|
>>
|
No. 118540
ID: 58f2b9
>>118539
>What do we need government for anyway?
Really just as a common base for legal interactions. I do believe ours has way over stepped its bounds but at a base level I don't think a large group of people can successfully manage themselves without some form of government.
>If a private association like the MPAA can regulate movies, why can't the private market regulate other things?
The MPAA is a cancer on this world but I do understand what you are saying here.
>When the TSA fingers your asshole and pulls your cock, is the real purpose to protect you or to make you feel like a degraded slave?
Would it be weird if I got a boner while they were doing that? Ejaculated?
>When people smoke now, people just call the police on them, but people in the past either took some personal responsobility and ignored smokers, moved away from smokers, or asked smokers to go somewhere else. The problem with a police state is everyone now is either or a slave or a criminal. Who pays the taxes to pay for tyranny?
Not the best example there. 2nd hand smoke can be dangerous for people and there really isn't a good way for someone who gets sick (terminal or otherwise) from it to pursue legal action against the person who caused their illness as it could be years before symptoms present. I do think the regulation of 2nd hand smoke can be a legitimate function of government depending on how they go about it.
In your effort to call out tyranny you are being short sighted.
>If smoking is dangerous, can't nonprofits raise funds to pay for educational campaigns that warn of the dangers of smoking instead of outlawing smoking?
See the above response. Your 2nd hand smoke can be dangerous to other people.
>Can't people use the BBB to verify if a business is good or not instead of forcing companies to pay fees to get a government business license?
I don't think you really understand what you are talking about here. This could be a thread all on its own if you really want to discuss it.
>Can't private charities funded by volunteer donations provide homeless shelters and soup kitchens instead of being at forced at the point of a gun by the government to pay taxes that fund welfare?
They can in most locales. There are examples of volunteer soup kitchens being shut down due to no being sanctioned by the local government though. I do believe that is wrong but can also understand the legal reasons on why this happens.
>Can't people use to protect themselves instead of relying on the Gestapo?
There is a level of shortsightedness here that is almost indescribable
>Can't neighbourhoods hire private security firms to protect their homes?
There is a level of short sightedness here that is almost indescribable
>Can't the free market provide toll roads?
>Can't the free market provide private airports?
It does actually. They just aren't as profitable as you would think.
>Can't the free market provide private schools?
It does actually. They just aren't as profitable as you would think.
>Can't the free market provide disaster relief instead of FEMA?
You have no idea what you are talking about here.
>Can't the free market run delivery services instead of the USPS?
You have no idea what you are talking about here.
>Can't the free market run railroads instead of Amtrack?
Possibly but Rail has some serious issues and would probably die out in a 100% free market.
>Think.
I am.
>https://tinychan.org/
Your crappy-chan is crappy
|
