Hey, could we have a stickied musics thread in /m/
Since it's 85% music anyways, and all the great threads die from being overlooked
Necro-bumping bumps old threads to front page?
When threads fill up with a lot of posts (such as the /dmz/ porn threads), there comes a point when adding more does not bump the thread to the front page. At what point does this happen? 600 posts? Would you rather have many smaller threads over one big thread?
Look, just lose the auto-sage. It's LAME.
Such as posting new material in an old thread. It does not bump anything off the back page and can keep a good thread going.
Such as this muscular women thread in /fit/:
It has gone beyond 200 posts and posting new stuff will not move it to the front --as it should!
>Look, just lose the auto-sage. It's LAME.
If you'd ask nicely, we might consider raising the default for all boards.
But removing it altogether is not even technically possible. And raising it too high would make the chan software choke.
Deleting something from a dump thread already tends to freeze the server for 30 seconds. Technically, there's absolutely no reason for that to happen, but the Kusaba-X software is just total trash. :)
Pretty much this, except that you actually can technically have it never sage. Line 361 in board.php. Why you would want to is highly illogical to me. Technical constraints make it such that it's a really fucking bad idea.
But I'm half tempted to implement something akin to the Touhou thread on 7chan's /h/.
Tagging of images and then pulling a list is something to be considered seeing as the robutt is displeased.
I'd be more in favor of upping the limit to 500 posts as dumping is rather popular as opposed to making more threads. Also, we don't have a shitton of traffic to IO rape the server in comparison to larger chans. Lastly, we're only using about 15GB of space total right now. The only thing that sucks is loading the threads that have more than 200 images.
Or we can sticky the muscular women thread on /pt/. I wouldn't mind. Fit fetish is best fetish.
Oops, wrong link.
Here be it:
mods pleaes ban this poster for posting anime related images and linkign to anime relate thread.(WHAT IS CONTEXT FOR 604800 SECONDS, ALEX?)(I think it's the shoulder thing that goes up.)
Why is /stem/>>3847 "cleared as not needing removal"?
It's a damn spam ad. Get your shit together mods.
Banned and deleted. Thank you for posting.
I'll look more into this.
Once again, thank you.
On that subject though....
Look, I don't think anything that goes on in the I/P conflict should be allowed to reflect on any of our board members personally. I mean hell, I use the term "Juden" all the time, and I bitch frequently about Israeli shenanigans at every opportunity. But I never use it to deliberately slap armor or AKR in the face as some did in this thread.
Yes, armor is IDF. But you know what the fuck else? He's also an OPERATOR and that shit just ain't right. Don't come in and shit his threads up and be a dickhead just because his bosses are cunts and his military has done some fucked up things at their behest. Its war - there ain't a clean hand in the whole goddamned basket.
Complaining about Israel and the IDF is muy okay, but I think using those complaints to take a swipe at one of our members should be out of bounds as trolling. My two cents.
I felt bad for armor man. If we made a thread for Vietnam Vets on Memorial Day and some hippy faggots came in and started dissing the OP with stuff from Mai Lay and shitting everything up and calling Vets babykillers and such they'd be evicted posthaste. Can we get a rules clarification that would stop that crap from happening? Just because armor is IDF doesn't mean he should have to take that crap.
Can we draw a line there? Israel criticism okay, but not when used to attack one of our members?
did you report it for "personal attacks", cause if you didn't, go back and report whatever it is has upset you and then we can see about the complaint.
but off the top of my head it seems like this such a thing would fall under the "personal attacks" rule and thus be verboten provided it gets reported.
Feel free to ignore this, call me a prude, whatever
But can we have some sort of rule in /n/ about NSFW pics? I don't think a certain user headlining his posts with BAILEY JAY TRAP pics is conducive to making /n/ a high brow forum of serious discussion.
Seconded or at least give an option to spoiler images NSFW images should stay in the hidden board.
NSFW pics are banned on all of the public boards according to the ban I got last week
Clothed pictures of Bailey Jay are not NSFW, therefor legal if in albeit poor taste. The pics have already been addressed by a mod in that thread.
This is correct, NSFW however is a bit looser here than in most places. Basically nudity and non-topical gore.
>/n/ - High Brow Forum of Serious Discussion
So fucking tempted to change the title of the page to that.
The thread was already fucked up enough - you have to admit, the reactions lightened the mood.
>Oh god the horror
>oh god, gore....
>where's his fucking leg, my god!
If I were spamming itd be different naturally.
Why wasn't this locked/deleted when I suggested it to CC?
OpChan has proven dozens of times that threads about abortion or religion turn into shit fests. Lo and behold look what's going on now.
Because it was a suggestion, I didn't see anyone reporting it, and I've continued to monitor the thread.
What's going on now is that the only noncontributory and detrimental post I've seen in that thread was yours, specifically the one after DougFir's 'do no harm' post, but other than that I'm not seeing much of anything in the way of a shitfest. It'll drop off the first page soon enough.
>What's going on now is that the only noncontributory and detrimental post I've seen in that thread was yours
>"Abortion should be mandatory for niggers"
>"Slavs are subhuman niggers."
>"One less welfare recipient."
>like 6 posts about forest people that have no relation to the topic at all
Can I get a list of approved things to say on /n/?
I'd like to avoid a wrongthink ban.
>AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHHHAHAAHAAHAHAA oh fucking lol
Laugh all you want, but at least you know you can speak about topics here that would get you instantly and permanently banned from most chans and forums.
Could you name a site that has as much or more traffic that OPchan has were you can discuss such things without the risk of being banned by some mod you never know/see/converse with?
>Could you name a site that has as much or more traffic that OPchan has were you can discuss such things without the risk of being banned by some mod you never know/see/converse with?
yes, quite a few actually.
why do you ask?
>why do you ask
Because I want to see what you consider having a higher degree of free speech and compare them for myself.
How bout them jews.
how do I do strikethrough text?
also, why is there no faq for formatting? if there is one, where is a link to it?
#strike in the email field
SwissGuy, for whatever reason, decides to give up ownership of the site to you.
What would you change on OPchan? What would you do with the site? Would you merge boards, add new ones? Change policies on moderation, or even rules?
Jesus man, learn to take a freaking joke.
Also, my "bias" against australians has been a joke since, well, forever.
Or was it Austrians, I forget now.
But basically: u better shut ur mouth u cheeky little cunt i swer on me mum ill hook u in the gabber m8
i apologize, sometimes i cant tell if your being serious or joking due to the way you have handled banter in the past
It's all banter man, it's all banter. To clarify, I don't have anything against aussies at all, it's just kind of a thing that took on a life of its own after a few years. Now gb2 /pol/
I would suspend our diamond mining operations.
>replace Cameron with "opchan admins"
There's porn spam on /w/ that's apparently been cleared by a mod as not needing to be deleted
Baleeted and permabanned for chocolate pudding.
Thank you, kind sir.