>>110041
>those are bren gun mag pouches

No they're not.

  Oathkeeper chokes a alt-right member in Huston. Apparently what happened was the alt-cringers false-flagged themselves by spreading a bunch of rumors that anti-fascists were going to tear down a statue of Sam Huston in a attempt to get the antifa to show up and start a fight, but the only people who showed up were them and the oath keepers. The oathkeepers are now being decried as "boomer antifa."

>>110056
Sam Houston opposed secession and was removed office by a pro-confederate coup. And despite being a slave owner he repeatedly opposed the expansion of slavery in the US when he was a senator. A odd choice for lost causers and neo-nazis to rally around.

>Let me tell you what is coming. After the sacrifice of countless millions of treasure and hundreds of thousands of lives, you may win Southern independence if God be not against you, but I doubt it.

>>110058
I feel kinda bad the man died in 1863. Having worked so hard to prevent civil war, he didn't even get to see the end of it.

>>110056
"this isn't comic-con"

heh

>>110087
>How do you estimate the prevalence of homebrew, moonshine, smuggled alcohol, surrogate alcohol etc. when calculating per capita alcohol consumption?
>every four houses outside of the cities have vodka distilleries
I'm pretty sure that some sort of distiller can be found in any large enough neighbourhood in rural area. They don't produce vodka, though, it's not an industrial thing. However, as far I am aware, the last time the average distiller was in use is probably around 15-20 years ago, if not in the time of prohibition 30 years ago. Consumption, naturally, has been dropping and evolving during recent years, along with improvement of living standards - vodka is no longer a popular drink any more. It's not as beofre cheap either.

Though, on the flip side, there's a problem with medical-use alcohol, some of which can be sold unregistered or unchecked, or even counterfeit. And there have been some incidents involving improperly produced liquids, with casualties. How do other countries manage and account consumption of "non-recreational" liquids? Back in the USSR alcohol was at some times more scarce then the others, thus a lot of legends of people actually drinking "everything that burns". The idea of "alcohol culture" as a "national treasure", which is supported widely on international level and by "independent" organizations, actually hurts the situation as much as social problems do. People have learned to fight it.

Obvious problem with WHO is that they try to account everything by one standard value, because practically it is impossible to use any other method on international scale. Every country has it's own management, laws, data manipulation, local traditions and so on. I have no idea how would any country account anything beyond simplest figures, if they don't have strong excise policy, monopoly on production or something like that. If that wasn't enough, there are even more "experts" and "empirical data" to be introduced to final figures. And then these numbers are introduced to news agencies, who are so unreliable, they can use legends, stereotypes and hopelessly obsolete data on regular basis.

>>110091
>15-20 years ago
Well, maybe 10-15. The numbers on the graph is the amount of death caused directly by alcoholism (not by some wild speculation on domestic violence). Still, I'm not entirely sure this is true.

See, it is a simple idea, people used to say that overuse of alcohol kills hundreds of thousands every year, because they wanted more efforts to be diverted to "fighting alcoholism". And it did not work because nobody would believe them, even if (and when) they lie for the better principles. Also, there's common governmental practice of spending billions to solve some problem while really there's no effect in reality. Also there's commonly used principle that economically "useless" population should be able to get rid of itself by their own efforts, so that big business would save on social security. And so on - if you dig a bit deeper, it turns out that nobody REALLY is concerned about the problem the way they should be.

It is only a collective will of the people that can solve this stalemate, only personal responsibility that can lead a person from self-destruction, only a complex government strategy that can fix the situation where individuals drown their problems in the cup. No other fucking way ever works. Now those of you, kiddies, who din't know these simplest matters, can go on and whine about Russian hackers and immigrants and other first world problems, I won't bother you with explaining them in the same manner.

>>110091
>he's posting the "America killed more people than the holocaust because the soviet union collapsed" chart again

>>110094
>white men dindu nuffing wrong
Oh, here's this guy again.

>>110096
>whitey tries to play the race card

>>110076
thats a butt-ugly dog yo

>aussie and german

>cant be beat

>pointy ears above a big brain

>what a treat!

>>110069
I'm looking at dogs like these and cocker spaniels.

They're cool with my allergies.

>>110081
She a cute. CUTE!

>>110086

Lord Buckethead's 2017 Manifesto.

  Brexit II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) https://youtu.be/fyVz5vgqBhE
In the wake of a divisive election, the UK will begin the process of leaving the European Union. John Oliver and an intergalactic space lord propose a plan.

  Lord Buckethead could have used the organization of the Silly Party apparatus to make a better showing in the election.
Election Night Special - Monty Python's Flying Circus https://youtu.be/kJVROcKFnBQ
In the lead up to the 2015 UK general election, Michael Palin suggested we add the 'Election Night Special' sketch to the channel, so here it is. The sketch, which was originally featured in Episode 19 of 'Monty Python's Flying Circus' and aired on November 3, 1970, parodies the coverage of the UK general elections, specifically the 1970 general election, on the BBC. The candidates include the 'Sensible Party', the 'Silly Party', the 'Slightly Silly Party' and the 'Very Silly Party'.

I would definitely take Tarquin Fin-Tim-Lim-Bim-Whin-Bim-Lim-Bus-Stop-F'tang-F'tang-Ole'-Biscuitbarrel over Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump any day.

  The Monster Raving Looney Party - UK General Election 2017 https://youtu.be/reNq7vnS1CU

The beard is nice and all, but we all know mustache is where it's at.

True operator tier.

>>109973
YER MOU-STASHE IS GROWIN BEYON' THE CORNERS O' YER MOUTH!

POH LEES DAT MOU-STASHE!

Jokes aside I'm glad you're doing good, man.

>>109974
Hitler stache is reg. (I didn't get a pic of that)

Yeah, things are really starting to pick up for me. Had a date last night with a 100% convincing trap. Went good.

And I'm setting up a date with a guy that's so good looking that all my female friends are mad. Hopefully personality is good.

>>109984
The hotter they are, the likelier they are to be batshit, so tread lightly.

Good luck, and if you do happen to land on one that's remotely sane, goddamn fuck you better smash that shit like it's my nipponjin Locon doujinski goodness.

>>109985
She seemed surprisingly chill, but that was a first date. Will wait for judgement. But HNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGG BECKY LEMME SMASH

Keep an eye on the front trunnion and rear of the receiver for cracking, as long you aren't doing anything illegal your dog should be fine.

>>109921
>io ak
Inter Ordnance?

What's the problem?

>>109933
Everything.

>>109921
200% fucked, let us know what breaks first of that piece of shit.

>>109915

I send the trolley over the single person, saving the three people.

>>109915
Shotgun and ammo would be 75% buckshot 25% slugs. Then we'd both walk out in the open in view of each other, and look for who cloned us 'cause he's got answers to our questions. Maybe get a beer after or something.

>>109918
>pic

>>109918
>>109919

  >>109918
Answer to trolley question is always multi-track drifting


>>109915
The question sounded better in my head :(

>>109915
Easy peasy. Id give my clone the shotgun and take the pistol.

Im shit with shotguns historically

>>109886
>>109887
stick a pressure washer or a high pressure, high volume hose in there and blast it with piss

>>109888
yep, that's a transformer
check'd

>>109889

>yep, that's a transformer

It's dead, Jim.

>>109891
Blow it up. To make sure.

>>109889
Considering that I'd be working from the uphill end of the pipe, I'd potentially be blasting it with water and then trying to wet vac it back out or something. I haven't even been able to find the downhill end of the pipe. We had a quick thunderstorm last evening, and there isn't standing water in the hole I dug, so maybe it's magicking itself back to working.

>>109909
Nope. Still just as clogged as it had been.

Neighbor lady's son-in-law pointed out this small hole in the bank of the creek and said that's where the pipe comes out. However, I dug it out a good foot and a half to two feet into the hillside and found no trace of pipe. So either he's wrong or it rusted away to literally nothing.

Supposedly, the county screwed up the creek when they put in a sewage line crossing the creek, through the path of the water, causing the level of the creek to rise a good foot or two, allowing the creek to block the exit of the drain pipe with mud.

I think it would be feasible to cut a ditch from about half to two-thirds the way from the wall to the creek, and just tear that section of pipe out and have the rest of it empty into the ditch. This should keep the end of the remaining pipe above the level of the creek. However, neighbor lady's daughter was having none of it. (Neighbor lady is 81, so not making many decisions for herself.) This situation has been going on forever, and they've basically just accepted it.

Supposedly, the family knows everyone in the county courthouse and several members are taskmasters (?) in some unintelligible local organization. So hooray there.

Son-in-law did confirm my suspicions that the basement flooding and the water that flows through the garage are the results of groundwater. Not sure if we could put in a pipe to try and collect it and direct it elsewhere, or how expensive doing that would be.

IR selfie.

>>109304
Yep, this is also why when you see a person dicking around with a thermal camera/lens/scope on youtoob or some such you'll see reflections of the person in their windows and shit.

  Zoltan Danis presentation on the 1999 F-117A shootdown, with English subtitles courtesy of a Serb on 8ch/k/.
https://8ch.net/k/res/493071.html


Predavanje Zoltana Danija o obaranju aviona F-117A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvgyiFCoG0U

>>109857
tl;dw: Air Force repeatedly sends aircraft down the same goddamn corridor every mission, Serbs use a IR camera to see when one is coming and then do basic math to find the intersection of two objects of unchanged velocity to volley fire SA-3s into the air until one of them gets close enough to trigger the proximity fuse.

>>109304

It can still be useful to have an idea on which parts of an engine are heating up faster than the surrounding parts. (and i'm obviously not talking of the cylinders)
That way you have some idea where the loss/inefficiency in the system is.

Obviously not a solves-all solution, but it can help you get situated.

the republicans are doing tons of things for gun owners, your NRA donations are well spent. remember that silencer thing? yeah it got dropped because paul ryan's tax laws take precedent after the president's healthcare bill, but it was still something.

>>109825
I hope that guy who ordered a few hundred thousand dollars worth of suppressors for his gun shop who was 100% convinced it WOULD pass and he was gonna make a shitload of money selling suppressors isn't feeling burnt.

>>109835
Probably feeling like all those gun store owners who ordered massive stocks of ARs right before the election because they thought Hitlery would win and they'd make metric asstons of money, loads of it.

Now they are sitting on stock nobody is really buying and what little they are selling they aren't making much profit on.

http://www.pressherald.com/2017/03/05/sales-of-guns-and-ammunition-plummet-since-trumps-election/

the sad part of this that guns are one thing that the whole republican party agrees on and could pass quickly with the help of the few reliably pro gun democrats. all that other tax & healthcare shit isn't going to go anywhere.

>>109836
it used to be that some gun owners were upset with the NRA for being too pro-industry & not an actual gun owners rights organization (which is total bullshit, sometimes supporting the owners requires supporting the industry, life is complicated especially byzanitne to the mandarinth power DC politics)
now they're complaining that the industry isn't getting enough support? you can't have it both ways. part of why the NRA isn't as effective as it could be is lack of grassroots support, they really need you to reach out to your dudes & ask for legalized 20mm shit, lower fees, full auto, etc. or whatever the fuck it is you want changed. just paying the fee doesn't buy all that much in terms of the amount of cocaine & hookers required to make something happen in washington, they need further assistance.

>>109825
>>109835
>>109836
Did the Hearing Protection Act actually get dropped? I mean, it's not a priority, and even if it were, the odds still aren't great, but it's still a work in progress.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/367

http://www.guns.com/2017/05/04/hearing-protection-act-on-the-move-but-facing-uphill-struggle-video/