-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

Name
Email
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 300x300 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 709 unique user posts.

  • Blotter updated: 2016-01-30 Show/Hide Show All

File 132985394688.jpg - (914.45KB , 2352x1568 , BMW-F800S-LimitedEdition2010-RightFrontLow.jpg )
1 No. 1 ID: e63b69 Stickied hide watch quickreply [Reply] [First 100 posts] [Last 50 posts]
Post it if it's yours and gets you from point A to point B!

No post without picture.
385 posts and 377 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21417 ID: 76ac9a
IHC and Cable hooked me up with a '91 Geo Metro.

I love it.
>> No. 21418 ID: 76ac9a
File 147899853579.jpg - (1.57MB , 3264x1836 , 20161112_134919.jpg )
21418
Oops, forgot pic


File 148137303715.png - (9.20KB , 259x224 , 6.png )
21460 No. 21460 ID: f4514f hide watch quickreply [Reply]
http://cutt.us/kd2P
http://cutt.us/nuWYL
http://cutt.us/jg37Y
http://cutt.us/MW31U
http://cutt.us/sT7O
http://syka.zz.mu


No. 21450 ID: b86cd3 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
  S-300 strong, A-10 kaput, F-35 kaput.
4 posts and 3 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21455 ID: eefa98
File 148112117558.jpg - (168.37KB , 1275x1024 , US bomb AGM-86 air launched cruise missile (ALCM) .jpg )
21455
US AGM-86 air launched cruise missile (ALCM) in flight.
>> No. 21456 ID: eefa98
File 148112175732.jpg - (244.82KB , 1280x813 , US bomb AGM-86 ALCM on a B-52 Stratofortress 1.jpg )
21456
US AGM-86 ALCMs on a B-52 Stratofortress.
The old B-52 can carry 20 of these things, but the bomber is ancient and the missiles were first fielded in 1982 and are probably obsolete. Development is being done for the Long-Range Stand-Off (LRSO) weapon, I would imagine.
>> No. 21457 ID: eefa98
File 148112189020.jpg - (578.26KB , 2820x1850 , US B-52G w AGM-86B air-launched cruise missiles (A.jpg )
21457
In 2007, the USAF announced its intention to retire all of its AGM-129 ACMs, and to reduce the ALCM fleet by more than 500 missiles, leaving 528 nuclear cruise missiles. The ALCM force will be consolidated at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, and all excess cruise missile bodies will be destroyed.

The reductions are in part a result of the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty requirement to go below 2,200 deployed nuclear weapons by 2012, with the AGM-129 ACM chosen because it has reliability problems and also higher maintenance costs.

Even with the SLEP, the remaining AGM-86s were to reach their end of service by 2020, leaving the B-52 without a nuclear mission. However, in 2012, the USAF announced plans to extend the useful life of the missiles until at least 2030.

The USAF planned to award a contract for the development of the replacement Long-Range Stand-Off (LRSO) weapon in 2015. Unlike the AGM-86, the LRSO will be carried on multiple aircraft, including the B-52, the B-2 Spirit, and the Northrop Grumman B-21. Like the AGM-86, the LRSO can be armed with either a conventional or nuclear warhead. The LRSO program is to develop a weapon that can penetrate and survive integrated air defense systems and prosecute strategic targets. Both conventional and nuclear versions of the weapon are required to reach initial operational capability (IOC) before the retirement of their respective ALCM versions, around 2030.

The technology development contracts were to be submitted before the end of 2012. In March 2014 a further 3-year delay in the project was announced by the Department of Defense, delaying a contract award until fiscal year 2018. The House Armed Services Committee moved to reject this delay. The delay was caused by financial pressures and an uncertain acquisition plan, and allowed by the long remaining service life left for the AGM-86 and lack of urgent necessity compared to other defense needs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-86_ALCM

- An air-to-air front view of a B-52G Stratofortress aircraft from the 416th bombardment Wing armed with AGM-86B air-launched cruise missiles (ALCMs). 1 March 1988
>> No. 21458 ID: b86cd3
>>21452
>jamming
>"cyka blyat inertial navigation and home-on-jam doesn't exist and the Americans surely haven't responded to our jamming of GPS in Ukraine and Syria!!"
>> No. 21459 ID: 70d38f
File 148123238141.jpg - (42.80KB , 480x322 , cavemen-food-nutrition.jpg )
21459
>>21458
>inertial navigation
>home-on-jam
>jamming of GPS
I don't think that caveman technology is worth something these days.


File 147901608580.jpg - (158.41KB , 1231x1668 , CxBDUGtWQAg5Yl3.jpg )
21419 No. 21419 ID: d4c8ee hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
The Russians seem to be having some trouble with their carrier again.
13 posts and 9 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21442 ID: 70d38f
At least it does not have severe problems with engines if some soot gets into the machine room. Not sure if it is the case for modern marine vessels.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/24/royal-navy-type-45-destroyer-towed-back-port-two-days-sailed/

>A Royal Navy Type 45 destroyer has been towed back into port just two days after it sailed following a total propulsion failure while taking part in Nato exercises.

>But the 4,500 tonne hi-tech ship limped back into Plymouth on Wednesday under tow and shadowed by three additional dockyard tugs as well as the Ministry of Defence police.

>The incident is the latest in a series of electrical failures which have plagued the Type 45 fleet and forced the Navy to admit that all six destroyers need major repairs.

>In October 2016, Duncan, escorted by the frigate HMS Richmond, was dispatched by the Ministry of Defence to intercept and "man-mark" a fleet of Russian Navy vessels, including their flagship Admiral Kuznetsov, which were passing through the English Channel on their way to Syria.

Probably a close proximity to the Kuznetsov did not remain without consequences for the ship.
>> No. 21444 ID: b86cd3
>>21442
The post-WWII Royal navy is about as much of a joke as the Russian navy.
>> No. 21447 ID: 70d38f
>>21444
For that matter, every other modern navy (except you know what navy) is pretty much the same.
>> No. 21448 ID: d4c8ee
>>21444
Eh the RN's issues are more political in nature. During the Falklands they operated against a enemy with modern ASMs and trained pilots. If they had kept their single flat deck in service until then it'd have been more one-side, or perhaps wouldn't have even happened due to the threat of F-4s and Buccaneers. And they've maintained a credible submarine fleet which has had few accidents.

Anyways, the Admiral Musora Barzha has ceased operating aircraft.

http://www.janes.com/article/65775/russian-carrier-jets-flying-from-syria-not-kuznetsov
>Many of the fast jets that were embarked on the Russia aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov have been flown to the main Russian air base in Syria, Airbus Defence and Space satellite imagery obtained by IHS Jane's shows.

>The imagery shows eight Russian Federation Navy Su-33 and one MiG-29KR jets alongside various Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS) aircraft at Humaymim Air Base in Latakia province on 20 November.

>Kuznetsov can carry around 20 fast jets and is known to have embarked at least eight Su-33s for its current deployment in the Eastern Mediterranean, and at least four of the new MiG-29KR multirole fighters for the first time. One of the new jets crashed on 14 November, an incident that a Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) statement attributed to an unspecified "equipment fault during an approach for deck landing".

>The Russian news website Gazeta published an article on 21 November that cited a source knowledgeable about carrier operations as saying that the MiG-29KR was circling Kuznetsov due to a problem with one of the carrier's four arrestor cables when both its engines failed, forcing the pilot to eject.

>The MoD indicated that there were no problems with Kuznetsov's flight operations on 15 November, when it announced that its aircraft had carried out airstrikes against targets in Syria. It released video footage showing Su-33s loaded with unguided bombs and taking off from Kuznetsov, but the MiG-29KRs were not seen flying, hinting they may have been grounded after the crash.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 21449 ID: b86cd3
r-r-russia strong!
https://theaviationist.com/2016/12/05/russian-su-33-crashed-in-the-mediterranean-while-attempting-to-land-on-kuznetsov-aircraft-carrier/
>Military sources close to The Aviationist report that a Russian Navy Su-33 Flanker carrier-based multirole aircraft has crashed during flight operations from Admiral Kuznetsov on Saturday, Dec. 3.

>According to the report, the combat plane crashed at its second attempt to land on the aircraft carrier in good weather conditions (visibility +10 kilometers, Sea State 4, wind at 12 knots): it seems that it missed the wires and failed to go around* falling short of the bow of the warship.

>The pilot successfully ejected and was picked up by a Russian Navy search and rescue helicopter.

>Considered that on Nov. 14 a MiG-29K crashed while recovering to the aircraft carrier, if confirmed this would be the second loss for the air wing embarked on Admiral Kuznetsov in less than three weeks and a significant blow for the Russian Naval Aviation during its combat deployment off Syria.

>*Update: the Russian MoD has confirmed the incident. According to an official release the arresting wire snapped and failed to stop the aircraft.


File 145509803147.jpg - (3.51MB , 2560x1920 , 032.jpg )
19808 No. 19808 ID: 6853a3 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-35436741

To commemorate the end of Land Rover Defender production, in this thread, we will post military Land Rovers.
Starting with this WMIK.
24 posts and 23 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 19885 ID: faf5b0
File 145573667657.jpg - (1.22MB , 1500x1012 , Land_Rover_Defender_110_patrol_vehicles.jpg )
19885
>> No. 19886 ID: faf5b0
File 145573670352.jpg - (87.76KB , 630x362 , Land Rover UK commandos.jpg )
19886
beep beep
>> No. 19887 ID: a19011
>>19886
"WHAT HO PEASANTS!"
>> No. 19893 ID: c9e27b
>>19824
Unfortunately I have no photos of Pink Panthers and have never seen one IRL.
>> No. 21446 ID: 1c7a30
File 148067597425.jpg - (886.67KB , 2160x1440 , land-rover-s2-109-sas-pink-panther-10-fg-31.jpg )
21446
>>19824

https://www.sas1946.com/main/index.php?topic=16521.0


File 138828227854.jpg - (1.49MB , 1800x1553 , 507bd.jpg )
14997 No. 14997 ID: 1f64a0 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Last 50 posts]
For I am considering a 49cc scooter. I hate them. I hate them so much for being slow and dangerous. And not being as comfortable as a motorcycle.

But, I don't have to pay insurance on them, they're fuel efficient, cheap to maintain, and I can get a decent one for around $1000. If I get one, I can actually attend school and work, maybe even a second job which would help me afford a real vehicle (currently thinking of a Japanese econobox of some sort).

I'll hate myself for it, be terrified every time I'm on the road and will have to take the back roads everywhere, but it's a stepping stone to getting my life on track. And it's 1000 times better than the bus. Fuck the nasty bus with a schedule designed by Sheniqua.

But, goddamn, I'm not looking forward to taking one out on the street.
74 posts and 45 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21406 ID: 43f860
File 147837467979.jpg - (190.98KB , 1920x1200 , motorcycle Mini Scooter E Concept (2010) 1.jpg )
21406
>> No. 21407 ID: 43f860
File 14783747121.jpg - (198.36KB , 1600x1200 , motorcycle Mini Scooter E Concept (2010) 2.jpg )
21407
>> No. 21408 ID: 43f860
File 147837474491.jpg - (193.13KB , 1600x1200 , motorcycle Mini Scooter E Concept (2010) 3.jpg )
21408
>> No. 21409 ID: 43f860
File 147837511638.jpg - (188.04KB , 1600x1200 , motorcycle Mini Scooter E Concept (2010) 4.jpg )
21409
>> No. 21445 ID: 6e9743
  Hey, this tiny, one-man car is powered by a 49cc scooter engine!
The Smallest Car in the World at the BBC - Top Gear - BBC https://youtu.be/dJfSS0ZXYdo
Jeremy drives the Peel P50, the world's smallest production car to work at the BBC and meets a few famous faces along the way.


File 145686585625.jpg - (1.67MB , 2592x1944 , KIMG0233.jpg )
19982 No. 19982 ID: a70f76 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Last 50 posts]
Celebrating /v/ surviving the revamp, let's talk about the latest repair/replacement/upgrade/any maintenance whatsoever we've had to perform on our vehicles.

On my way to work this morning, my rear end slumped out of nowhere, no apparent cause. I thought I had a flat initially, but started to realize that it was my shocks after experiencing no handling issues.

Limped into work, looked at it for a few minutes, had to clock in, then 2 hours later during my 15 minute break, I pulled the side panels off and discovered this. Apparently the retaining washer broke and the shock came off the bushing and was wedged between the exhausted and the frame.

Thank God, it's an easy fix and I work in a shop, plenty of tools at my disposal. Loosened the exhaust, freed the shock, realigned it and stole a washer from the Grainger box to reattach it and even reinforced it.

I spent that two hours stressing about the possibilities, thinking I was going to be spending more money or missing work.
57 posts and 15 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21433 ID: 471393
File 147966767221.jpg - (2.15MB , 3264x2448 , 20161117_132522[1].jpg )
21433
>>21431
Huh. Wonder why no trip.

Ah, well. VW in question. This here's the shifter linkage on that retarded machine. Which needed to be removed to get the steering box changed.
>> No. 21435 ID: 7e827c
>>21428
Several reasons.
1)They look nicer and provide a nice contrast to the wrinkle black.
2)We have a shit-ton of them, we buy them in bulk.
3)I wanted to.
>> No. 21436 ID: 7e827c
>>21431
Not all of us have the hate-on against allen heads that you do.
>> No. 21437 ID: 0de47d
>>21436
I don't mind them, as long as they're kept clean. But once they're packed with 30 years worth of oil and grease it's game over. Now IHC wants to punch babies, rape old people and take up smoking again.
>> No. 21443 ID: 7e827c
>>21437
They aren't that damn hard to clean out.


No. 12861 ID: abf330 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Last 50 posts]
  >sounds
thread
83 posts and 7 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 19923 ID: edd03a
  No Country for Unprepared Anuses.
>> No. 21297 ID: bc78c2
  .
>> No. 21353 ID: 6ca38e
  One of my favorite /k/ related videos where the audio is concerned:
>> No. 21379 ID: bc78c2
  Turkish jets successfully causing terror and panic with sonic booms in Istanbul and Ankara during coup attempt
>> No. 21434 ID: bc78c2
  nice


File 147116235676.jpg - (55.97KB , 575x431 , 22467790004_large.jpg )
21172 No. 21172 ID: 17c524 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
>Driving shitty 1991 Suzuki Sidekick
>Get pulled over
"oy vey not again"
>cop comes up, asks for the stuff
>hand him debit card on accident
pasta.jpg
"your break lights are out"
>believe him
>he runs paper work
>asks if any drugs or guns
"oh hey wait, your tail lights do work. I guess."
>gets awkwardly serious about how beautiful the desert is.
>1000 yard stare and everything
"you drive back to the city safe now, the drivers here are crazy"
20 posts and 6 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21412 ID: a90ce2
File 147898111252.jpg - (1.04MB , 2307x1108 , car, Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme 1978 1.jpg )
21412
>>21411
A 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme?
Interesting first car.
>> No. 21413 ID: a90ce2
File 147898208029.jpg - (248.82KB , 2048x1536 , car, Dodge Charger Super Bee 1971 2.jpg )
21413
I remember a spoiled rotten kid in high school, back in 1985, who said his Dad was giving him an early '70s Dodge Charger Super Bee. And he did not think this was a big deal because it was 15 years old or so. Ingrate bastard! Son of a BITCH!
>> No. 21414 ID: a90ce2
File 14789821423.jpg - (252.18KB , 2048x1536 , car, Dodge Charger Super Bee 1971 3.jpg )
21414
>> No. 21415 ID: a90ce2
File 147898224197.jpg - (501.31KB , 2048x1536 , car, Dodge Charger Super Bee 1971 4.jpg )
21415
>> No. 21416 ID: a90ce2
File 147898282081.jpg - (763.32KB , 3006x1872 , car, Dodge Charger Super Bee 1971 5.jpg )
21416
1971 Dodge Super Bee: the Last Bee
Originally appearing as a more advanced version of the super successful Road Runner, Super Bee used the same recipe – take a simple cheap model, install a V8 engine as powerful as possible, and that’s it. Coronet model has been taken as a basis. The recipe worked quite well until 1971, when Coronet lost two-door versions. Then, in the case has entered the body from the then-produced Charger. That’s why the 1971 Dodge Super Bee is unique – is in fact the last classic Super Bee and the last used concept of a simple, cheap, but powerful muscle car.

Despite the fact that the Super Bee was positioned as the affordable muscle car (the cheapest 1971 Super Bee cost $3,300), the engines were not weak, and in fact in no way inferior to the more expensive and advanced competitors and “relatives”.

Super Bee of the 1971 model year was the first and only model with the base engine small block V8, just 5.6 liters of displacement, however producing enough power – 275 HP. Then ordinary big-block V8 engines were avaialble: 383 cubic-inch (6.3L) producing 300 HP; two 440 Magnum (7.2-liter) engines, producing 370 or 385HP (due to different settings and fuel system).

Hemi engines, which widely used on another muscle cars made by Chrysler corporation, could be installed in Super Bee only optionally. Nevertheless, it was the most powerful modification, producing 425 HP, with 426 CID of displacement. http://carswithmuscles.com/1971-dodge-super-bee/


No. 20292 ID: 9dcda2 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Last 50 posts]
  Northrop F5 Freedom Fighter HD

I want one.
59 posts and 38 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21234 ID: e222c7
>>20292
There was a small shitstorm in the news here in Norway a couple of years ago when the air force sold off two fully operational F5's to Ross Perot Jr. for 120,000 NOK (roughly $20k) a piece.

That's so affordable even I could have bought one.
>> No. 21236 ID: 8effed
File 147233369174.jpg - (381.21KB , 1280x838 , US F-5A Norwegian Freedom Fighter & F-4D Phant.jpg )
21236
>>21234
$20,000 for a Northrop F-5? Get a car loan and pick that up!
Reminds me of hearing some executive talking about buying a used Ferrari for cheap, but the maintenance was more expensive than an airplane.
- A U.S. Air Force McDonnell Douglas F-4D Phantom II aircraft of the New Jersey Air National Guard flying in close formation with a Royal Norwegian Air Force Northrop F-5A "Freedom Fighter" aircraft during exercise Coronet Rawhide on 1 September 1982.
>> No. 21373 ID: 9dcda2
  >>20292
I didn't know the Vietnam war was so fun and wholesome.
>> No. 21376 ID: cce514
File 147572922839.jpg - (130.01KB , 1181x787 , 1*onXE1-sIduWVC2_XvMpKcw_jpeg.jpg )
21376
Ethiopian F-5s vs Somali MiG-21s.
https://warisboring.com/which-is-better-the-f-5e-tiger-ii-or-the-mig-21-e92e5c5a1ef3
>> No. 21400 ID: cd5ece
  Some slav shit. Pretty cool, actually. A different perspective from what we're used to.


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason  
Previous [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]