-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

Name
Email
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 300x300 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 716 unique user posts.

  • Blotter updated: 2017-02-04 Show/Hide Show All

File 147683619053.jpg - (373.25KB , 1251x749 , N0ojMQV.jpg )
21392 No. 21392 ID: bc78c2 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
I like this custom job
2 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21395 ID: 50f38c
File 147691418566.jpg - (2.16MB , 2729x1351 , Czech 155mm DANA Samobiezna armatohaubica wzor 197.jpg )
21395
They model that tourist transporter after the Czech DANA (ShKH vz.77) or improved Zuzana wheeled self-propelled 152mm or 155mm howitzer on 8x8 Tatra 813 chassis?
http://www.operatorchan.org/v/res/20048.html#20083
- Samobieżna armatohaubica wzór 1977 is the designation of SpGH DANA self-propelled howitzers in service with the Polish Land Forces.
>> No. 21396 ID: 50f38c
File 147691440165.jpg - (304.25KB , 1280x853 , Czech 152mm DANA self-propelled gun-howitzer vehic.jpg )
21396
Czech Republic army soldiers of 1st Platoon, Field Artillery in DANA 152mm self-propelled gun-howitzer vehicles maneuver to an objective during exercise Combined Resolve at the Joint Multinational Readiness Center in Hohenfels, Germany, Nov. 20, 2013. The intent of the exercise is to train and prepare U.S. led multinational brigades to interoperate with multiple partner nations against a complex threat.
>> No. 21397 ID: 50f38c
File 14769146144.jpg - (245.14KB , 1280x960 , Czech 152mm self-propelled gun-howitzer ShKH vz_ 7.jpg )
21397
Self-propelled gun-howitzer ShKH vz. 77 Dana, Králíky, Ústí nad Orlicí District, the Czech Republic.
>> No. 21398 ID: bc78c2
File 147705882433.jpg - (38.50KB , 640x336 , MUTTvidpic%20(Small).jpg )
21398
>>21395
Before concluding it was a custom built people wanted to say it looked like passenger vehicles they use inside mines.
>> No. 21399 ID: bc78c2
File 147705892225.jpg - (100.48KB , 620x350 , pro_mac10d_big.jpg )
21399


File 147181109714.jpg - (886.15KB , 2100x1364 , US F-14 Tomcat w Tactical Airborne Reconnaissance .jpg )
21195 No. 21195 ID: 050b51 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
New fighter thread.
Old fighter thread: http://www.operatorchan.org/v/res/14172.html
- A U.S. Navy Grumman F-14B-150-GR Tomcat (BuNo 163221) attached to Fighter Squadron VF-102 aboard the aircraft carrier USS GEORGE WASHINGTON (CVN-73) soars through the skies over the Persian Gulf in support of Operation Southern Watch, 1997. The aircraft is fitted with a Tactical Aerial Reconnaissance Pod System (TARPS) including ECA and ALQ-167.
4 posts and 4 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21200 ID: 050b51
File 147181241189.jpg - (3.49MB , 4268x2841 , US F-22 F-15 F-18 MiG-29 Su-27 & BAe Hawk Mk_2.jpg )
21200
>> No. 21237 ID: 8effed
File 14723337548.jpg - (398.78KB , 3384x2724 , US F-5E Northrop Tiger-II 2.jpg )
21237
>> No. 21388 ID: cce514
File 147624546879.jpg - (373.06KB , 3000x2100 , spanish-air-force-eurofighter-typhoon-from-ala-11-.jpg )
21388
If you think the F-35 is a boondoggle, I've got some Eurofighters to sell you.
>> No. 21389 ID: b86cd3
File 147639253076.jpg - (99.96KB , 1024x683 , 1024px-ILA_Berlin_2012_PD_193-2_JPG.jpg )
21389
>>21388
In the time it's taken for the Eurofighter to get a AESA radar, the F-35 was conceptualized, prototyped, competed against the X-32, won, finalized, boondoggled, sent to production, had most of the fires put out with piles of boondoggle money, and has been declared IOC.
>> No. 21390 ID: 9315da
File 14764099675.jpg - (1.10MB , 2736x1824 , IMG_1879modweb.jpg )
21390
>>21199
>>21200

appears to be Maylaysian air force. Didn't know they had both western and Russian/soviet aircraft.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Malaysian_Air_Force

have a photo I took at an airshow. F-100.


File 147544592266.jpg - (382.73KB , 1800x1197 , German WW2 50mm BK-5 aircraft cannon 2.jpg )
21320 No. 21320 ID: ec7ed1 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
Aircraft guns
Starting with the German BK-5 50mm cannon
The BK-5 was an adaptation of a tank gun and was intended primarily for use against Allied heavy bombers. Its magazine held 22 rounds, and the gun had a rate of 45 rounds per minute. BK-5 cannon were installed in some Me 410 twin-engine interceptors and experimentally in the Me 262 fighter, but the war ended before testing with the latter aircraft could be completed. Only about 300 of the guns were produced and combat usage was limited. When Reich Marshal Hermann Goering was captured and questioned on May 10, 1945, he mentioned the BK-5 experiments translated as follows:

"You might find around Germany some jet airplanes equipped with anti-tank guns. Don't blame me for such monstrosities. This was done on the explicit orders of the Fuehrer. Hitler knew nothing about the air. He may have known about the Army or Navy, but absolutely nothing about the air. He even considered the Me-262 to be a bomber and he insisted it should be called a bomber." http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/MuseumExhibits/FactSheets/Display/tabid/509/Article/196225/german-bk-5-50mm-cannon.aspx
- DAYTON, Ohio -- German BK-5 50mm cannon on display in the World War II Gallery at the National Museum of the United States Air Force. (U.S. Air Force photo)
43 posts and 43 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21383 ID: bf6179
File 147613792686.jpg - (296.35KB , 800x1221 , UK WW2 Westland Whirlwind 1940-43 heavy fighter 3.jpg )
21383
Crew: One pilot
Length: 32 ft 3 in (9.83 m)
Wingspan: 45 ft 0 in (13.72 m)
Height: 11 ft 0 in (3.35 m)
Wing area: 250 ft² (23.2 m²)
Airfoil: NACA 23017-08
Empty weight: 8,310 lb (3,777 kg)
Loaded weight: 10,356 lb (4,707 kg)
Max. takeoff weight: 11,445 lb (5,202 kg)
Powerplant: 2 × Rolls-Royce Peregrine I liquid-cooled V12 engine, 885 hp (660 kW) at 10,000 ft (3,050 m) with 100 octane fuel each
Propellers: de Havilland constant speed propeller
Propeller diameter: 10 ft (3.28 m)

Performance
Maximum speed: 360 mph (313 knots, 580 km/h) at 15,000 ft (4,570 m)
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 21384 ID: bf6179
File 147613925642.jpg - (99.39KB , 1000x723 , UK WW2 Westland Whirlwind 4x Hispano 20mm cannon 1.jpg )
21384
>> No. 21385 ID: bf6179
File 147613928818.jpg - (418.13KB , 1024x776 , UK WW2 Westland Whirlwind 4x Hispano 20mm cannon 3.jpg )
21385
>> No. 21386 ID: bf6179
File 147613929731.jpg - (106.97KB , 1000x720 , UK WW2 Westland Whirlwind 4x Hispano 20mm cannon 2.jpg )
21386
>> No. 21387 ID: bf6179
File 14761393139.jpg - (253.85KB , 1280x734 , UK WW2 Westland Whirlwind FB Mk_I 1942 1.jpg )
21387


File 146955149770.jpg - (308.66KB , 894x1600 , ss Udvar 000.jpg )
21058 No. 21058 ID: 9dcda2 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [First 100 posts] [Last 50 posts]
https://airandspace.si.edu/

> The Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center, also called the Udvar-Hazy Center, is the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum's annex at Washington Dulles International Airport in the Chantilly area of Fairfax County, Virginia, United States

I checked out the Udvar-Hazy Center. Pretty damn cool. I got a little emotional around the Space Shuttle Discovery. I wasn't trying to document the whole museum, I just snapped some pictures of cool stuff. (With a specific interest in engines.)
114 posts and 101 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21329 ID: ec7ed1
File 147545540436.jpg - (235.05KB , 1800x1184 , UK WW2 De Havilland DH98 Mosquito B_ Mk_ 35 manufa.jpg )
21329
Mosquito Markings
Just before D-Day (the June 6, 1944, invasion of France), black and white stripes were applied almost overnight to a vast majority of U.S. and British aircraft to clearly identify them during the Normandy landings. In the rush to mark all the aircraft, masking and spraying sometimes gave way to more expeditious method of painting them by hand.

Invasion stripes, like the ones being applied by the ground crewman in the museum's exhibit, would have completely encircled the wings and fuselage. The 25th Bombardment Group adopted a red tail for their Mosquitoes in August 1944 and removed the invasion stripes from the upper wing and upper fuselage surfaces in September 1944.
>> No. 21330 ID: ec7ed1
File 147545543387.jpg - (253.56KB , 1600x1004 , UK WW2 De Havilland DH98 Mosquito B Mk_ 35.jpg )
21330
TECHNICAL NOTES:
Armament: 4,000 lbs. of bombs in bomber version
Engines: Two Rolls-Royce Merlins of 1,690 hp each
Maximum speed: 415 mph
Cruising speed: 276 mph
Range: 1,955 miles
Ceiling: 42,000 ft.
Span: 54 ft. 2 in.
Length: 40 ft. 6 in.
Height: 12 ft. 6 in.
Weight: 23,000 lbs. loaded
>> No. 21331 ID: ec7ed1
File 147545549788.jpg - (3.47MB , 2400x1800 , UK WW2 De Havilland DH98 Mosquito B_ Mk_ 35 cockpi.jpg )
21331
De Havilland DH 98 cockpit in the WWII Gallery at the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force.
>> No. 21332 ID: ec7ed1
File 147545562341.jpg - (3.92MB , 2400x1800 , UK WW2 De Havilland DH98 Mosquito B_ Mk_ 35 cockpi.jpg )
21332
The Timber Terror is one of my favorite strike bombers of WW2.
>> No. 21380 ID: 9315da
File 147600534843.jpg - (2.60MB , 2736x1824 , IMG_2302modweb.jpg )
21380
>>21324

Like I said, if you get the chance, do. The place is so huge that even if you have a slight interest in space and aviation you can easily spend the entire day there.

I'm planning on visiting there again, thinking of bringing my camera tripod (they'll let you bring it in, last I checked) so I can take some decent photos with their crap lighting.


No. 21304 ID: bc78c2 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
  what the fucko
>> No. 21377 ID: a6c0d3
neat! i could have sworn that i saw one of these things in my childhood parked on the side of the road in the northeastern pennsylvania area like 25 years ago


No. 21374 ID: bc78c2 hide watch quickreply [Reply]
  still fucking cool
>> No. 21375 ID: bc78c2
  neat


File 147222795370.jpg - (84.26KB , 799x555 , camping.jpg )
21230 No. 21230 ID: 88977e hide watch quickreply [Reply]
hello there OPERATORchan

i am looking for the most practical and economic way about going about financing and purchasing a camping vehicle...

i don't need one that is very big, or expensive, or fancy... just something that is practical and economic friendly (i.e... value for money)

...perhaps one with a shower, and good AC

thank you! <3

:)
>> No. 21231 ID: 8effed
File 147223281729.jpg - (412.69KB , 1024x768 , car, Cadillac ambulance 1974 1.jpg )
21231
Back around 1988 or so, I bought a 1974 Cadillac ambulance for $500. I got it for an RV to go on hunting and camping trips. And it worked out! I removed the paramedic's chair, put a bed in and it was all set. That gigantic car had a 472 CID V-8 engine and a 27 gallon fuel tank. The 1975 Cadillac had a 600 lb 500 cubic inch (8.2 liter) engine.
The 1974 model year was impacted by the oil embargo of late 1973 and early 1974, which hit large cars especially hard, as fears of rationing drove people to buy smaller cars with better fuel economy.
>> No. 21232 ID: 8effed
File 147223380545.jpg - (369.70KB , 1024x706 , car, Cadillac ambulance 1974 2.jpg )
21232
That ambulance probably weighed around 6000 pounds and probably got around 7 miles per gallon. Not a very economical car to take to the wilderness, but you could stand up in it.

I know that the EPA had only a single (not separate city/highway) MPG rating list in 1974 and I think that was the first year for it. In Thos. E. Bonsalls "Cadillac The American Standard" there is a reprint of an advertisement Cadillac sent to dealers in 1974 to run in local media, this one from Valley Cadillac. It states that the Environmental Protection Agency made a study recently of gas mileage delivered by 376 new automobiles and that the Cadillac Eldorado was found to deliver 10.4 MPG, the de Ville 8.9 MPG (I dont understand why thered be a difference), and also listed some other cars including Lincoln 7.9, Chrysler 8.4 and smaller cars like the Pontiac Le Mans at 8.4 and Oldsmobile Cutlass at 7.3. 1973 and 1974 were probably the two worst years for fuel mileage on GM cars with very restrictive emission controls which gave both poor economy and poor drivability. In 1975, all GM cars got catalytic converters which allowed the engines to perform better and give better economy. By 1976, the EPA was listing both city and highway mileage and I still have the EPA window sticker from my 76 350 4BBL (Olds engine)Cutlass which shows 15 city and 21 highway. http://forums.cadillaclasalleclub.org/index.php?topic=85736.0
>> No. 21273 ID: 5c1d8c
File 147351693336.jpg - (60.00KB , 433x300 , img_1778.jpg )
21273
>> No. 21287 ID: 044fd0
My GF and I went on a couple road trips last year in her Prius. Didn't have a shower but with the back seat folded down it had more than enough room for her and I to sleep. Prius sucks balls in town for lack of acceleration but it's quite adequite on the interstate. Got about 65 MPG in the Florida Keys and about 55 out in Arizona and Nevada.
I also have a 94 Chevy Astro LT AWD that was formerly registered as an RV. It could fit a large futon in the back. Didn't get the best fuel economy and the 28 gallon tank was a real pain in the wallet to fill but it could cruise along at 100mph all day and no cop ever gave it a second glance. Took it to Florida a couple of times back when the AC worked. Climbed the embankment closing off the lost highway at Centralia at drove around there one time. Once drove it around for more than a month with a broken torsion bar.
>> No. 21313 ID: 9dc901
  >>21231
>>21232


File 147162551411.jpg - (117.77KB , 1280x795 , Tu-160_(12956971034)_1.jpg )
21175 No. 21175 ID: b430d1 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Last 50 posts]
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Security-Industry/2016/08/16/Modernized-Russian-bombers-will-be-able-to-fly-in-the-stratosphere/9541471356233/
>At the end of 2016, the Russian Defense Ministry will receive the first delivery of the renewed NK-32 engines for the Tu-160M2 strategic missile-carrying bombers.

>According to the developers, the new engine will help the plane fly up to the stratosphere at an altitude of 60,000 feet.

>"The new NK-32 version can work not only as a reactive plane engine but also as a rocket engine. Thanks to this, the Tu-160M2 will be able to cruise at a height where no enemy anti-aircraft system can strike it," a source in the Russian defense industry said.

>The modernized plane's first flight will take place in 2018.

>According to Russian air force chief Viktor Bondarev, the Defense Ministry plans to buy about 50 Tu-160M2 planes.
55 posts and 40 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21295 ID: 8f9c57
File 147415368472.jpg - (608.78KB , 1500x998 , US A-10 Thunderbolt II Warthog boneyard 3.jpg )
21295
But the A-6 has been retired. Along with the F-117. And the Air Force has been in an ongoing controversy in retiring the A-10. The Air Force’s latest retirement schedule, unveiled in its latest budget request for FY17, begins divesting the A-10s in FY18. The last A-10 would be sent to the boneyard in FY22. http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/air-space/2016/04/25/house-legislation-restricts--10-retirement/83508968/
>> No. 21296 ID: ad2b13
  >>21294
Aside of heavy payload that's kind of why it makes for a great example. This was before stealth, so you can think of it as a pre-stealth stealth bomber.

The most modern example of a bomber using speed, storms and terrain for "stealth" would be F-15E, or that new Sukhoi bomber.
>> No. 21298 ID: 63313b
File 14743524825.jpg - (335.03KB , 1024x909 , LAP-render-top.jpg )
21298
>>21296
>>21257
If we're on the old stealth vs. terrain cover debate...why not both? Apparently a low-altitude penetrator version of the B-2 was under consideration at one point in its development.

>>21175
>rocket engine
Is that a translation error? I would expect a hybrid turbo-ramjet like the SR-71 had.
>> No. 21299 ID: b86cd3
Imagine modern air combat as playing flashlight tag in a field at night. You can turn on your flashlight (radar) to try and find other players, but they in turn see your light (EM emissions). Low-observability technology is represented by some players wearing ninja suits while others wear reflective vests.
>> No. 21300 ID: 9723b1
>>21298
Erm I think the point is to cut costs so more platforms can be produced with a lower tech base. Any total war scenario is going to involve nukes, and nukes will crash your tech base pretty fast.

Although I don't think the A-6 guy is talking about that, he's just being pedantic about the comparison.

>>21299
Modern stealth is only effective in a narrow band, called the X band. It's not effective in other bands of radar, such as those used by ground, shipborne or AWACS search, tracking and interrogation radars. Or in infrared, which is becoming distressingly common and depressingly sophisticated. Or passive radar... once that comes in it's pretty much over for stealth forever.


No. 8774 ID: a8a5cc hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Last 50 posts]
  >The US Navy has completed the first ever catapult launch of the Northrop Grumman X-47B unmanned combat air system demonstrator (UCAS-D) aircraft at NAS Patuxent River, Maryland, earlier today. Apparently it went very well, the Navy sent over this video of the launch earlier this evening.

>The catapult shot is a crucial step towards the jet's initial sea-trials, which are expected next year (the X-47B that's on Truman right now is merely doing deck-handling exercises). The sea-trials will involve catapult launches, arrested recoveries and having the X-47B fly the pattern around the "boat" while coordinating with carrier's air traffic controllers. The idea behind the UCAS-D is to prove that an autonomous unmanned aircraft can safely operate at sea onboard a carrier.

>If the X-47B fails, the prospects for the follow-on Unmanned Carrier Launched Surveillance and Strike (UCLASS) aircraft program would dim markedly. The Navy is counting on the X-47B to pave the way for that program.

http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2012/11/us-navy-completes-first-shore-.html

Pretty fucking cool.
86 posts and 61 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 21055 ID: 1e7925
>>21051
>>21053

Lots of talk about this at work. The AI mostly improved on the existing AI opponent, it's not really OMG TERMINATOR AI thing.


The U Cincinnati article is a little less hype-y. The linked white paper comes across as an infomercial for the guys' fuzzy logic algorithm.


http://magazine.uc.edu/editors_picks/recent_features/alpha.html

http://www.omicsgroup.org/journals/genetic-fuzzy-based-artificial-intelligence-for-unmanned-combat-aerialvehicle-control-in-simulated-air-combat-missions-2167-0374-1000144.pdf
>> No. 21056 ID: 396316
>>21051
Yeah no shit it doesn't require a lot of processing power to calculate vectors in a completely controlled environment, I've been getting my ass kicked by AI since ace combat two.

It's when it gets into uncontrolled environments that things get a lot more complicated.

Instead of having every grid point mapped in a computer and every moving object accounted for, in a real world the AI would have to collect data and build a HIGHLY IMPERFECT picture of the world around it. For example there would be no way to predict and react to simple things like enemy flak blowing up near or a sensor going out.

Also a lot more important is the ability to decide where the pilot fits in the overall tactical, strategic and even political landscape. If he shoots down that Israeli jet will the pilot be starting a thermonuclear war? Is that passenger jet out of Iran a simple airliner or a converted chemical weapons delivery system, and how to make a value judgement?
>> No. 21141 ID: 30f399
File 146960469072.jpg - (750.24KB , 1500x828 , US UAV X-47B Northrop-Grumman J-UCAS RC bomber 5.jpg )
21141
>>21056
The AI would build an imperfect picture of the world around it, like how human pilots do, but people can make sound judgments based on common sense and experience (difficult to quantify and translate into a computer program), but an AI could just ignore things that are not threats or concerning to the mission. Such as being mindful of areas it is not supposed to enter, the ground or navigational hazards, or threats such as enemy radar, anti-aircraft artillery or missiles. When fighting an aerial dogfight, the AI could be programmed to concentrate on the most pressing concerns in order of importance, such as enemy aircraft, flak and SAMs.
And as for predicting the trajectory of enemy flak, that would be the AI's forte as long as its sensors are effective (and the sensors it is sharing with its network). If the AI indeed thinks and reacts with logical decisions hundreds of times faster than a human can, it could weave through flak and obstructions like an ace in the prosecution of its mission.
And determining who to attack, the AI would be governed by the rules of engagement, just like human pilots are, but the AI might make unfortunate judgment calls.
>> No. 21142 ID: 30f399
File 146960622757.jpg - (163.20KB , 1600x1143 , US bomb AIM-9X Sidewinder missile by Raytheon 1.jpg )
21142
Now imagine if such sophistication could be imparted to missiles. If the missile's sensors are precise enough to correctly identify the enemy aircraft it was locked on to, the missile's AI might be effective in ignoring counter-measures and predicting the aircraft's movements to plot the best course to destroy the aircraft.
- US Raytheon AIM-9X Sidewinder missile.
>> No. 21143 ID: 30f399
File 146960631447.jpg - (90.17KB , 1152x722 , US bomb AIM-9X Sidewinder missile seeker head 2.jpg )
21143
"You're not fooling anyone, flyboy."


File 146023209316.jpg - (173.88KB , 800x600 , My BJ40.jpg )
20439 No. 20439 ID: cad48c hide watch expand quickreply [Reply]
So after much thought, I've decided to sell off the BJ40 I was working on. While I enjoy the hell out of the cantankerous bastard, it's not really a viable option for my daily driver needs for a couple reasons -- most notably, finding parts is a pain in the ass and only going to get worse.

So now I'm in the market for something new and looking for ideas. I'm looking for a 4WD SUV (or much less preferably pickup), probably mid/full-sized. While I like the capacity of a pickup, it rains enough here and I find utility in having capacity for 3-4 people that the enclosed space of a SUV is likely a better tradeoff. Having said that, I do want to be able to chuck a range day's worth of gear in the back without much trouble. Most of my driving will be on paved roads/highways, but I want to be able to get offroad easily enough, though obviously I'm willing to give up crazy extreme rock-crawling ability in the name of practical road driving.

So far this has lead me to look at 4Runners, newer Land Cruisers, and XTerras. I've got about 10K to throw at this, can wiggle a bit. Here's my real problem though -- I'd prefer a diesel, but the American market seems to hate them outside of absurdly large pickups.

Anyone have any other ideas?
29 posts and 6 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 20723 ID: 2a7fd5
File 14665070696.jpg - (56.77KB , 506x286 , WHYWHYWHY.jpg )
20723
Urgh.

>Swapping Japanese or American lel simplicity for overengineered euroshit
Pic related.

>Wanting to pay the euroshit tax on top of the diesel parts tax
Pic related.

If you absolutely WANT to pay a premium on parts and have a bad time working on your own vehicle, why not go for a Mercedes OM617 or OM601? Hell, in >>20685 it looks like there might even be room for an OM617 (the straight-5) in there.

The ALH in that Xterra is somewhat better than earlier engines. For one, they run the oil pump on a chain from the crankshaft, and the vacuum pump off the end of the camshaft, as opposed to running an extra jackshaft like on the 1.6IDI and the first gen TDI. But, it does run the water pump off the (already stressed) timing belt. Since it's a diesel, it's an interference engine.
The Mercedes engines are chain timed, and they run the water pump from an accessory drive belt.


So, you've got your swap. That costs $7000+. And you get 30+MPG. Great. A 1.6L automatic Sidekick gets about 30 MPG, and they can be found for $2000-4000.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 21029 ID: f2112f
File 146656461964.jpg - (14.46KB , 480x270 , 12189770_10153817033884758_365100022701893514_n.jpg )
21029
>>20723

He used to be married to OM617's but moved to TDI's. He explained why once but I don't remember enough details not to butcher the reasoning. It doesn't cost him $7000 to do the swap, that's what he sells them for.

Pic is a TDI Jetta towing a Pathfinder. That turned some heads.
>> No. 21041 ID: cad48c
>>20723
Probably just going to stick to my 4Runner plan, put another 200K on whatever I find, and when it finally wears the fuck out maybe I'll have enough banked to get something interesting. Maybe we'll see some interesting diesels in the market by then that aren't a total pain in the dick.
>> No. 21043 ID: f87148
File 146670344793.jpg - (53.17KB , 344x257 , land_rover_tdi.jpg )
21043
This thread inspired me to finally do a bit of searching regarding something that's been lurking in the far back recesses of my mind for years now, and ohhh shit, there's someone who actually does this commercially!

http://www.landroverimport.com/index.html
>> No. 21054 ID: d23ffe
>>20439
I've been looking around for the same. I like my expedition, but I'd prefer a diesel.

Jeep made a Liberty with a diesel for a while, rare but you can find them.

>>20459
>>20460
No Amarok yet, but the Touareg and mid size VW have been available for a while, both in diesel with 4wd.

>>20474
The EPA is horribly out of control. When the nation was being crippled by near $4/gal gas. The EPA was fining the crap out fuel companies for failure to meet impossible standards, which was adding something like another 20 cents per gallon, that's border line economic treason.

>>20479
While economy doesn't directly equal lower emissions. It can greatly reduce the footprint. Every unit of gas from the crude coming out of the ground to evaporation at the pump increases polution. Not to mention meeting the standards often leads to poor mpg, which is self defeating.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason  
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]