-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

Name
Email
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 300x300 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 678 unique user posts.

  • Blotter updated: 2017-02-04 Show/Hide Show All

PBE Shield Stickers and Deagle Boltface Patches On Sale Now!



File 14363110297.jpg - (141.99KB , 900x675 , kCn0hsg.jpg )
18950 No. 18950 ID: b998fa hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/business/article/russia-plans-new-interceptor-and-carrier-killer-nuclear-submarines/525045.html

>Russia will design two new classes of nuclear-powered submarines as part of President Vladimir Putin's 20 trillion ruble ($356 billion) rearmament campaign through 2020.

>Though the designs have not yet been named, one will be classified as an "underwater interceptor" and the other an "aircraft carrier killer," the head of the state-owned United Shipbuilding Corporation's state defense order department, Anatoly Shlemov, told news website Lenta.ru late last week.

>After years of decline in the wake of the Soviet Union's collapse, Russia's Defense Ministry has poured money into the construction of a new generation of nuclear-powered submarines. The first new types, the Borei- and Yasen-class, have already entered service.

Surely with the way the Russian economy is they ain't going to build a dedicated aircraft carrier killer submarine?

More like they are going to build some cruise / guided missile submarine like the Oscar-II?
28 posts and 16 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 19443 ID: cfe73e
File 144850448630.jpg - (1.91MB , 2440x1308 , Russian AS-18 Kazoo Kh-59MK2 anti-ship turbojet mi.jpg )
19443
>>19442
Playing the board (or living room carpet) wargame Harpoon, the old 1955 AS-1 Komet (NATO reporting name: Kennel) anti-ship missile was not very effective, but could at least be used as decoys when flying along with more dangerous bombers and missiles. Slow, short-ranged and inaccurate, but ships cannot ignore them. F-14 Tomcat interceptors groan to discover that they expended their Phoenix missiles downing Komets when more dangerous AS-18 Kazoo missiles were following.

- Kh-59M Ovod-MK2 (AS-18 'Kazoo') anti-shipping variant with a turbojet engine and larger warhead. Range 115 km.
>> No. 19444 ID: cfe73e
File 144850583832.jpg - (174.90KB , 2048x1356 , Russian AS-22 Kh-59MK2 AS-22 stealth standoff miss.jpg )
19444
>>19443
Oops!
The Kh-59M is the AS-18 Kazoo, but the Kh-59MK2 Stealth Standoff (also Kh59M2?) AS-22 stealth standoff version, rocket or turbofan engine, shown in MAKS 2015. Light compact tactical stealth ALCM with a range of 290km (for export) and 550km (for internal) versions. Rumors have told that India will get "special" export version with a range extended up to 350km.
>> No. 19445 ID: cfe73e
File 144850590185.jpg - (345.73KB , 1200x800 , Russian AS-22 Kh-59MK2 AS-22 stealth standoff miss.jpg )
19445
MAKS 2015: KTRV showcases Kh-59MK2 aircraft guided missile upgrades
Nikolai Novichkov, Moscow - IHS Jane's Defence Weekly
02 September 2015 http://www.janes.com/article/53970/maks-2015-ktrv-showcases-kh-59mk2-aircraft-guided-missile-upgrades
Among the most significant weapons to be exhibited at MAKS 2015 was an updated version of the Kh-59 stand-off land attack missile, called the Kh-59MK2.

Developed by the Raduga Design Bureau, part of Russia's Tactical Missiles Corporation (KTRV), the new variant - about to enter flight testing - has been configured to fit in the internal weapons bay of the Sukhoi PAK FA (T-50) fighter aircraft. Additionally, the body of the missile has been optimised for a reduced radar cross section (RCS).

The new, stealthy Kh-59MK2 is 4.2 m long, has a wingspan of 2.5 m, and a 0.4x0.4 m cross section with its wings and fins folded. Although currently designated as part of the Kh-59 family, it is expected to receive an entirely new designation in the future.

As for the original Kh-59, the missile is intended to strike a variety of fixed ground targets, including targets with low radar, infrared (IR), and optical background contrast, known position co-ordinates, and target area information features.

Powered by a Saturn 37-04 bypass turbojet (or a 50MT turbojet for export), the modernised Kh-59MK2 has an acknowledged range of 290 km. It incorporates an INS and a satellite guidance system (GPS and GLONASS) that can provide mid-course guidance, and an electro-optical (EO) terminal guidance system that gives a circular error probable of 3 m in either day or night operations. One or more missions can be loaded into that system to provide optional guidance on different targets.

The missile can fly as low as 50 m over the ground, with warhead options including a 310 kg penetrator or submunitions.
>> No. 21880 ID: c86ffa
This thread is interesting to me in light of the widely discussed speech last month given in Russia:

http://www.unz.com/article/the-implications-of-russias-new-weapons/
>> No. 21881 ID: bef190
https://www.globalresearch.ca/newly-revealed-russian-weapons-systems-political-implications/5631579


File 15153457249.jpg - (652.80KB , 565x850 , flashywhips.jpg )
21859 No. 21859 ID: 6a47c8 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Everyone tells me my scissor lift APC build dream is retarded
.. now I understand it looks stupid and is very slow but hear me out

you could armor it up and sit up there with a sniper rifle..
orrr
you could roll it up to areas unacessable to cars and provide ground support with a mobile gun carriage ( also can throw shot up homies in it as a medical vehicle)
... you could even pull up to 20ft windows and R6S it up and window entry right?

im not really worried about people trying to tip over my armored giraffe on account of how dang heavy these things are and sniper rifle
2 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21862 ID: 03f678
File 151542474024.jpg - (47.00KB , 460x354 , MS%2035-4-L%20Telescopic%20Boom%20Forklift.jpg )
21862
Get a boom lift.

>They're faster and more manuverable.
>The forks can be replaced with a basket or be used for breaching doors.
>higher ground clearences
>> No. 21866 ID: 6a47c8
>>21862
Oh yeah those do look cool. do you think i should go for an articulating version or just the telescoping one?
>> No. 21867 ID: 6a47c8
File 151690311889.png - (440.52KB , 681x410 , boomboomiwantuinmyroom.png )
21867
there is this one I saw on Alibaba.. looks pretty heavy duty and it says its only $5,000 that can't be real right? how cheap are these mini tanks usually
>> No. 21869 ID: 958644
File 15178797508.jpg - (575.98KB , 1760x1168 , 5264-3.jpg )
21869
There's also this option. Pic related.

Let's be real, unless your ground support in the debris free streets of NYC, a scissor lift can barely traverse any terrain and will still probably die after crawling 2 miles in 30-45 minutes.

A boom lift or even a fork lift could work pretty well, also scissor lifts are only rated to life something like 500 lbs, fork lifts are rated to lift many thousands of pounds, they can pick up cars. You could armor a fork lift and it will still move.

I think it's a novel idea, just maybe start with something that's actually made to drive around.
>> No. 21888 ID: c61fc8
Please make sure you get properly trained on it, using a lesson plan with a written test, administered by a real trainer, and annotated on a competency card.


File 151513136883.jpg - (95.35KB , 684x448 , ACH-47A.jpg )
21854 No. 21854 ID: df12a0 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
>The ACH-47A was originally known as the Armed/Armored CH-47A (or A/ACH-47A). It was officially designated ACH-47A[56] as a U.S. Army Attack Cargo Helicopter, and unofficially referred to as Guns A Go-Go. Four CH-47A helicopters were converted to gunships by Boeing Vertol in late 1965. Three were assigned to the 53rd Aviation Detachment in South Vietnam for testing, with the remaining one retained in the U.S. for weapons testing. By 1966, the 53rd was redesignated the 1st Aviation Detachment (Provisional) and attached to the 228th Assault Support Helicopter Battalion of the 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile). By 1968, only one gunship remained, and logistical concerns prevented more conversions. It was returned to the United States, and the program stopped.

>The ACH-47A carried five M60D 7.62 × 51 mm machine guns or M2HB .50-caliber machine guns, provided by the XM32 and XM33 armament subsystems, two M24A1 20 mm cannons, two XM159B/XM159C 19-Tube 2.75-inch (70 mm) rocket launchers or sometimes two M18/M18A1 7.62 × 51 mm gun pods, and a single M75 40 mm grenade launcher in the XM5/M5 armament subsystem (more commonly seen on the UH-1 series of helicopters). The surviving aircraft, Easy Money, has been restored and is on display at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama.
>> No. 21855 ID: df12a0
File 151513148020.jpg - (40.17KB , 640x335 , ACH-47AEasyMoney.jpg )
21855
>>21854
>> No. 21856 ID: df12a0
  >>21855
>> No. 21857 ID: df12a0
  >>21856


File 151214592467.jpg - (175.45KB , 1024x683 , 9539 resized.jpg )
21850 No. 21850 ID: 1eb131 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
I realise this story is from before June and it's now December, but I thought it would be quite relevant to OPchan:

http://www.shootinguk.co.uk/news/92741-92741


File 147901608580.jpg - (158.41KB , 1231x1668 , CxBDUGtWQAg5Yl3.jpg )
21419 No. 21419 ID: d4c8ee hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
The Russians seem to be having some trouble with their carrier again.
28 posts and 10 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21838 ID: 278cbe
File 151060959491.jpg - (97.05KB , 640x511 , QODkhio8.jpg )
21838
>>21837
No that's the other way around you fucko.
>building an aircraft carrier requires years of development and preliminary design assesment
>therefore you can't include it into current budget right away
>RRRRREEEEEEEEE RUSSIANS CANCELLED THEIR PROJECT BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE MONEYS, MERICA STRONK
>> No. 21839 ID: cce514
File 151061467913.gif - (2.66MB , 360x202 , CdlTl7F.gif )
21839
>>21838
Yes and program cut from the budget was for the development. No need to get that mad about it.
>> No. 21847 ID: 278cbe
>>21839
>for the development
Since when RnD of specific project requires specific article in military budget?
>> No. 21848 ID: 1d521e
>>21847

Uhh, except for blackbook projects, ALL of them. Governments don't just hand their militaries blank cheques, they're budgeted with tight cost controls. R&D is a massive cost, you can't just have a vague development budget for multiple projects or hide the costs in other parts of the budget. The money men would never allow it.
>> No. 21849 ID: 278cbe
File 151145105554.jpg - (172.79KB , 850x480 , 23560E_MVMS-2015_01.jpg )
21849
>>21848
>except for blackbook projects
>R&D is a massive cost, you can't just have a vague development budget for multiple projects or hide the costs in other parts of the budget. The money men would never allow it.
Yes you can, in fact, you must, if you want to have a space for several variants and have to change specifications during development and construction. Unless you have the bad habit to throw the money at problem until it goes away. I don't know, it might be that US project planning is entirely different and they need to invent moon landing from scratch every time they want to go to the Moon.

Let's see what you need for current specifications of aircraft carrier:
1. 100 000 tonne hull construction project (ice-capable for northern seas) - that is the main trouble, although not as much since Russia has several docks able of building such a ship. Latest series of ice breaking ships is already at 33 000 tonnes.
2. Power plant - nuclear reactors for this ship have been developed for new icebreakers already. Carrier's power plant will be designed for hybrid propulsion - which means that some modifications will be needed, naturally.
3. Air traffic management system - pretty much the reason Kuznetsov being updated. There's a lot of experience learned form operations in Syria and it will take time to learn from that.

The rest of the project will have to follow these primary goals, otherwise it will turn disastrous, of course. As I said, it will take years of preliminary development without any mentioning of final project. Compare that to the less exciting and more developed alternative which awaits decision with it's preliminary design already completed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lider-class_destroyer

>but Russkies didn't include them into their 2020-2025 budget
>"Putin’s 2025 modernization planning session was what didn’t make the cut"
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.


File 149864766571.jpg - (128.00KB , 639x479 , img.jpg )
21744 No. 21744 ID: 7c6b82 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Just put in papers today on this.

We will see what the bank has to say, hopefully not maniacal laughter followed by a slammed phone hangup...
3 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21749 ID: 839b87
File 149873603477.jpg - (325.47KB , 1280x960 , DSCF0047.jpg )
21749
>> No. 21750 ID: 839b87
File 149873718456.jpg - (2.96MB , 2560x1920 , 20150711_112547.jpg )
21750
>> No. 21752 ID: 2c840f
>>21747
/o/ may mays.
There's a pretty active truckerfag community on /o/. It's a fun thread to lurk.
>> No. 21805 ID: 08f745
File 150453729944.jpg - (772.54KB , 2560x1536 , da54b0d5fb_jpeg.jpg )
21805
So, Kenworth's were out of the ballpark due to wanting 10k+ more for the same fucking truck as the next guy.....

So I got this.
>> No. 21833 ID: f0fb5d
>>21805
Neat.

Is it true most payments on truck loans are weekly? Back in college I worked a job unloading a truck (at 6am on Sundays) and assembling furniture and the truckers were always fun to talk to.


File 148477566157.jpg - (76.66KB , 840x560 , D3_Army_Formation.jpg )
21523 No. 21523 ID: bb86e7 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Here is a good article summarizing the status of the Bell V-280 Valor Tiltrotor, one of (ann my personal favorite) the candidates for the Army’s Joint Future Vertical Lift program. http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-us-militarys-next-super-stealth-weapon-not-what-you-19090?page=2

No mid wing gearbox: http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/01/15/bell-touts-future-army-helicopter-design-v280-is-not-a-v22.html

As a 3rd generation tiltrotor, It is also supposed to have better Hot / High / Heavy characteristics than the V-22

One of the discussed versions is to be a slightly modified airframe for an attack version. Once the proof of concept is done and they have won the contract, I think they should instead use the front half of modified AH-1Z airframe, modified to carry a similar useful load to the Apache. The Cobra has a useful load of 5,764, Apache has around 9000 Pounds useful load, and the V-280 is currently touted to have a useful load of 1200.
3 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21623 ID: a1c7fe
>>21597
This looks like a superior solution in every way compared to Valor, but it doesn't have a good enough name so I guess we'll take the Marine Widowmaker 2.0
>> No. 21640 ID: 8566ef
Bell says the first flight of the V-280 is planned for September.
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=2481
>> No. 21804 ID: 3e9aae
File 15042960624.jpg - (440.52KB , 934x530 , V-280-prototype.jpg )
21804
>> No. 21807 ID: bb86e7
File 150479290526.jpg - (146.35KB , 1900x1040 , 280-226a.jpg )
21807
Official Prototype Rollout http://www.bellhelicopter.com/news/press-release/2017/9/v-280-achieves-completion

Includes pictures of test stand. They even have it hanging from it's engine nacelles.

Judging from these pictures, it is being rolled out from the southernmost hangar.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/35%C2%B012'19.3%22N+101%C2%B043'19.5%22W/@35.205371,-101.7239784,589m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x0:0x0!7e2!8m2!3d35.2053708!4d-101.7220941

And the test stand is at https://www.google.com/maps/place/35%C2%B012'30.1%22N+101%C2%B043'13.7%22W/@35.2083611,-101.7214542,299m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m9!1m2!2m1!1sbell+amarillo+assembly+center!3m5!1s0x0:0x0!7e2!8m2!3d35.208356
9!4d-101.7204838
>> No. 21817 ID: df12a0
>they should instead use the front half of modified AH-1Z airframe, modified to carry a similar useful load to the Apache

The Japanese manga series "Venus Wars" written and illustrated by Yoshikazu Yasuhiko, features a tilt-rotor attack VTOL of that very design concept.


File 148661464663.jpg - (74.29KB , 960x587 , 6b0b5309e4e26f5806960783008c571b.jpg )
21552 No. 21552 ID: 8a2fe4 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
There doesn't appear to be a general motorcycle thread on the board, so here's one.

I'm strongly considering getting a motorcycle. It's not for the cool factor, but because they seem like extremely affordable, practical commuting vehicles. The only thing that would keep me from getting one is my local climate. Anybody here ride in the desert? What's it like wearing All The Gear, All The Time in the Mojave in August? How long can one ride when it's 106 degrees out before it becomes intolerable?
27 posts and 17 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21696 ID: 587b99
File 149795713411.jpg - (3.91MB , 3096x2317 , motorcycle Kawasaki KLR250 military 1.jpg )
21696
>> No. 21697 ID: 587b99
File 149795722670.jpg - (2.25MB , 3348x2245 , motorcycle Kawasaki KLX250 Japan JGSDF reconnaissa.jpg )
21697
JGSDF reconnaissance motorcycle (Kawasaki KLX250), 1st Airborne Brigade. In Camp Shimoshizu, Japan, 29-Apr-2012.
>> No. 21698 ID: 587b99
File 14979572695.jpg - (2.98MB , 2486x1666 , motorcycle Kawasaki KLX250 Japan JGSDF reconnaissa.jpg )
21698
>> No. 21810 ID: bb86e7
File 150517415632.jpg - (159.28KB , 1200x800 , car_photo_344593.jpg )
21810
I like the idea of a motorcycle, but I am a bit paranoid about safety. Plus air conditioning. So my dream bike would be a Monotracer.
>> No. 21814 ID: 1f8e9e
>>21810
I actually saw one of these on the road in the DC area once. Surreal as hell to watch in motion, but the sponson-mounted wheels for low-speed balance are apparently turbo-awkward.

Right now I'm resurrecting a Honda Cub from 35 years being stored in a barn, but once that project is done I'll probably get some small adventure or dual sport bike like the Versys X 300, CRF250L, or the CB500X


File 150248159279.jpg - (177.65KB , 640x615 , cf4bd29b9f7a015a.jpg )
21795 No. 21795 ID: 6b2b62 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
This turns me on.
>> No. 21796 ID: a839aa
File 150254788945.jpg - (694.35KB , 1920x1080 , 6.jpg )
21796
Not sure why.

Then again I REALLY want to have a workshop were I can build one of these with modern materials.
>> No. 21803 ID: 13f512
File 150385854425.jpg - (313.43KB , 987x658 , 170810-F-BH566-0012.jpg )
21803
>> No. 21812 ID: 1668cd
File 150554002351.png - (327.79KB , 608x412 , fed06e8a625769d2d2ba4c30ed51cbc5.png )
21812
>>21795
I love it.

The following also makes my boner smack my jaw.

http://www.roadkill.com/keith-northrups-37-international-trophy-rat-is-every-kind-of-unexpected/

Guy turned a 1937 truck into a trophy truck.

Id love to do something like this some day.
>> No. 21813 ID: a85c26
>>21812

>chopping up an International

Ok, it looks like he did a good job though. That is neat.


File 147181109714.jpg - (886.15KB , 2100x1364 , US F-14 Tomcat w Tactical Airborne Reconnaissance .jpg )
21195 No. 21195 ID: 050b51 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
New fighter thread.
Old fighter thread: http://www.operatorchan.org/v/res/14172.html
- A U.S. Navy Grumman F-14B-150-GR Tomcat (BuNo 163221) attached to Fighter Squadron VF-102 aboard the aircraft carrier USS GEORGE WASHINGTON (CVN-73) soars through the skies over the Persian Gulf in support of Operation Southern Watch, 1997. The aircraft is fitted with a Tactical Aerial Reconnaissance Pod System (TARPS) including ECA and ALQ-167.
9 posts and 9 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21671 ID: 56190f
File 149510371268.jpg - (595.71KB , 1600x900 , UK WW2 Libellula tandem-winged experimental carrie.jpg )
21671
Libellula, a tandem-winged and twin-engined British experimental plane which gives the pilot an excellent view for landing on aircraft carriers (1945).
>> No. 21672 ID: d4c8ee
  >>21671
The British also tried this for carrier landings: just coat the deck with rubber land without gear.
>> No. 21673 ID: 56190f
File 149528586029.jpg - (1.37MB , 3000x1847 , US EA-18G Growler landing 1.jpg )
21673
>>21672
Problem with making planes without landing gear to belly-land on carrier decks covered with soft rubber is that the plane...
- Would have to be winched and taken to the elevator, catapult or placed on a wheeled cradle because it has no wheels to move around on deck.
- The plane cannot land with any stores under the wings like fuel tanks, rockets, missiles, bombs, gun pods or, as with this EA-18G Growler, delicate electronic jamming pods. Because they would be smashed upon landing.
>> No. 21674 ID: 56190f
File 149528617646.jpg - (1.14MB , 7000x4672 , US UAV X-47B 1st landing USS George H_W_ Bush (CVN.jpg )
21674
Even using stealth fighters that keep their stores in internal bomb bays, the rubber landing method would still be insane.

- The unmanned X-47B completes its first landing aboard USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), July 10, 2013, off the coast of Virginia. This event marks the first time the Navy landed an unmanned aircraft aboard an aircraft carrier.
>> No. 21811 ID: bb86e7
>>21672
Reminds me of the Gear up F-111 landing video I saw the other day. Looked just the same except without the bouncy.


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason  
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]