-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

Name
Email
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 300x300 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 656 unique user posts.

  • Blotter updated: 2017-02-04 Show/Hide Show All

File 146514329551.jpg - (22.84KB , 236x321 , only fucks 6'4%22 niggers.jpg )
105688 No. 105688 ID: 649f2c hide watch quickreply [Reply]
>you mad virgins

Campus sexual assault scandals have practically become routine. The most recent one to make the news led to the firing of the head football coach at Baylor University and the resignation of its president. A new study, published this week in the journal Violence Against Women, suggests that sexual assault by college men is an even more widespread problem than the scandals imply.

In an online survey about sexual activity and attitudes, more than half the men who played an intramural or intercollegiate sport reported coercing a partner into sex. Of the sexually coercive behaviors listed on the survey, including "I used threats to make my partner have oral or anal sex," almost all met the legal definition of rape.

A total of 379 male undergraduates from a single large, public, Division I university in the Southeast volunteered to take the online survey. Of that total, 159 were members of recreational, or club, sports teams; 29 were intercollegiate athletes; and 191 were non-athletes. Having to rely on subjects from only one institution was an unavoidable limitation of the research, according to the scientists.

[1 in 5 female undergraduates said they were victims of sexual assault or misconduct in 2015]

Prior research has indicated an outsize proportion of sexual violence cases on campus are committed by intercollegiate athletes. This new survey examined the previously unexplored population of intramural athletes, those who play recreationally and are the largest group of undergraduate athletes nationwide, and found that the risk factor for those club athletes was not significantly different from that of intercollegiate athletes.

"I actually was surprised," said lead author Belinda-Rose Young, who acknowledged that many scientists think intercollegiate athletes are at greater risk because they tend to be isolated from much of the rest of the university community.

"That leads to sexual violence," she said, "because of the closed environment. They are in separate dorms, separate classes ... and there's that constant reiteration of male superiority and athletes who are rewarded for being aggressive. That’s the reality. But we saw that that attitude is just a part of the general sporting environment."
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 105713 ID: 604010
File 146518920280.jpg - (30.45KB , 305x225 , Media_bush_confused.jpg )
105713
•Over 50% of college athletes are rapists
•Over 50% of college athletes are niggers
>> No. 105715 ID: e52ae7
Pretty sure I'm not the only athlete on OPchan.
And if I recall, while the pussy was plentiful, the flow did not even come close to the volume of available ass.

Was this troll post tailored to wizardchan?

>Campus sexual assault SENSATIONALIST LIES have practically become routine.
Fixed that for you, thank me later.


File 146401395973.jpg - (41.29KB , 509x339 , TET082.jpg )
105515 No. 105515 ID: c05e32 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Thinking about the current refugee crisis abroad got me thinking about a time in our own nation's history when we took in a massive wave of war refugees. Other than the fall of Saigon and some of the horrors the boat people faced on their voyage, I'm almost completely ignorant of the trials and tribulations of America's Vietnamese immigrants. I know the result: we've gained a demographic known for their industriousness, small business acumen, and the best sandwiches of any culture on earth (a delicious, filling lunch for $3.75, are you fucking kidding me!?). But I don't know their struggle was or what measures we took to accommodate them. Are there any parallels to current events or lessons that can be learned and applied?
27 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 105639 ID: 9dc901
>>105576

It's unrealistic to expect ethnic cleansing. I think the more real possibility is to expect more Breivik attacks as people get fed the fuck up.

Along with the current shitlam attacks, maybe at an increased pace.

Couple it with more restrictions from governments as they try to clamp down in all the wrong places and you get a not very enjoyable future for Europe.

For your scenario to unfold we'd need an extreme case such as an economic crisis that doesn't resolve for a long while (and I mean a real economic crisis, not the 2008 type). Then civil wars and maybe some totalitarian regimes.
>> No. 105643 ID: f87148
>>105639

You're probably right, bearing in mind the collective character of the contemporary European; but hey, a girl can dream, right? And, in any event, I was merely postulating a workable and sensible course of action, rather than communicating my expectations of what will actually occur.
>> No. 105684 ID: 9a6cc4
File 146510585037.jpg - (48.01KB , 480x360 , REBELLION INTENSIFIES.jpg )
105684
>>105639

The more realistic scenario, I think, is that the system will either work or devolve.

If it works, the public will get fed up to the point where hard-right regimes will be elected on a platform of getting rid of the refugees. Mass deportation, essentially. If the regimes choose to fight this for the sake of political ideology, as in by repression or, more likely, by granting the refugees voting rights in order to prevent the election of an anti-refugee regime, the situation will devolve. Likely into violence. I think in even the best case, we're going to see a lot of Europe break down into a sort of "Northern Ireland during the Troubles" sort of fight, where the two sides fight it out in the streets on a day to day basis while the governments try to keep the violence contained by clamping down on personal freedom.

Shit's gonna be bad.
>> No. 105701 ID: b430d1
File 146517187327.jpg - (75.50KB , 1024x576 , 70ED3D6A-879D-48C9-AFC4-3F5C4DB7D4F6_cx0_cy10_cw0_.jpg )
105701
Not supporting Islamic terrorism is Russophobic.
>> No. 105714 ID: e59f1a
File 146520349570.png - (103.29KB , 420x420 , 419961fec6bf7ee15174d62790ac1c81.png )
105714
>>105701


No. 105606 ID: 254d85 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
  So anybody watch the Libertarian presidential debate?
http://www.c-span.org/video/?409916-1/libertarian-party-holds-presidential-debate

>"You shouldn't be able to sell heroin to a five year old."
>[sporadic booing from audience]
4 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 105628 ID: 8be205
>>105627
>that ANY government is terrible,

See, that's anarchism. Dislike of official, organized government. Thats not libertarianism.

A lot of the definition of political stances and parties shit revolves around small fine-toothed-comb government method details and where a national governing body's social responsibilities to the citizenry begin and end. And I side with libertarians, the government should not nanny and care for it's citizens; that's your own fucking job.

Sadly, the welfare state has become too entrenched to remove in any double-term limit libertarians have decades of work to push through congress in order to unfuck the whole social nanny system the democrats have fucking sledgehammered into place in American society.
>> No. 105629 ID: 90a126
File 146481624922.gif - (27.87KB , 238x300 , no-exit-libertarianism-anarchy-for-rich-people-238.gif )
105629
>>105628
>See, that's anarchism. Dislike of official, organized government. Thats not libertarianism.

It is part of it though. Even basic libertarianism wants government as small and ineffectual as possible. Libertarian anarchism wants no government at all. See stuff like anarcho capitalism...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism

>the government should not nanny and care for it's citizens; that's your own fucking job

The government should not nanny citizens but I disagree with caring for them when needed. A society that cannot care for it most vulnerable and needy citizens is a society doomed to social unrest, abuse of power, human rights abuses, and probable collapse.

Allowing people to care for themselves when they cannot care for themselves through whatever circumstances will result in people attempting to care for themselves by become true parasites. A person who cannot find a job, cannot support their family will turn to crime, an old person who has no money to live through their twilight years will either die quietly and badly or go out as dramatically as possible, the mentally impaired with no social safety net will be extreme dangers to themselves and others.

Helping them not be so desperate, not be willing to kill and die for food and money, is a net positive for society.
>> No. 105630 ID: 53e7c0
Actually one of the precepts of democracy (that's the concept, not the political party) is that government *is bad*, and is not a friend of the people. It's a necessary evil to live in a modern society.

In the true "textbook" model, the free market economy and the government are essentially 2 faces of a coin. The government's job is only to intrude upon the market when there are problems that can't be managed by the market alone.

That being said, even John Adams wrote at length on the "Tyranny of the Majority" and specific safeguards were put into place to counter that, and tribal mentality, mob rule, etc.

Anyway, real talk, no the stuff about "Apriori-stic Equality" is crap, populism, entitlements and corruption have eroded and severely undermined democracy in the US, and the very size, scope, and bureaucratic nature of government work against democracy.

Pure democracy is logistically unsound.
It assumes an educated, involved electorate. W're getting a voter turnout rate in the 30s in off year elections.

It also assumes that: If every voter prefers alternative X over alternative Y, then the group prefers X over Y.
AND: If every voter’s preference between X and Y remains unchanged, then the group’s preference between X and Y will also remain unchanged.

Democracy isn't perfect, even in the Framer's minds, but it was preferable to any other form of government.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 105683 ID: 9a6cc4
>>105621

This is the case with a lot of people I know.

Libertarianism has been kept to the fringes of American politics for so long that they bred their own small stock of fundamentalist. Absolutist Libertarians - basically the equivalent of the Democratic Party's SJW wing.

Libertarianism, taken in moderation, would probably be the most ideal form of government from a freedom standpoint. But the key word is moderation.
>> No. 105689 ID: f49edb
https://popehat.com/2016/06/02/libertarianism-as-ten-questions-rather-than-ten-answers/


File 14647678222.png - (11.94KB , 260x260 , creative-guilt.png )
105624 No. 105624 ID: 5e8be9 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
So I logged onto eBenefits today to check on my BDD claim. I haven't gotten anything in the mail yet but according to the site my claim is processed and I'm rated 70% disabled. Basically that is ~1300 a month until it is time for me to be reevaluated by the VA and such.

I'm pretty happy actually. My right ankle is fucked. It hurts all the time and I walk with a kinda shamblely limp because walking normal frankly hurts way too damn much. Only way to fix it is some not so minor surgery that would pull me out of the work force for way too long and may not fully fix it.

Now I doubt it was just my ankle that gave me the combined rating of 70%. My hearing loss was just shy of profound, my back is so messed up my last few months in I got med-downed (basically even if I had reenlisted the chances of me flying again were low), and I have some significant sleep problems from spending so much time yo-yoing my sleep schedule (~2 years of not being consistently on the same shift for longer than a week, 12-on/12-off 6 days a week for >1year, meeting the flight schedule, etc.). But I wasn't expecting this.

I feel pretty guilty. Like I'm fucked up but I'm still holding down a full time job. So long as I pop a few naproxen in the morning I can get through the day even if I have to move a whole bunch of vinyl rolls. On bad days I smoke a bowl and chill in my recliner right after work. Not the best life but I'm functional. I know guys who had to appeal just to get 20-30% who are so physically fucked up they straight up can't do labor work anymore. I feel like I'm getting more than I deserve here...
7 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 105636 ID: 5e8be9
>>105635
Already started classes this 10 week summer semester. Glad I did the paperwork for using it before I got out. Took forever to get everything in line.

My big life thing right now is buying a home. Being a home owner is the SW of Virginia is way cheaper than renting unless you're cool with having 2-3 roommates.
>> No. 105638 ID: e517e3
>>105632
>better than being addicted to muscle relaxers

Do you mind me asking if/what you're prescribed? Might be worth looking into a lower (250mg - 350mg seems to be the standard or average) dose prescription of Carisoprodol (commonly known as "Soma").

It's a skeletal muscle relaxer and particularly helpful for those with joint/muscle pain. It gets a bad rap by some docs and by the FDA/DEA. A lot of that has to due with the age of the drug (it's old as hell, been around since the early 1950s), people popping high dosage pills like candy for decades on end, and Vicodin/Percocet junkies using it in combination to snort it to "enhance" their "high." So some docs don't like prescribing it, hence further labeling it. It's actually not that addictive chemically (taken alone), especially considering its effectiveness. It's also not a narcotic.

It does have some complications with opioids, but opioids themselves can have complications on their own anyways. I've taken it as a supplement for about ~10 years now. For anyone with joint pains, it's a blessing. There have been days where I've barely been able to walk because of my knee fucking up and taking a single 350mg pill will keep me going for the rest of the day and into the night. I can't even fathom how someone could not be in sanity-crippling pain and have to take three of those same fucking pills a day.

Best muscle relaxer I've ever taken. Does the job when Naproxen can't. Works better (for me) than even the opioids I've been prescribed in the past and doesn't hit me nearly as hard as they do.
>> No. 105640 ID: 5e8be9
>>105638
I don't have anymore but whatever it was it was one hell of a good time. Like too good of a time. And I couldn't take it during the work week. Shit fucked me up good and made me barely functional. Got a funny story about being too high to get out of my chair at work (squadron) but still directing the shop since I was the Desk Sergeant. Actually got a lot done that night.

Really helped my back (which is fucked up due to my limp and flying) but did fuck all for my ankle. Really I have yet to take something that actually helped the ankle pain. I've just gotten used to it. Like even if I'm high I can still feel it but I just care much less about it.
>> No. 105650 ID: e517e3
>>105640
That's the thing I like about Carisoprodol. It does it's job, but doesn't put you in a haze, unless you do so on an empty stomach. When I take one, I just take it alongside breakfast and a large cup of coffee. You can tell you're "medicated" as in something is affecting you, but it's subdued in the way like caffeine is. It's merely in the background. It's not like being drunk or high, thankfully.

It's difficult to describe how well it works. Back and neck pain which was debilitated instead feels like you just had an adjustment or snapped your neck back into place. Sometimes I think 350mg isn't even necessary. A lower dosage might be just right, especially if it's a regular medication thing.
>> No. 105671 ID: 5e8be9
Got the letter from the VA today...was surprised...

10% for tinnitus, but nothing for hearing loss
70% for insomnia - not that they talked about insomnia in the explanation much. They (QTC examiner) seem to think I'm violent/anti-social/paranoid. I always saw my self as a less violent Marine though.

Denied for everything else, they noted I was treated for my ankle and back but that they weren't bad enough for a rating. I'm guessing this is because I was still downplaying how much pain I was in when this claim got filed. I didn't get taken off of flight orders and start PT for my back until January. Basically waited until I got winged before I finally really bitched.
Not sure if it is worth the frustration but I'm gonna try to find a VSO and file an appeal. Not because I want more $$$$ (I'm already getting way more than I think I really deserve) but because they denied things that really bother me and that I was seeing a doc for.

Funny the thing is that what isn't well documented in my medical records is the thing they drop 70% on. If I ever got diagnosed with insomnia while I was flying it would have been an instant med down with me probably coming off of orders entirely. Even at the QTC appointment about it I downplayed my sleep problems just in case it could have possibly made it back to my flight doc.


File 146400986858.png - (0.99MB , 1489x897 , Capture.png )
105514 No. 105514 ID: e9c0bd hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
so is getting a double feed a common problem with the scar?


also discus video by vice...... because i hate militias i would much rather see community organization groups like the VFW or the Lyons club, something with the similar ideals that militias tend to talk about to news cameras without the element of disorganization, fear , and general fuckery or stupidity.


however i think Tatar 21 summed it up best in the comments with "This guy is such a little bitch" also the congressman at the end fucking terrifys me, he definitely doesn't have an agenda or is stuck with his own small view of what this nation is and how its people act.


https://youtu.be/lU9THDZ2S5k - <the video407
9 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 105613 ID: 79b400
>>105611
>>105612
That's what happened? Shit.

They used to be my favorite news source, they would just report on things with no opinion thrown it. It was incredibly interesting to watch, especially when they would focus on socially taboo subjects.

Then I started seeing opinion pieces and other political shit thrown into the mix and it made it unbearable to watch.

I miss old Vice...

We should copyright "Old Vice", have Terry Crews market it, and just have an unbiased news agency for once. We'd have Terry Crews travel to exotic lands and hot zones and just scream "explosions! Coming at you from Old Vice!"
>> No. 105617 ID: f87148
>>105613

FUND IT
>> No. 105619 ID: a569d7
>>105617
>I'm ignoring you so much I'm making a special post just to make sure you know I'm ignoring you
>> No. 105620 ID: f87148
>>105619

>Clio

Discarded.
>> No. 105623 ID: 037541
>>105613
>>105617
They'd probably sue you for trademark infringement. Like they are doing for the unsigned band ViceVersa because it's name is 'likely to confuse consumers.'

http://www.aux.tv/2016/04/vice-bullying-unsigned-band-viceversa-into-name-change/


File 14645777588.jpg - (345.84KB , 968x648 , sugar grove.jpg )
105601 No. 105601 ID: df12a0 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/1-million-will-buy-you-an-entire-west-virginia-town-693774915953
>> No. 105603 ID: 028b36
File 146458241210.png - (11.62KB , 662x238 , Lottery.png )
105603
> Anyone Got $1 Million..?

Working on it
>> No. 105604 ID: 254d85
>former naval base

So basically: asbestos, lead paint, black mold.
>> No. 105607 ID: 90a126
File 14645940316.jpg - (109.90KB , 800x533 , tumblr_lqrbvnNda01qgwmggo1_1280.jpg )
105607
But its West Virginia, who would want to move there? ;)

Seems like every few years entire towns go up for sale which is kinda cool I guess.

Even if I had a million I probably wouldn't want it unless it had something cool like some old Cold War era bunker or something equally cool.
>> No. 105609 ID: 0fa6d7
>>105601

There's a reason for the "no cellphone reception" comment:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_National_Radio_Quiet_Zone

>>105607
>Even if I had a million I probably wouldn't want it unless it had something cool like some old Cold War era bunker or something equally cool.

U.S. Navy's Information Operations Command (NIOC) was part of ECHELON. You can bet your ass you'll find some bunkers.
I'd expect a bunch of hardened datacenter bunkers out there at least.

>In April 2013, the Chief of Naval Operations ordered that the site be closed by September 30, 2015, as "a result of the determination by the resource sponsor National Security Agency to relocate the command’s mission.”
>As of 2016, part of the base has been transferred to the General Services Administration for sale, while another part of the base, to the south, continues to operate.

They aint entirely gone yet, though.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.


File 146365187063.jpg - (850.67KB , 2064x1161 , 20160514_153843.jpg )
105449 No. 105449 ID: f0afdb hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Cooper's Rule #4: know your target, and what is beyond it.

And don't get careless and slap a pistol-range steel target with m193.

The ricochet caught me in the throat. If I hadn't been leaned over a hood at the time, I'd have bleed to death from a torn-up artery instead of the fragment traveling down my neck and ending up in the meat.

It'll stay there unless it starts causing trouble.

Big ups to Porncop and Hoolahoop for doing their first aid thing on me.

Y'all stay safe out there.
27 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 105580 ID: 9dc901
File 146440563542.jpg - (14.71KB , 324x324 , you.jpg )
105580
>>105579

>im tired of you're ignorance

Oh the irony :D

I am European. And this picture might help you.

Did they sign a waiver? Did the "range" have warning signs? We don't know, but we can guess based on the presented. It looks like a bunch of dumb shits having a grand ol' time to me. Why? Because a range would probably have a range warden to tell them what they're doing is stupid and therefore not allowed.
>> No. 105584 ID: 840548
>>105580
>European

explains the butthurt and jealously of muh rights.

>Did they sign a waiver?
>Did the "range" have warning signs?
>Because a range would probably have a range warden

no you fearful pussy. not every 'range' needs you're elitest rigamoral guidelines.
now I wonder if you are a woman.

>you're
>your
>omg selective quoting omg prosecute him
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 105589 ID: 798a48
Stop it, fellas.

Soren, I don't know if you're still reading this, but it's good to know you're around and that you're doing okay.
>> No. 105595 ID: 9dc901
>>105584

Lol.

Jealous of what rights? What can you get that I can't? What exactly do you have that I don't? The only difference is you can get it somewhat cheaper.

>not every 'range' needs you're elitest rigamoral guidelines

I guess that picture didn't help at all.

>now I wonder if you are a woman.

And to this guy being responsible is elitist. If you don't do stupid shit you're a pussy European and a woman to boot. Got it.
>> No. 105602 ID: df12a0
File 146457915874.png - (21.06KB , 338x497 , pokerface.png )
105602
>"One single moment of carelessness."

>vitriol ensues


File 146232677097.jpg - (136.19KB , 565x377 , 98593.jpg )
105229 No. 105229 ID: 81e283 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Not sure anyone remember my old thread about putting together a /k/alendar with non-nude girls with guns and gears. Some people like the idea and some really hated it.

After putting it on the back burner and putting more thoughts into it. What about a /k/alendar with models still with guns and gears but some of the typical /k/ rage stuff - like finger on the trigger, tea cupping the pistols, mag inserted backward basically just meme fileld /k/alendar.

Comes with at least 3 ~ 5 things wrong with each picture and answer on the one of the day block. Still going to have /k/ related dates noted on the calendar - like D-Day, Pearl Harbor, John Browning and Mikhail Kalashnikov's birthday and now we can add Dead Bin Laden day.
10 posts and 6 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 105352 ID: e9c0bd
put in that one fucking pic of max
>> No. 105354 ID: 028b36
File 146302670972.jpg - (69.84KB , 679x1024 , KAC PDW.jpg )
105354
>>105352
Is it bad I know which one you are talking about? naked and with Fire bird logo tattoo on the butt pic

with his permission of course lol
>> No. 105436 ID: 5d583f
>>105354

>>with his permission of course

Yeah we wouldn't want to post A NAKED PICTURE WITH HIS FACE THAT HE WILLINGLY UPLOADED KNOWING THE REPERCUSSIONS without his fucking permission now would we?
>> No. 105437 ID: 5d583f
>>105436

Oh yeah I forgot to mention his rancid fucking teeth that are literally school bus yellow.
>> No. 105438 ID: ad8094
File 146350842776.jpg - (38.45KB , 620x385 , add-hue-saturation-whiten-teeth.jpg )
105438
>>105437


File 14633812878.jpg - (112.10KB , 625x524 , barry-obama-smoking-a-joint.jpg )
105420 No. 105420 ID: 656579 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
should obama legalize drugs?
>> No. 105423 ID: f49edb
the chief executive has no authority to change laws
>> No. 105425 ID: 0dcdc8
File 146340769680.gif - (1.14MB , 371x209 , cHuxntp.gif )
105425
>>105423
What?! When did he change that?

I could totally see him giving up that power though as he leaves office to totally screw over following republican presidents ability to unchange his laws.


File 146309952915.jpg - (40.22KB , 627x638 , 11866276_1048228731877467_6397615063568716090_n.jpg )
105356 No. 105356 ID: 8be205 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Iss okay to use offshore accounts as a rich fuck now, because fucking Hermione Granger did is so there are no legitimate reasons for doing it, iss totally cool maings.

http://tinyurl.com/jlmvney
For those with misgivings, tinyurl links to a CNN Money article on a statement from Emma Watson's publicist confirming yes, Ms. Watson used Mossack-Fonseca to set up an offshore account in the Bahamas. But it's totally for privacy and not being a rich prick or anything like that like all the old white guys in the Panama Papers.

Picture very possibly unrelated.
1 post omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 105365 ID: 20f52b
All this racket with offshore accounts has been rigged from the start, and it is no-brainer to figure out why.
>> No. 105380 ID: 254d85
>Obscuro Dinero! *taxable income disappears*

>Harry Potter and the chamber of CAYMANS HOLDINGS GROUP INVESTMENT LLC
>> No. 105381 ID: 90a126
File 146318727059.jpg - (135.55KB , 1280x720 , McMurphy_intro.jpg )
105381
>Emma Watson

I'd hide my money in her offshore accounts if you catch my drift.

I'd give her the benefit of the doubt compared to rich old white business dudes with similar accounts. She ain't running some vast company that has pay taxes and she does have actual privacy concerns. Very few paparazzi are going to be interested in the financial statements of some random CEO anymore then they'd be interested in nip slip pics of them.

Watson is a celeb that has to go to extreme lengths to protect all aspects of her life including her finances. So her having some relatively anonymous offshore account isn't exactly shocking.

>>105365
>rigged from the start

Get out of here Matthew Perry and take your hideous coat with you!!!!
>> No. 105382 ID: 8be205
>>105381
i'm not saying she's guilty of anything, i'm just laughing at the white knighting all over facebook and the news outlets, defending emma and now saying there are plenty of legitimate reasons to use offshore accounts, when only last week people were decrying and defaming the use of offshores and screaming for blood from anyone who used them.

Blatant and unapologetic double standard and "muh feminism" strike again.
>> No. 105383 ID: 90a126
File 146319410047.jpg - (96.82KB , 830x962 , totally real totally.jpg )
105383
>>105382
To be fair of the people the masses were baying for blood for were like politicians, pig fucker politicians, and rich bitch business tyCOONs.

Emma Watson is just some snoggable movie twat who rode some long hard shafts. She is considerably different then someone who handles money for a living especially the publics money.

Its not about feminism or anything. Not too many people were upset when it came out Jackie Chan was doing the same shite, mostly they were asking the same question as Emma of whether or not he was doing something illegal. Nobody cared Emilio Estevez was named in the Panama Papers but then again nobody really cares about Emilio Estevez.

The same cannot be said about people like David Cameron or Bill Gates because again they are far different then actors.

Now that said I'm sure there is some white knighting involved from giant lardasses who have body pillows in the shape of Hermione who would probably defend her if she walked up to somebody on the street and stabbed them but in this case they are correct to defend her, a case of a overweight diabetic clock being right twice a day.


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason  
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]