-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

Subject   (new thread)
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 300x300 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 674 unique user posts.

  • Blotter updated: 2017-02-04 Show/Hide Show All

Patches and Stickers for sale here

File 149840760540.jpg - (47.37KB , 800x566 , Rabbit Season.jpg )
21730 No. 21730 ID: b6523d Stickied hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
General car discussion thread

>post your car
>post other people's cars
>post dank maymays
>get derailed by Bat Guano
>ask questions
>get answers
21 posts and 15 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21920 ID: 5d4aa3
Responding to a dead post kinda

There's another problem with gear driven systems, they have no slack in the system. Think about the torque being exerted on drivetrain components during a harsh downshift. In a a belt or chain system, there is some small amount of bounce that is taken up by the tensioning system. Performance suffers, but with a gear system, and especially on straight cut gears, all the load can shear a tooth. The best performance, and guaranteed to hold valve timing, but an extra failure point for race cars.
>> No. 21937 ID: 61e76a
What's the engine? Like a 1.2L or something?

File 132985394688.jpg - (914.45KB , 2352x1568 , BMW-F800S-LimitedEdition2010-RightFrontLow.jpg )
1 No. 1 ID: e63b69 Stickied hide watch quickreply [Reply] [First 100 posts] [Last 50 posts]
Post it if it's yours and gets you from point A to point B!

No post without picture.
415 posts and 406 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21966 ID: d82311
File 159780674897.jpg - (143.43KB , 960x720 , 90004790_10157371198058867_5235764214148104192_n.jpg )
>> No. 21967 ID: d82311
File 159780683271.jpg - (154.78KB , 960x720 , 90531083_10157371200013867_1399122361592053760_n.jpg )
Wades watter better than an old Grand Cherokee too, right after this my jeep buddy winched out a grand that had hydro locked his 4.0L in these puddles.

No. 21982 ID: 70c872 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
  6x6 vs tree
I think you know the winner.

check out my channel for other good stuff.

File 140732561443.jpg - (619.33KB , 2048x1536 , US WW2 M2 w 37mm gun & 7 M1919 machine guns 19.jpg )
16967 No. 16967 ID: 2ae388 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [First 100 posts] [Last 50 posts]
The Medium Tank M2 was a United States Army tank that was first produced in 1939 by the Rock Island Arsenal, just prior to the commencement of the war in Europe. Production was 18 M2 tanks, and 94 slightly improved M2A1 tanks, for a total figure of 112. Events in Western Europe and on the Eastern Front rapidly demonstrated that the M2 was obsolete, and it was never used overseas in combat; it was used for training purposes throughout the war.

The M2's unique features included an unusually large number of machine guns, bullet deflector plates, and sloped armor on the hull front (glacis plate). The main armament was a 37 mm (1.5 in) gun, with 32 mm (1.3 in) armor; the M2A1 had a 51 mm (2.0 in) gun mantlet. The features of the M2 series development, both good and bad, provided many lessons for U.S. tank designers that were later applied with great success in the M3 Lee, M4 Sherman and many other armored fighting vehicles. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M2_Medium_Tank

Armed with 1× 37 mm Gun M3 and 7× (maximum 9) .30-06 Browning M1919 machine guns.

Previous tank thread:
230 posts and 212 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21619 ID: a921de
File 149105622387.jpg - (1.35MB , 2048x1357 , US Sheridan M-551 demolition tank, air transportab.jpg )
>> No. 21620 ID: a921de
File 149105660563.jpg - (383.82KB , 1951x1346 , US Ontos M50 tank destroyer, 1953, mounting 6 M40 .jpg )
>> No. 21621 ID: 45e3a1
File 149136315964.jpg - (45.44KB , 299x479 , cat_001.jpg )
it still isn't the coolest light tank...
>> No. 21622 ID: 45e3a1
File 149136323569.jpg - (101.41KB , 640x483 , aailighttankhighelevatihj3.jpg )
>> No. 21977 ID: 0d01d8
File 162904719319.jpg - (131.56KB , 1130x730 , t is for tonk.jpg )
nyoom, pew pew pew

No. 21978 ID: 589bf7 hide watch quickreply [Reply]

File 160683769949.jpg - (78.45KB , 802x500 , 4ohvwd.jpg )
21972 No. 21972 ID: 8dacf8 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
>> No. 21973 ID: f0df0e
File 16075802815.png - (601.58KB , 621x504 , wariosaddam.png )

File 157564640772.jpg - (1.11MB , 3264x2448 , 20191203_100236.jpg )
21949 No. 21949 ID: 2d114f hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Spotted this truck at work with a world war 1 centenary wrap.
2 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21952 ID: 2d114f
File 157564731637.jpg - (3.15MB , 2560x1920 , 20140704_155549.jpg )
A Pendolino with a poppy!
>> No. 21953 ID: 2d114f
File 157564821314.jpg - (3.11MB , 3712x2088 , P1050570.jpg )
Class 91 in WW1 centenary livery.
>> No. 21954 ID: 2d114f
File 157564859768.jpg - (2.49MB , 3712x2088 , P1050569.jpg )
"For the fallen" nameplate.
>> No. 21969 ID: 2e4e8b
File 160011102563.jpg - (3.97MB , 4032x3024 , IMG_20200914_185820.jpg )
Spotted today
>> No. 21970 ID: 7a5d59
that's mint.

File 153674602088.png - (938.63KB , 1000x563 , Helicarrier_Up-view.png )
21914 No. 21914 ID: 339526 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
Let's just gloss over the fact that it can fly and be invisible (apparently defying the laws of physics), let's discuss the helicarrier's flight deck design. Going by this picture, the flight deck is on two levels: Takeoff from the fo'c'sle, straight out of the hangar in a similar bi-level design to HMS Glorious. Landing is on an upper flight deck, which is angled. Given that the Quinjets are STOVL, the need for an angled deck is questionable, since there is no arrester gear and thus no risk missing it and having to "go around". There is also no ski-jump, but Quinjets may take off happily without one.
>> No. 21915 ID: 55fdd6
They also fly F35 B-variants in and out, as seen in the first Avengers. It's capable of STOVL but that design allows for less fuel-draining traditional take-off and landing and also allows adaptability for other non-STOVL aircraft to take off and land as well.
>> No. 21917 ID: 69150e
Not to shit on your morning brownies but Marvel Films©®™ are (im-)purely U.S. propaganda mouthpieces, for all the money and manpower from the U.S. Dept of Defense that gets invested in them at this time.


>> No. 21935 ID: 91237d
The benefit of aircraft carrier is that they use a more dense medium (water) to efficiently transport vehicles that use a less dense medium (air) which is less efficient to travel through, to carry out their mission.

Putting an aircraft carrier in air is pants on head retarded, absolutely nothing is gained by the arrangement.
>> No. 21946 ID: daa8a7
File 157276780796.jpg - (108.70KB , 800x540 , cloudbase_main_pic.jpg )
Also, I couldn't talk about the Helicarrier without bringing up the similarities with Cloudbase from Captain Scarlet.
Yep, it's another flying aircraft carrier. The only difference is this one can't go invisible.
>> No. 21968 ID: 132e8e

File 150637710674.jpg - (305.14KB , 1136x1200 , b-36_pit04.jpg )
21815 No. 21815 ID: df12a0 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
...got any image dumps of 'em, Bat Guano?
21 posts and 18 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21936 ID: 91237d
Anyone have internals of Su-34? I hear they have a toilet, beds, and a small kitchen.
>> No. 21938 ID: 132e8e
File 156860207244.gif - (413.88KB , 500x250 , downloadfile-3.gif )

Mmm no, sorry bru. I tried looking around, and the Wikipedia article seems to support the assertion that they have some sort of accommodation, but I got swamped by false returns when looking for cutaways, even after specifying strict *34*. Honestly, you might actually try old /k/ for something like this. Monkeys and typewriters, y'know.

Alternatively, you *could* get your paws on the source materials cited in that Wikipedia article and see where that gets you; both appeared to be printed volumes, so it shouldn't be too big a deal.

God help you if they're by Jane's, though.
>> No. 21948 ID: c50cab
The aircraft is the size of a F-111 so it's likely it's just a small alcove behind the crew seats with a toaster oven or microwave for heating ration packs and a chemical toilet/small bucket. There's probably enough floor space one of the pilots could get into a sleeping bag.
>> No. 21958 ID: b6db04
File 158817508174.jpg - (339.45KB , 900x600 , twerking under su34.jpg )
>> No. 21960 ID: 3efc75
File 159043746174.png - (234.29KB , 602x309 , main-qimg-8b30bec69bbe5c9785d5ee4ccbc07118.png )

How does the toilet on the SU-34 Russian fighter/bomber work?

Katya Aleksandra Hodgson, BTEC Applied Sciences, Hull College (2016)
Updated 36w ago · Upvoted by Andy Duffell, ex-fast jet armourer and Peter Wheeler, Pilot

Crudely put… it’s a large funnel leading into a cylinder filled with chemicals.

When people describe the Su-34 as having a toilet and a kitchen… it’s a bit of an exaggeration.

The enlarged cockpit area of the Su-34 does indeed provide a lot more comfort than typical fighter cockpits. The crew have space to comfortably sit and even move around a little, and don’t need the bulky flight suits typically worn by fighter pilots

However, it is important to remember that despite the enlarged cockpit, the aircraft is still based off fighter, albeit a large fighter. As such the space is still quite limited.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

File 157796441728.jpg - (170.64KB , 679x1397 , Hummer Japanized.jpg )
21956 No. 21956 ID: 283c52 hide watch quickreply [Reply]

Delete post []
Report post
Previous [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]