKS COUNTS AS "MULTICULTURAL".
First of all, why not? Second, the Mediterranean has been that way long before such a thing as a "Turk" existed.

>Han are 99%.
91.5%, but point taken.

And as to the main point, the current state of Europe, I'd say it's an attempt at mono-culturalism, not multi-culturalism, that has led to their current state of affairs. They decided to come together, put aside all of their glaring incompatibilities, and become one great big Eurozone. A few recent migrants, no matter how rapacious, aren't the ones crashing the European supereconomy.
>> No. 114298 ID: 9723b1
>>114297
>Mexican illegal immigrants or black and chinese slaves don't count as immigrants.
Learn to read.

>First of all, why not?
Why doesn't being invaded and colonized by a foreign power count as multiculturalism?

Nigger are you saying that European colonialism in Africa is multicultural, and considering the positive tone you fags are using, should be continuing?

OK lol!

>91.5%
lol fuck off.
>> No. 114302 ID: cdc490
>>114298
There are tens of millions of CITIZENS of Mexican descent, and they didn't all get here in the last eight years.

>>Nigger are you saying that European colonialism in Africa is multicultural
Duh. Invasion is how most multicultural societies have happened in history from the Roman Republic to the Crusader Kingdoms to the good ol' USofA. Would you deny that Al-Andalus was a multicultural society? I'm not touting it as positive or negative; it's just reality. Has been for millennia. Even people used to thinking of themselves as one culture are amalgamations of old blood lines. The Englishman railing against these damned immigrants is himself a hybrid of Angle, Saxon, and Norman (a historical hybrid of Viking and Frank(a historical hybrid of Gaul and Roman (don't get me fucking started on the Romans!))). You're fighting a timeless, irresistible force, friend.
>> No. 114303 ID: d0041a
>>114297
A better example of the US pre modern multiculturalism is that of a unicultural state - The US absorbed European (and only European) culture and tradition (hence burgers) while at the same time assimilating varying European cultures into a dominant American culture which was essentially a pan-European culture.
It's the reason why the united states, with a 60% - 70% Germanic white population, can go fight 2 wars against Germany/Austria within 25 years of each other when the majority of it Germanic population was barely 2 generations Americanized.

That couldn't happen today, in our multicultural state, if we had to firebomb Mexico city into dust how would the Mexican diaspora in the US respond?

>>114302
While there have been people coming in before (Eisenhower kicked out several million illegals) most of the damage was done from the 70's on, particularly in the Reagan era with Amnesty
>> No. 114304 ID: 9723b1
>>114302
>There are tens of millions of CITIZENS of Mexican descent, and they didn't all get here in the last eight years.
You're confusing citizens of SPANISH descent with Mexicans, you fucking retard.

Stop huffing that black pussy it's lowering your IQ.
>> No. 114305 ID: 1b9ff7
>>114304
The latino population of CA and TX alone is over 22 million

It is not unreasonable at all the believe there are 10 million + people in the US that are of Mexican decent specifically.

Also your comment that Europe became shit in the 70s and 80s do to multiculturalism is bullshit. The most culturally diverse country is Germany, Euro lands last economic powerhouse. The most socialist of the Europian countries are also the least diverse.


If your gona bitch about free handouts why don't we start with gutting the agri-buisness handouts for not growing crops. Or all this bullshit social security. Given that white people are still the majority in this country that means most of the program goes to old white stiffs waiting to die, free loaders
>> No. 114306 ID: a569d7
>>114296
Wait a sec. You think there weren't non-Europeans in the major imperial cities before WWII?

That's news to London, Paris and Berlin at the very least.
>> No. 114307 ID: a569d7
>>114303
>if we had to firebomb Mexico city into dust how would the Mexican diaspora in the US respond?

Well, it really depends on why you were firebombing Mexico City. A lot of the Arab American community was angry about our being idiots in the Middle East but there wasn't a shitstorm over it. You're also talking about a weird situation--in what scenario do we actually have to firebomb Mexico City?

But as to your glowing description of the plight of Germans during WWI: no, shit was actually horrible for them.

See, the German diaspora looks kind of like the Mexican diaspora here in terms of the culture still being important to them. There were a lot of German-American organizations where the dominant language was German. Kids were sent to German-language summer schools, and may have gone to actual German-language schools and churches during the year. There was a lot of German cultural activity--clubs, plays, concerts--conducted in German. German was the most spoken language in the US besides Spanish (keeping in mind we'd conquered parts of Mexico including a bunch of Spanish speakers). Germans were some of the most patriotic people in the US without losing their culture.

>everything changed when jingoism attacked

WWI brought an onslaught of social pressure and hate upon Germans. I'm talking calling sauerkraut "liberty cabbage," burning German books, ending German classes, even incidents of dachshunds being kicked because they were German dogs. Many were forced to buy war bonds. The Red Cross wouldn't allow people with German last names to join. A couple people were lynched. A lot of German families ended up changing their last names. A lot of those German organizations were closed down permanently for fear of being seen as traitors. That never came back. So yeah, the German Americans got on board... at the cost of German American culture.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-German_sentiment#United_States
>> No. 114308 ID: a569d7
>>114307
Most spoken language besides English, but you know what I mean.
>> No. 114310 ID: d0041a
>>114307
We fucked around (hard) in two countries in the middle east - How many Afghanis and Iraqis reside in the US as opposed to the greater Arab/Muslim-american population which includes Lebanese, Turkics, Saudis/Yemenis/Omani's/UAE's/Pakistanis/etc
Compare it to the Mexican diaspora in the US - if we had to go to war with Mexico, which is possible with it's destabilized nature and with the amount of Mexican citizens in the US how abundant and how much of a threat would a possible Mexican 5th column be?
There are tens of millions more Mexicans than there are Iraqi and Afghani's in the US.

Yes bad shit happened around the WW1 period, some of that cane be blamed on the propagandistic nature of the Wilson administration. Most germanic americans fled from bad times Germany/Prussia/Austria/Switzerland.
That said Germanic influence has been a close second to Anglo/Irish influence on American culture in our modern times - look at how much Germanics have shaped our culinary habits, our education system, and even our mannerisms. - Hell our current President Elect is of strong German heritage

My point is the US has always been able to assimilate foreign cultures and peoples into it's own uni-culture for the most part regardless of ethnicities. My problem with modern multiculturalism is that it foregoes these attributes. No American has a problem with tacos or latina QT's but it's not too much to ask that we can be inclusive without being overtly tolerant in the strictest sense - we take what we like and abandon the rest.
I'll also point out that identity politics are detrimental to society as a whole and only serve to propagate division and strife in a society we all yearn to perfect.
I don't need white ethno-nationalism or ethno-centrism but in the same token I cannot logically rebuke it and tolerate black/Latino/etc ethnocentric movements - and this is where identity politics comes into play. The more identity politics are pushed the more divided we are as a nation. The same can be said of radical feminism - why allow a whole gender to push for supremacy when equity is something we should be striving towards?
Hell identity politics demonizes the European without aknowledging the fact that the European and Asian races pulled the rest of the human race out of the muck of tribalism. That's not even racial superiority it's objective fact - Europeans and Asians gifted modern civilization to the rest of the world, though while not without bloodshed in many respects, uplifting the human race is no small feat

But who am I kidding the damage is already done, logic has gone out the window, there needs to be a restoration of sanity on both sides but particularly the left - I personally do not want to propagate or see a return of Tribalism - Racial or otherwise, but it seems like identity politics tries to achieve just that
>> No. 114312 ID: cdc490
>>114310
>I cannot logically rebuke [white nationalism] and tolerate black/Latino/etc ethnocentric movements
This is why I say fuck Farrakhan and Malcolm X. People need to call that shit out no matter what color it is.
>> No. 114313 ID: d4c8ee
  >>114257
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/us/politics/donald-trump-visit.html
>After stoking cries of “Lock her up!” at campaign rallies by vowing to prosecute Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Trump expressed empathy toward his former rival. He said he has no interest in pressing for Mrs. Clinton’s prosecution over her use of a private email server or for financial acts committed by the Clinton Foundation.

>“I want to move forward,” he said. “I don’t want to move back. I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t.”

>Mr. Trump suggested he has changed his mind about the usefulness of waterboarding and other forms of torture after talking with James N. Mattis, a retired Marine Corps general, who headed the United States Central Command.

>“He said, ‘I’ve never found it to be useful,’” Mr. Trump said, describing the general’s view of torturing terrorism suspects. He added that Mr. Mattis found more value in building trust and rewarding cooperation with terror suspects: “‘Give me a pack of cigarettes and a couple of beers and I’ll do better.’” He added: “I was very impressed by that answer.’’

>On climate change, he refused to repeat his promise to abandon the international climate accord reached last year in Paris, saying that, “I’m looking at it very closely.” But he said “I have an open mind to it” and that clean air and “crystal clear water” were vitally important.

>Asked about his antagonism with the news media and his vow to rethink libel laws, he told the group, which included The Times’s publisher, Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., and other executives: “I think you’ll be happy.”

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-japan-idUSKBN13B090
>"I have been meeting with so many top aides to the president-elect and also I have been meeting with the very distinguished senators and congressmen and they unanimously told me that we don’t have to take each word that Mr. Trump said publicly literally," [Prime Minister Shinzo Abe] told Reuters.
>> No. 114319 ID: d4c8ee
File 147992321566.jpg - (61.50KB , 551x340 , Cx41nKUXgAEqIrJ.jpg )
114319
>>114313
>bernie4ever
>> No. 114320 ID: feb036
File 147992446010.gif - (1.75MB , 240x180 , media against drumpf.gif )
114320
>>114302
>Would you deny that Al-Andalus was a multicultural society? I'm not touting it as positive or negative; it's just reality.

Ridiculous but what would one expect from a guy who wears your nick like a badge?
>> No. 114321 ID: cce514
>trump: *appoints Cold Warriors to advisory positions and announces plans to increase fossil fuel production*
>russians: [screeching]
https://twitter.com/BBCSteveR/status/801325888273059840/video/1
>> No. 114322 ID: 90a126
File 147995853747.jpg - (108.71KB , 630x420 , 582658f21800002e00503a93.jpg )
114322
To the people made about Donnie changing his mind, we told you so. I know for certain I and several other people here have for months, maybe years been pointing out Trump is all over the map when it comes to political beliefs, that not too long ago he was a true blue New Yorkistan liberal and besties with Hitlery, that when running he acted like a populist and did whatever was popular with voters he was trying to court.

Now he's doing the same thing with general Americans. Most general Americans probably don't care about prosecuting Hillary, either because they just don't care or they believe that media when they said Hillary dindo nuffin, it was all Russian hackers paid for by Trump who created the emails that showed she did shady shit and deleted all the thousands of emails that would have totally showed her innocence.

Same with shit like the Mudslime ban, Da Wall to keep the Brown Walkers out, and killing Obamneycare. Hopefully he doesn't walk back on other promises like protecting gun rights and looking at some of our trade treaties. While I'm hoping for that let me also hope some Lindsay Lohan clone from when she was hot magically appears in my room and she can fart hundred dollar bills and is very good at breathing through her nose.
>> No. 114323 ID: a5507d
File 147999397611.png - (12.55KB , 160x80 , Snibetisnab.png )
114323
>>114322
I'd rather have an arbitrary moron that acts on his unfiltered stream of conscious than a calculating monster that I know is going to fuck me over.

With Donald Trump it could be a 5% chance or a 100% chance, depending on the phase of the moon or if Alex Jones manages to keep the water goblins away from him.
>> No. 114324 ID: feb036
File 147999587191.png - (561.02KB , 704x493 , pepe alt right superstars team.png )
114324
>>114323
the sole point of Trump was/is to keep the presidency out of Hillary's hands. If he manages that he did his job.
>> No. 114325 ID: 90a126
File 148000977086.jpg - (32.07KB , 640x525 , ea1.jpg )
114325
>>114323
Oh don't get me wrong, Trump is most certainly a superior choice then Hillary. Hell fucking Obama would be a superior choice.

Trump is a whore willing to do what you want the way you want it so long as it makes him popular. Hillary is willing to do whatever she wants and damn the rules.

Trump is more liable to protect rights as a long as they are popular. Gun rights are popular right now so he's going to probably protect them. So are gay rights so strangely probably making Trumpster closer to a perfect candidate for me as I'm all about rights even if they don't effect me. Not gay but support gay rights, think weed is disgusting but support maryjane legalization, and have little intention of buying a fully automatic evil black extended assault clip assault machine gun but think they should be legal with little if any restrictions and no restrictions of their castrated semi-auto retarded cousins.
>> No. 114326 ID: 90a126
File 148001945374.jpg - (90.89KB , 634x612 , 31C193FC00000578-3472378-image-m-65_1456892312906.jpg )
114326
>>114324
I disagree. The point of keeping the election out of Hitlery's hand was to stop the shit she believed in from coming to pass, to stop her fast and loose method of keeping secrets, and to stop her brand of ideological idiocy. Her personally should not matter.

I don't like her, I don't like Trump. I didn't vote for the former, I did the latter probably. I don't think Obama is a bad person, seems like a nice enough guy to have a beer with if I drunk beer but I didn't vote for him because of his policies, because of the fact he was a spineless leader who anything he tried seemed to result in fail. I don't like Romney and I didn't vote for him because his policies were more or less the same as Obama despite what he said.

Just because someone is a terrible person doesn't automatically make them a bad leader. Hillary Clinton though is a bad leader, having her in office might not be apocalyptic like some predicted about Trump, about Obama, about Romney, about McCain, about Bush, and probably not about Gore because nobody gave a shit enough to quake in their boots but it would still be objectively worse then having Trump.

If she wasn't such an anti-gun zealot, if she wasn't such a email printing secrets losing corrupt career politician, if she wasn't willing to fuck over enemies and allies in her quest to the top, if she displayed even a smidgen of common sense, decency, and leadership I'd maybe have voted for her regardless of my personal feelings of her.

Trump isn't really any better but he ain't a zealot, he is a New York liberal but is atleast aware that there is more to the country then them there big ol cities with them porta-potties with the phones in em, is enough of a whore to atleast maybe possibly follow the will of the people, and doesn't seem to be the type to throw friends under the bus unless they really piss him off Chris Christie style.

Pic somewhat related, fatty man tits was probably wondering what he'd done. Not getting Trump elected but fucking up so hard with the transition team that on election night he had no plans, nothing.

And I bet the Daily Show execs were asking the same question after they hired this unfunny dumbass. I didn't agree with John Stewart alot but atleast he was fun to watch.
>> No. 114328 ID: feb036
File 148006292749.png - (169.02KB , 946x514 , just a prank bro.png )
114328
>>114326
>The point of keeping the election out of Hitlery's hand was to stop the shit she believed in from coming to pass, to stop her fast and loose method of keeping secrets, and to stop her brand of ideological idiocy. Her personally should not matter.

The shit she believes in, her handling of secrets and the law and her ideology is her personally/personality.

>If she wasn't such an anti-gun zealot, if she wasn't such a email printing secrets losing corrupt career politician, if she wasn't willing to fuck over enemies and allies in her quest to the top, if she displayed even a smidgen of common sense, decency, and leadership I'd maybe have voted for her regardless of my personal feelings of her.

Again, that is her. I have no idea how you can disassociate a person from their acts and seperate the two.
>> No. 114329 ID: 90a126
File 148006666330.jpg - (37.50KB , 342x381 , I ATE A BABY.jpg )
114329
>>114328
>The shit she believes in, her handling of secrets and the law and her ideology is her personally/personality.

My point is the goal is to stop those things, doesn't matter who its coming from. If it was Trump, Obama, Desmond Tutu, or non-crip Roosevelt advocating for those things we should be against them, regardless of our feelings on the person. If they were pro the shit we are pro for we should be against them even if we don't like them personally.

I don't like Trump personally except compared to people like Rosie O Donnel or Clinton but I think he is a superior possibility to Clinton because the beliefs he says he believes more line with my own. I'd never want to sit down and have a cold one with him, discuss how Star Wars Episode 7 was shitty, or become pen pals. He seems like a total asshole, he does not seem like a nice person. But he (allegedly) supports positions I support hence I'd support him.

>I have no idea how you can disassociate a person from their acts and seperate the two

Because ones actions and beliefs are separate from personality. The reason Obama can be a shitty President while still seeming like an okay guy, his actions and ideology is crap but his personality isn't terrible. I don't hate Obama (HERESY) but I hate his policies.

Clinton has a relatively shallow personality, mostly what you see is what you get but she still has a personality that is separate from her policies. A terrible personality. Even removing the corruption, the hatred of rights, the willingness to fuck over people and everything you'd still be left with a terrible, angry, spoiled person that is not a nice person, even if she was the greatest most rights loving transparent candidate she'd not be a nice person.

Clinton personally is terrible. It just so happens so are her policies. I think rejecting the policies is more important then rejecting the person.
>> No. 114361 ID: e07ed3
Man How could I fucking forget to get in here when the election results came out.

I was expecting hillary to win but TBH I don't think trump will be able to do 80% of the stuff he yelled the loudest he was gonna do.

I mean he won't remove 20 million people of healthcare/obamacare

He already downgraded his massive wall to a fence and a regular wall like the one we have.

Good thing is that his looking for people to be in his cabinet which are competent.

Also the salt from the media is great. Reading about how trump didn't told them he was gonna go eat food, how he didn't give them info about a press conference for his announcements etc...
>> No. 114365 ID: a5507d
>>114361
>Also the salt from the media is great.
Wait until the electoral college votes him in since people are clinging to the hope they'll decide to elect Hillary or Romney. After that we'll get another salt storm. Then after his inauguration well get the next round of teeth gnashing.
>> No. 114366 ID: e07ed3
>>114365
I just read he is considering david petraeus for secretary of state.

Greatest KEK ever wasn't hillary secretary of state when she had her email server leaking intel to every script kiddie on the internet?
>> No. 114377 ID: d842f4
Not sure if this thread's a circlejerk and I'm in no hurry to confirm or disconfirm.

Just got an e-mail:

"Dear OPERATOR,

Donald Trump has just named his pick for Treasury secretary: ex-Goldman Sachs banker and notorious foreclosure king Steve Mnuchin.

That's right. The guy who ran for office promising to "drain the swamp" is putting the living embodiment of Wall Street corruption in charge of his economic policy.

This pick basically translates to Trump giving the middle finger to his working-class voters.

...

Mnuchin was Trump’s top fundraiser, and his record is so corrupt, it's unbelievable, even for Trump. Check it out:

During the depths of the mortgage meltdown, his company OneWest foreclosed on 36,000 homes, including those of elderly retirees, using robo-signing to turn the company into a "foreclosure machine" while pocketing billions in bailout money.1

He swindled $50 million out of a media company he ran by resigning two months before the company filed for bankruptcy and using his connections to get preferential payouts.2

He made $3.2 million in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme, and avoided having to pay back the victims because his army of lawyers convinced a judge that too much time had passed before he got caught.3

He's donated more than $120,000 dollars to politicians in both political parties to gain access and influence.4
This nomination is the clearest evidence yet that Trump conned the working-class voters who supported him. And if Senate Democrats don't fight this nomination, it will only confirm the voter's belief that both sides are equally corrupt.
>> No. 114378 ID: fc8fc9
1. http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-11-22/trump-treasury-contender-mnuchin-found-profits-in-mortgage-mess

2. https://variety.com/2015/biz/news/relativity-steve-mnuchin-co-chairman-1201557256/

3. http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-06/trump-s-new-finance-chairman-was-sued-over-madoff-fraud-profit

4. https://www.publicintegrity.org/2016/05/05/19634/donald-trumps-new-finance-guru-once-clinton-donor-soros-employee
>> No. 114379 ID: cce514
  >>114377
>>114378
>IT'S ME AMERICA! IT WAS ME ALL ALONG AMERICA!
>YOU ALL BOUGHT IT! YOU ALL BOUGHT IT! HOOK, LINE, AND SINKER!
>> No. 114383 ID: 9723b1
>>114377
>just got an email
Who gains by writing this email?

>even for Trump
Ah, hello CTR.

>mortgage meltdown
Started by your butt buddy Bill Clinton, when he signed away Glass Steagal.

It was a given that Trump would have to work with evil people, dictators, corrupt businessmen, in order go get anything done. He said as much in his speeches. None of his supporters care about your attempts to demonize him.
>> No. 114391 ID: e13c05
>>114383
Are you disagreeing with me?
>> No. 114394 ID: d4c8ee
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/0f1305c8742547df9bcf978b2c15997c/trump-voter-lost-her-home-new-treasury-secretary
>When Donald Trump named his Treasury secretary, Teena Colebrook felt her heart sink.

>She had voted for the president-elect on the belief that he would knock the moneyed elites from their perch in Washington. And she knew Trump's pick for Treasury — Steven Mnuchin — all too well.

>OneWest, a bank formerly owned by a group of investors headed by Mnuchin, had foreclosed on her Los Angeles-area home in the aftermath of the Great Recession, stripping her of the two units she rented as a primary source of income.

>"I just wish that I had not voted," said Colebrook, 59. "I have no faith in our government anymore at all. They all promise you the world at the end of a stick and take it away once they get in."
113 posts omitted. First 100 shown. [Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason