>>2148
Despite Clio routinely derailing threads to argue, nothing happens. Maybe a slap on the wrist every couple of months. The same is true with some other tripfags.

>>2154

Yeah this is one of those whiny things mentioned above.

>>2159
It's not whiny to point out a double standard.

http://www.operatorchan.org/n/res/92848.html

Such as:
>I am glad wifi now reaches the he-man womanhaters club.

Her passive-aggressiveness surely hasn't broken *any* rules ever. Nope. Nor is it an issue all threads become about her whenever women are ever to made out to be anything but infallible. Nope. Everyone who thinks Clio's shit stinks must be "butthurt" because a girl disagrees with them.

>>2201

she gets banned all the time

The one in /t/ has been marked as not requiring deletion, so the mods are in on it, too. There is no hope.

This is just bad.

The excess threads were removed, the one that stayed had some discussion in it. Which is all we ask for in /t/. Stop being such a fucking dick. Hide the thread if you don't like it, there's a button for it.

>>2160
>Growing a bit of a thicker skin would solve 99% of the reports.

lol you mods delete anything that slightly offends you (probably why activity on this site is so much less than what it used to be), so i guess this growing a bit of a thicker skin instruction is one of those do as i say not as i do kind of things.

>>2188

When a post is reported & is against the rules, what the fuck else can we do?

>>2189
His point was you guys just ignore shitposts but delete/ban anyone that disagrees with mods on other boards.

I got banned several times last year by a mod I'm not going to name that was mad I didn't agree with Gary Johnson's dumbass propaganda.

>>2190

It would help if you'd complain about it when it happened, you know.

"Once upon a time X happened" isn't exactly something we can do something about. Those that do complain tend to be in the wrong themselves 90% of the time so far though. For the remaining 10% we try to take corrective action.

>>2191
I would've complained but I didn't/don't give a shit. I was just pointing out you seem to have been missing that other guys point.

So, can the mods explain why phil's post in >>/n/92094 get a pass?

>hide phil ossifers stone threads
>ignore phil ossifers stone posts
>do not reply to phil ossifers stone posters

Seems stupid, like burying your head in the sand. It's not like they are screaming into your headset, it's text on a screen.

>>2178

IDs don't guarantee uniqueness. Nor does it guarantee you that a unique user always has the same ID. Ignoring users based on that seems a bit silly since it's very easy to change your ID in the first place as well.

>>2183

Dunno. Guess that's fixed now.

>>2181
>>2180
>>2182
He actually contributes on occasion
http://www.operatorchan.org/w/res/10147.html
And he has a different post ID in the /w/ thread, which proves how pointless the censorship idea is

As >>2184 says, just grow a thicker skin, you'll enjoy the board more

>>2186
Growing a thicker skin doesn't prevent other retards from responding to his trolling and bumping shit content back to the first page.

Works fine for everyone else.

Try with a decent client?

it's not like you're missing anything.

>>2167
It's the channel everyone needed, but no one wants.

>>2172

And so we idle.

Generally it's only used significantly when #/k/ overflows with idiocy or faggotry. Or both.

The opchan channel used to get decent traffic in the late afternoon/evening US hours but it seems like it died the last 2 months.

>>2134
What were they?

Probably the Admins should apologize to US.

>>2136
She was the best thing about that movie

>>2136

was The 'Nam comic upload there, they are available now.

-might have been me viewing the cached version or just being reviewed.

>>2140
>-might have been me viewing the cached version or just being reviewed.

Probably.

>>2134

I understand the chicken, but the piglet & severed hand are just too much, you sick bastard.

Is your ctrl key stuck? If you press ctrl it opens all links in a new tab

It's probably doing you a favor, since using the sidebar (frame) causes caching/refresh issues with most browsers. ;)

Same thing happened to me on Firefox.
You probrbly clicked "save this password on operatorchan.org" at the same time you submitted a video. Now the browser thinks that video link is your username.

>>2124
>I don't mind being called a nigger or a faggot
That's because you're both, some of us aren't though and would rather not be called that.

>Do you know what a chan is?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imageboard
>An imageboard or image board is a type of Internet forum which operates mostly via posting images.
Internet = on the internet. Forum = place where you discuss things. Discussing things = talking about them at length in a civil manner. Internet forum = place on the internet where you discuss things. Do you need a flowchart or is this getting through to you?

Posts by random operators, Chairsoft, KSM, Sneaky, Bat Guano, Ulfhunden, Clio, ST, Swissguy, CC, waffle ss, AKR, armor, doomguy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your retarded posts. Even Jotunn and native-american-broseph (z something?) has you beat and that's sad.

Is this why you're so butthurt? Because everyone else puts thought and effort into contributing and you have to strain your braincells to compete?

Step up or go back to shitchan.

>>2128
Why did you throw a bunch of names of horrible posters in there with actually good posters like BG and anonymous posters? Like, a LOT of the names you posted are of known shitposters.

>>2129
>like anonymous posters
>anonymous posters
>anonymous posters with IDs that change all the time

...Wow.

>>2133
What is wrong with being anonymous?

>>2135
I'm pretty sure he's commenting on the stupidity of calling anons "good posters." It's about as wise as saying every operator is a shitposter. You're anon, the whole damn point is that nobody can be sure if you're a dog or not.

>>2064
>Also, certainly no spammer or troll would try to take advantage of this and using multiple IPs. Nope. Not at all. Also, this idea would certainly would make /n/ a more stable place of discussion. Mmmmmmyep. /sarcasm

Accomplishing what, I must ask?

>>2076
What do trolls do? Derail conversations.

What do spammers do? Derail conversations.

"LIKE" inflating is just one way of doing this. Same as using a shitton of IPs to agree with yourself and create a hostile environment or derail a conversation. The only difference is that it's in numerical form.

The only way a liked/dis-liked feature to work, is to have each post reviewed by mod(s) and be determined if its worthy to be liked/dis-liked.

>>2121
and is relevant to the thread in discussion.

>>2121

eh... we have opinions just like everyone else.

people would just bitch that we were allowing upvotes for shit we liked, I don't see it working well.