|
>>
|
No. 119487
ID: 7448cc
File
161161927318.jpg
- (96.91KB
, 666x894
, trump_transition.jpg
)
>>119474
>"Muh Russia!"
>"People are supposing..."
>"an (((anonymous source))) said..."
>"this unconfimerd document claims..."
>blaming one man for the states' responses to a virus, and for people refusing to wear masks which was mainly due to American hyperindividualism (such hyperindividualism is not necessarily a bad thing, but it did contribute to the spread of the WuFlu)
And this has been the entire history of Trump's presidency: 4 years of nonstop slander and blaming by the press, while the dems investigated conspiracy theories. These things combined with illegal last-minute changes to voting procedures in several states due to muh-covid, and silencing of right-leaning views by "big tech" cost him the presidency in 2020. Not to mention the very real possibility of vote manipulation, as evidenced by multiple mathematical improbabilities seen during the election.
And then McConnel's refusal to support $2000 gibsmedat checks to normies at the last minute cost the GOP the senate.
Trump was ineffective, speaks like a child, and does not know when NOT to speak. But he was good, because he was the enemy of my enemy.
But back to the topic of this discussion: I am NOT advocating for any such action. But it is correct; historically, violence works. And theoretically if a movement has enough control over the press or a large enough propaganda wing, they only need about 15% of the population on their side to gain full control. This is why the current situation is so dangerous; the left is in this position, but certain additional factors exist that keep them in check.
>>119473
I'd prefer fascism, rather than a federal "assault weapon" ban and mag-cap limits.
I'd prefer civil war, rather than a federal "assault weapon" ban and mag-cap limits.
I'd prefer that we be nuked by Russia/China, rather than a federal "assault weapon" ban and mag-cap limits.
Furthermore; he was not, LEGITIMATELY, voted out.
|
