>>59363
Welp, no ultra-wide support. It runs at 3440x1440 but with black bars on the side. Some people seem to be having joystick problems too, and as such is getting review bombed on Steam. What a bunch of bitches.

I went straight to the xbox controller rather than try to dick with my Thrustmaster T1600 and mouse (Hand on Mouse and Stick). Hopefully they patch in ultrawide and more control configuration options.

Otherwise, it looks and runs good. V-sync can be disabled and works great with my 100hz G-sync monitor.

Fuck yeah starfighter.

Carrier landing.

Fffwwwooossshhhh.

>>59370

http://steamcommunity.com/games/773951/announcements/detail/1651005272368309443

G3 MOTHERFUCKERS

Looks cool.

>>59267
that model looks disgusting, the textures are so bland and there's no material definition whatsoever

>>59301

Send your resume to the dev's then almighty god.

Sounds like this game went to shit this year.

>Over the past day or so, numerous reports have started emerging from Reddit that Anthem is causing their PS4s to crash. Reddit user u/forthemasters kicked off the conversation this weekend on the official Anthem subreddit stating that the game is the only one they have that constantly causes their PS4 to crash. “When encountering a crash or game error, sometimes I get booted to the main menu or out of the game completely to the PS4 dashboard. But twice now when trying to matchmake my PS4 has completely turned off,” the user posted.

>The story was met with dozens of similar tellings from others in the thread who have been playing Anthem on PS4. “The worst part is when it shuts your console off, it does it as if you pulled the power plug out of the wall. The console has to fix itself as well as repair my external HDD,” responded one Reddit user in the thread. In a separate thread, one Redditor said that Anthem completely bricked their own PS4. “My playstation has been completely bricked to the point of not even turning on because of Anthem,” they said in the post.

https://www.dualshockers.com/anthem-bricking-ps4-refunds/

  >>59383
Console plebs.

>>57039
I managed to get good with the starship, but most people will justifiably find it to be total shit.

Tumor is still in effect and will fuck you.

Camouflage system came out in the latest update.

Wasn't the tank shit in real life? If so Armored Warfare should be praised for their approach to realism...

>>57232
It is worse than it should be.

The tank actually isn't that bad. It'll dish out a decent amount of damage, and protect against shot placement well enough, but the reload times and speed of the tank itself are awful.

Positioning is all, don't be the one who rushes forward with no scouts in the open.

Amazon fucked up today and listed the deluxe edition of the game for $10 and I was able to get it before they fixed it. Any tips for somebody who's never played Battletech/Mechwarrior stuff before?

>>59315
Concentrate fire.
Flamers are really OP.
Getting special abilities like Bulwark for your mechwarriors are practically mandatory.
LRMs cause a disproportionate number of head hits, unless you edit the game's .json files.
Don't underestimate vehicles. Some like the Shreck, Demolisher, SRM Carrier, and LRM Carrier can really fuck you up.
Expect to be outnumbered on many missions, unfairly so (supposedly changed on the newest patch though).

>vehicles will fuck you up
>Shreck
Well, yeah, it carries three PPCs.

>Demolisher
Well, yeah, it carries two AC/20s.

>SRM Carrier
Well, yeah, it carries ten SRM-6s.

>LRM Carrier
Well, yeah, it carries three LRM-20s.

...and in tabletop, vehicles gain NO heat penalties.

>>59351
>...and in tabletop, vehicles gain NO heat penalties.
yet they get extra fucked up by heat-causing weapons, like infernos and plasma rifles.

>>59352
It's Battletech; EVERYTHING gets fucked by heat-causing weapons.

Tank resupply station.

It looks pretty cool. (Upped the contrast and saturation for this pic.)

Otherwise the game kind of has the same problem as Farcry 5 where the contrast is too high. Everything is either blindingly bright or dark as fuck.

Another screenshot, retouched.

What are your system specs, Avgas?

>>59353
Desktop:
Intel i5-6600K Processor (3.5 to 3.9 ghz)
Nvidia 1070
16 megachips of RAM
Samsung 950 M2 interface SSD
Asus PG348q Gsync 100hz 3440x1440 34" monitor (IPS panel)
https://www.asus.com/us/ROG-Republic-Of-Gamers/ROG-SWIFT-PG348Q/

Laptop:
https://www.msi.com/Laptop/GT72VR-7RD-Dominator.html
Intel i7 7700HQ
Nvidia 1060
16 rams
Samsung 850 evo SATA interface SSD

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>59295
No we won't.

:^)

>>59293
I'll bet against that with "100 Stalkers drop into the Zone and battle for supremacy over a limited supply of Sidorovich's Loot Crates in STALKER 2: Royale."

>>59294
Yeah all the people involved with creating the series ended up at 4A or other companies, and I haven't heard great things about Cossacks 3.

>>59298
ahaha

https://store.steampowered.com/app/819500/Fear_The_Wolves/

>>59341
I decided to give it a try. Pretty fun when the match actually starts, takes forever for at least 40 (minimum amount) to join.

>>59341
>>59343
I have a few hours into it. It's basically PUBG meets STALKER(-ish). The player base is low and probably won't grow much due to negative reviews and the $20 initial price tag. If it cost less, or had more people playing I'd recommend it. But unless it grows or the price comes down, stick with PUBG. there aren't too many bugs, I've only had it crash on the menu a few times but no in game crashes at all. I absolutely love STALKER so I'll keep playing this for a few weeks and see where it goes.